Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)TR
Posts
0
Comments
481
Joined
2 yr. ago

  • And much like everything else the chinese government pushes, it's all lies. Big fucking surprise.

    Only complete morons and paid shills believe anything coming out of the CCP or related news media these days. Hell, the most recent investigation into their economy by the university of chicago discovered that their economy is at least 60% smaller than they've reported, not to mention the widespread civil engineering and economic failures in their various social security and health care systems.

    Reference: https://bfi.uchicago.edu/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/BFI_WP_2021-78.pdf

  • Did a complete idiot write this article? How the fuck are you allowed to report on business without the basic understanding of technological innovation and its impact on business relationships and transitioning business operations?

    Does this dumb motherfucker think that we still have horse and buggy businesses and children working looms?

  • There's not a single statistic that comes out of the chinese government that's accurate by any measure.

    For reference on their economic numbers versus reality: https://www.moneymacro.rocks/2022-10-27-china-smaller/ Macro economics professor's report on the matter and the CCP accidentally admitting the fact they doctor all their statistics: https://www.reuters.com/article/us-china-economy-wikileaks-idUSTRE6B527D20101206/ as well as an in depth research report on their reported GDP versus country-wide activity https://bfi.uchicago.edu/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/BFI_WP_2021-78.pdf

    China's GDP is at LEAST 60% smaller than they've reported. They're still the second largest economy but by no means are they ANYWHERE near the USA in economic growth, stability or reliability.

  • Sure, if the only thing they were talking about was just the build quality. However they didn't decide to stop there, nor in my opinion, did they keep it professional at all. The article reads more like the opinion piece of someone who's got a personal vendetta against tesla or the ceo rather than someone judging a vehicle on its quality of construction.

  • Tiktok has a lot of serious problems associated with it but I doubt the CCP's involvement is anywhere near as high as political morons who barely know how to use their phones are proposing.

    Especially given the statistics presented do not, in fact, paint a line as much as a number of random dots with a focus on the ones the 'researchers' don't like. This is easily a type 1 error that these people are engaging in and absolutely failing at restricting. The point of research is to remove personal bias in an attempt to determine the truth of the matter, not disregard evidence to pursue your personal vendettas on the public stage using erroneous data

  • I haven't had money for holiday presents in over a decade, I don't plan to waste money on it now. Majority of "presents" end up in the landfill or as returns, to be sent to the landfill anyway, so mindless consumerism wins again.

    If I give someone something it'll be cash toward whatever they intended to buy anyway.

  • Not that that will stop them from doing something completely retarded. It hasn't before and the pieces of human garbage in power will continue to push any regurgitated trash thrown their way by corporate entities so long as it comes with a fat bribe.

    Keep in mind these are the same people selling weapons from Canada to every single dictator and authoritarian in the world, with our weapons somehow still landing in enemy hands more than a decade after the initial inquiry into how US soldiers were being killed by Canadian weapons in Iraq and Afghanistan (See russia/afghanistan list of weapons by both sides)

  • I understand you have literacy issues so I'll correct you and move on since I don't like spending overmuch time in dialogue with idiots.

    As I mentioned I have experienced actual starvation, thanks mainly to the loving care the Canadian government puts in group homes.

    Now, I don't complain because I'm not a bitch.

    Once again, wrong on all counts and judging from your comment history you have very little likelihood of ever actually being right, but I digress, learn how to read, moron.

  • Ah, so you actually don't know how to read.

    Have a good day, try reading a few novels and maybe do an english class or two seeing as you can't understand something as basic as a fact.

    For reference, facts don't take sides, they just are. Unlike your "ability" to interpret information freely provided.

  • I barely accept religious food preferences and now you want me to accept political food preferences? I eat anything and don't complain because I'm not a bitch and I've experienced literal starvation before.

    What the fuck is this ridiculous amount of entitlement.

    The ONLY appropriate reason for food variety in MRE's is allergies and so the troops don't go insane from the constant repetitiveness of one type of trash food over and over.

  • People that write articles about subjects should at least have a bare minimum education in said subject matter. The fact less than a percent of the images in a multi billion set were problematic is actually impressive.

    Anyone who has ever moderated any kind of risque forum or board would have an understanding of just how ridiculously common this shit is and ON THE CLEAR NET of all things.

    If top level domains can't deal with this shit how is a NON PROFIT supposed to? Especially when a majority of the images come from the companies that make money off their gather and sale (getty/google/et al).

    This is such a garbage article written by a garbage person with little to no education in any of the matters they're discussing.

  • I didn't say it did? Do you have problems with literacy?

    Also this is a forum for discussion, not a court and clearly you're not a lawyer and I'm not saying whether I am or not as I made no appeal to authority, I stated a fact. You can't just ignore facts because you don't like reality.