Beemo Dinosaurierfuß @ toastus @feddit.de

Posts

0

Comments

248

Joined

2 yr. ago

Dies your PiHole block Youtube ads?

An oldie but a goodie.

That's pretty dope.

I just think many humans don't grasp the concept that we can also piss something else off and should gtfo out of their area.

Especially since we make more and more parts of this planet our areas.

Jail.

What a knob.

And meanwhile France on average buys electricity from Germany because the German shit works (including the renewables) and the French nuclear plants are more often off than on.

Talk about reliable energy...
And there is always sun or wind somewhere.

Damn, imagine having the urge to go to the internet just to announce that you are too racist to watch some cartoon.

Thanks.

When I finally get my deck I will give it a try.
Trading is for wfh days then.

Similar for one of mine.

The other one also wants belly scritches, but he also also wants to scratch the shit out of you if you do it.
If you then decide to not touch his belly again to not get scratched he looks at you all disappointed.

Do you enjoy PoE with a controller?

I didn't like it when I triedit once, but I might give it another chance.

I have bought GD specifically because someone said it was better on controller than PoE and I kinda wanted to play on the couch when I was sick a while ago.

At least for a couple of hours as a necromancer it worked pretty well.

For now I went back to PoE with K&M, but I don't rule out, that I might give GD another shot.
And if I do, I will try again with the controller.

Yeah thank you.

The part that I still don't quite get is why giving both people 10 hours of classes is equality but giving both 0 hours of lessons isn't.
(Or giving both kids 1 ladder vs. giving both kids 0 ladders.)

I get that the analogy to a real situation would be to just let inequality run its course and that is obviously not the same as giving everyone the same assistance. I still don't think the picture makes this point very well.

Thank you for taking the time.

I think I get now what panel 2 wants to tell me.
I still think it would make the same point (or a similar one) more clearly if the left child had a ladder from start on.

Then you could see that just equalizing the tools is not enough.
Here I think it looks as if giving tools is worthless to even harmful, which I don't agree with.

But again thank you for writing it up, it was well written and very good to understand for me as a non native speaker.

Thanks for the benefit of the doubt I guess.

I think I will stay at my own conclusion that this picture doesn't do a good job of pointing out the differences between the panels.

They could just as easily have given the left child the ladder from panel 1 on. That would show that just equalizing the tools and assistance doesn't create real justice in a flawed system.
I am not convinced that starting with no tools and assistance (aside from the tree that somehow is assistance in panel 1 and isn't in panel 2) and then giving them both the same ladder makes that point very well.

But maybe I still just don't quite get it.

I did consider no tools on both sides to be equal tools.

Can you maybe eli5 why there is a need to have something in this example?
I just don't get any real difference from the first two panels.

The exact same circumstances that punish the one kid in the first panel still punish them in the second. If anything they are worse off in comparison since the additional provided tools don't serve any purpose for them but do help the other kid.

I really don't mean to be contrarian but I simply don't understand how a leaning tree can be assistance in panel 1 but not in panel 2.

Wouldn't then in the second panel still not be equal assistance?

I didn't think the tree was either a tool or assistance.
Especially since it is still the same in the second panel where tools or assistance are supposed to be equal.

But I am not good at those things. I just don't seem to get it.

Doesn't the first panel also have equal tools and assistance?

Who doesn't know that exact situation.