tiramichu @ tiramichu @lemm.ee

Posts

0

Comments

545

Joined

2 yr. ago

I heard about the diaper thing, it's garbage. Definitely illustrates the point though; Amazon don't care at all because whether they act or don't makes no difference to their bottom line.

Someone comes to Amazon looking for a reusable diaper, they will search and usually buy whatever is near the top of the first page, because that's just what people do. Amazon make a sale and are happy, they don't care who the vendor is.

And oh - Amazon retail has more turnover than AWS but AWS makes more profit.

The number one thing I noticed after installing Linux on my old macbook was that the battery life was immediately halved.

I totally expected that to happen, though, because my previous experience had always been that power management on Linux was kinda terrible.

Time to try this out and see!

“I think the existing, altruistic, free version of Reddit will continue to exist and grow and thrive just the way it has,” Huffman said.

There's nothing 'altruistic' about reddit

Sadly not even new, I've noticed it going on for at least the last five years, if not more. Amazon could easily detect and stop this but they don't because (surprise surprise!) better reviews = more sales, even if it is for the wrong product

Oh yeah, of course. The rich have done a very good job of deflecting blame and convincing people the blame lies elsewhere. Excellent marketing and diversionary tactics.

Just wish people would see through that.

I hate that I have to share a country with these people.

The UK that I grew up in was multicultural, and proud of it. And now this.

So much misplaced anger. Yes the economy is fucked, and your life is probably in the shitter, but immigrants aren't the ones to blame for this. Blame the 1%

I couldn't give two hoots about this, but it's probably a good thing for 'normal' people.

My dad for example can never find a file once it's disappeared from the notifications, so he always just goes back and downloads the file again whenever he needs it, duplicating it over and over because he has no idea "where it went"

It's the same picture

It was weird to me too.

In fairness to the author, I can find a way to speak those two words aloud in a way that works, and sounds like something someone could genuinely say, but that requires a pretty specific stress and pitch.

You're already!

But the first time you read the words it's just not going to come out like that.

And that's the problem. As a writer you can't just put words on the page the same way you yourself might speak them, and expect people to read it that way. The spoken word does not translate perfectly to writing.

You need to have an awareness of how people are likely to parse the words on the page, and choose wording that doesn't cause people to trip or stumble, even if it isn't the exact phrasing you'd use in organic speech.

The comic fails on that at the final line.

It's such a painful thing, and the scary truth is that it can happen to anyone.

I'm sure we've all experienced instances of this, in some smaller and insignificant way.

You take a packed lunch to work. Every day for five years you've taken a lunch to work, without fail. Its part of your routine, you don't even have to think about it. Get your wallet, get your keys, lunch out the fridge and into your bag, out the door.

Then one day you open your bag at lunch-time, and it's not there. Why isn't it there, you think? You remember putting it there like always, but then the memories of different days are all the same as each other, and it just blurs into one.

And then you remember. Just as you picked up your wallet and keys, your phone rang. And it's your Dad, who says he just had someone call to say he needs to transfer money to keep it safe, and you're telling him no no no Dad it's just a scam, don't transfer anything! And you have to go or you'll miss the bus, and did I get my lunch, yes yes I put it in my bag like always.

But you didn't put it in your bag. Its still sitting in the fridge at home.

And obviously a lunch is not a baby. But the principle is the same. That frightening realisation that your own brain didn't merely forget, but actually lied to you about what really happened that morning is the same.

And it could have been a baby instead.

Scary.

I am cat

The findings here seem like a real stretch.

Saying that people can "Accurately" identify names for adults but not children feels tenuous when they only answered correctly less than 25% of the time for children and slightly more than 25% for adults, among four options. That's barely better than random chance.

If there really even is any correlation between name and appearance, then as other people have said, this is likely due to factors of age, and popularity of different names at different times. The child group used children only from a narrow range of 9-12 whereas the adult group was broader, so it would be easier to see the influence of age in the adult group.

I assumed those conducting the study would be very familiar with that bias and try to eliminate it by only using names that were equally popular at the same time as the person's actual age for each question, but I couldn't find that information.

If we assume they DID try to eliminate generational popularity as a factor, there are still more plausible explanations IMO.

For example, different names are going to be popular among different socioeconomic backgrounds - wealth, education, political leaning, geographic location of the parents will all affect name choice!

So if there is any correlation at all, my personal conclusion would not be that the name determines who people grow up to be, but that someone's physical appearance is influenced by their socioeconomic background, and that name also correlates with that background.

So name is simply a predictor for what background someone grew up with, nothing more!

You answered your own question. If OP can't use it, maybe they'll buy a subscription, thinks Adobe.

Super scummy.

Right, and what I'm saying is there's basically zero incentive for corporations to ever take action, because SAYING you will be doing it has all the image, PR and revenue benefits, but without needing to even ACTUALLY do it. And then later you just quietly forget about it, like this.

The only way companies will ever take action is if governments legally mandate them to (and even then maybe not!)

Yep. Any promised future targets are just marketing hype.

Then: "Eco-friendly is really trending now, we'll base our image around that"

Now: "It's more profitable to drop the eco targets, so were dropping them"

Google absolutely made a calculated decision when they decided to allow device manufacturers to fork AOSP and introduce closed-source modifications. If it wasn't for that, I can't imagine OEMs would have wanted to get on board, and so we wouldn't have seen the huge adoption that happened, and Android might have become just another failed operating system.

I do truly wish for a fully open-source "Linux on the phone" type experience, but what always kills that is apps, because companies just don't make them unless the market share is there. Even Microsoft had to pull out after pumping so much money into Windows phone, and I think most of the reason was because they couldn't incentivise developers to make apps enough.

So I'm glad at least I can run Calyx, and have just a tiny bit more freedom while still keeping the apps I need, even if it's nowhere near perfect.

Limited edition 😎

Polyamoury is cool. Cheating is not cool.

That's all it comes down to - consent

If someone needs multiple partners in their life to feel fulfilled, then wonderful, but they just have to make sure that everyone involved is fine with that before they get into the situation.

Is the answer. Cheating is a mechanism to both have their cake, and eat it.

Haha yep. Not the support process you want. Glad you managed to let them eat some humble pie at least.

The support process you want is this: "We'll make you a channel on our Slack, if you've got any issues you can talk with our devs direct!" - yes please!