tillimarleen @ tillimarleen @feddit.de

Posts

3

Comments

99

Joined

2 yr. ago

Not yet. But they do it just in case

It wasn‘t about that of course. I don‘t understand why you’d want to call that person that. Because you think what he said is garbage?

Hey there, for me from the other side of the world further proof that things are largely the same everywhere.

But why produce ammunition yourself, when you can force a whole country to do it. I take it with a grain of salt, but also I don‘t distrust the Intercept: https://theintercept.com/2023/09/17/pakistan-ukraine-arms-imf/

„garbage person“ wow, well done. I wouldn‘t want you on my side

Oh Keir, it‘s hard isn‘t it? Just like with all your other moves lately, you seem to find it so difficult to go into opposition to the fascists. So difficult to quit all these Tory policies that proved disastrous for the country. What is your fucking plan? You think people will vote for yet more neoliberal bullshit? (Not talking about Brexit here)

Yes, antisemitism is racism. But not because of race, race is social construct. Have a look: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Race_(human_categorization)

fair enough

Yes, I have read the article. And this sentence is actually quite interesting. Especially this part: „Several Islamic groups have also condemned the program“. Why also? Admittedly it‘s a bit unclear in the article, but it seems some other people have protested this law, too. Where we get to the point of OP. Conservatism is bad. Whether it is religious or whatever the motivation. Blaming only one religion just serves other conservative narratives

maybe you didn‘t consider all implications of this statement. To make more clear what I meant: maybe regulating capitalism never was the answer, maybe it is time to get rid of the whole shit show.

ah yeah? what is? They obviously don‘t know who did those attacks

what do you want to imply?

maybe regulating has never been the answer

well, you seem to have trouble doing it

Maybe it‘s a legalese explanation of a problematic aspect of the fediverse though. When a commercial entity comes in that deals in people‘s data, which doesn‘t just store data on its servers, but creates a product out of the data. And it seems like it can do that here without you ever agreeing or even knowing about it.

why should it be ok that Meta collects this information though?

but it conserves the status quo

Indeed! Where and when do we meet?

Sorry, I’m not sure what you mean

„They should take care of their own.“ This is at best a naive sentiment. They’re on planet Earth after all. Also, because they’re in Africa, doesn‘t mean other African nations will treat them favourably. Economic interests in this area are huge. That ECOWAS will act in the interest of the people of Niger is highly doubtful.