tias @ tias @discuss.tchncs.de

Posts

1

Comments

832

Joined

2 yr. ago

No I'm not confused about that. I have seen the problems you talk about. That's why I felt the need to qualify modern with "well engineered".

Did you forgot to specify that you're asking about a game? Dungeons and temples don't usually come with a soundtrack.

But there is so much free porn on the internet already

I have a house. But it's old and decaying. I want a well-engineered, modern house with great interior design and lots of space. I want to be able to put the couch in the center of the room instead of putting it up against a wall.

I prefer to call myself egalitarian

The number of assholes calling themselves feminists vastly outnumber the actual feminists. They have lost control of the word.

I love me some multi-meme drifting

What happened?

I hate to break it to you but... millennials are old

Sure, as long as it works. Software has a tendency to stop working on newer OS:es or become subject to security exploits though.

Or more generally, anything that has a beginning has an end

That sounds good on paper, but the chances that someone else will pick up the ball if they abandon it, even if it's open source, are very slim. If you care about keeping it alive then paying them is a more effective strategy than hoping for random volunteer work by internet strangers.

You, on the other hand, have good chances of being able to learn new tools. So I think the need for this security is exaggerated.

The IntelliJ products are not exactly "buy once" - if you want updated versions you need to keep paying periodically.

Not that I think that's a bad thing necessarily - it doesn't make sense to expect devs to continue working on something year after year when you're not paying them for it.

Come on. Public figures need to be able to deal with satire and mockery, and this isn't even a deep cut. Besides, have you seen how Miyazaki treats his family? That man has no empathy or humanity to offer his peers either. He's a stuck up old man that would do well to come down to earth.

Sounds to me like Miyazaki needs to lighten up.

4-hour planning? I wish. Try 16-hour planning.

And also, a meeting to plan for the planning meeting.

The problem is water. It takes up a lot of space and potentially goes bad within a week.

I use it many times a day for coding and solving technical issues. But I don't recognize what the article talks about at all. There's nothing affective about my conversations, other than the fact that using typical human expression (like "thank you") seems to increase the chances of good responses. Which is not surprising since it better matches the patterns that you want to evoke in the training data.

That said, yeah of course I become "addicted" to it and have a harder time coping without it, because it's part of my workflow just like Google. How well would anybody be able to do things in tech or even life in general without a search engine? ChatGPT is just a refinement of that.

The alot looks like it could easily eat 7 tacos and still be hungry

echo "Xft.dpi: 210" >> ~/.Xresources