threeganzi @ threeganzi @sh.itjust.works

Posts

2

Comments

138

Joined

2 yr. ago

Not that I will convince you to use signal, but there are desktop versions as well, so technically not required to use a smart phone.

What about that is Zoroastrian?

Ah, that makes sense

Yeah, pretty much as Flex at 97% which is a nice comparison.

Edit: See mattd’s comment

Do they just reject their requests for benefits, or how does it happen?

What a weird comparison.

Why is that?

Ah, perhaps not as standard as I thought!

They’ll be happy to know the metric system also has miles.

10 km = 1 mile (metric mile)

In a house perhaps?

It’s also very likely that Kamala Harris has voted for men in the past, meaning she would have transitioned to man by now negating the risk of male voters turning into women.

They’re probably waiting for this tech to be required by law and make a lot of cash on the patent.

You’re right, and went back to read again and I totally misread the original article on Pivot to Asia as being more positive to china, which it wasn’t. I apologize for that, and thanks for still keeping up the conversation. I owe you to at least have a look at your last reference.

Just trying to keep up with what message you’re trying to convey. First you said it started during the Obama administration, then you agreed it was later, during the trump administration.

I don’t have time to check even more sources you reference. Feel free to mention why your last source is relevant to our discussion and I might give it a glance. Or at least why it worth a read.

So, based on your source, it’s Trump policy rather than Obama policy?

That sounds like the opposite. In the article they mention changing the policy in 2017. Is that what you mean?

I think it’s easier to have to position that absolute free speech is the best solution if you are not part of a minority group who is the target of hate speech. (Not saying you aren’t)

The definition is tricky and if such law should exist it should have a good margin from being used for arbitrary “I was offended” type of offenses.

I don’t think prison, as you suggested, is a reasonable consequence either.

Yeah, fair, definition can be hard. But to give an example that I think is pretty clear cut: people standing outside of a mosque/synagogue/church arguing that those [certain people] deserve to be dead or put in labor camp.

You could argue that those are just words, and be correct, but for the individuals that are targeted it’s not just words. They know for a fact that those words and ideologies do turn in to actions.

I think it’s easier to have to position that absolute free speech is the best solution if you are not part of a minority group who is the target of hate speech.

Ok, then I’m also curious on how they would solve that.

Will it run locally? I just assumed it would be run on Apple servers in some way.