Skip Navigation

Posts
115
Comments
1,914
Joined
2 yr. ago

  • Sure. But you need to look at it with context. New users have a hard time to remember how its correctly typed as a command, or it can be easily mistyped on a keyboard and not as fluid. These points do not apply to pharma industry and is just one example. Another point is when you do a websearch and what you get as a result. Its a complex topic on its own with many different points in itself.. Just because others have weird and "bad" names, does not mean "we" should do the same. Package managers in an operating system are more than just a brand.

    But as you have a point (in your opinion), I recommend to discuss this in the issue itself with a recommendation of a name, if you have. Or if you like the current (which was actually a placeholder) name. Nothing against opinions, as this is the actual reason why they opened it up.

  • My point is that Fish is not standard Linux tool. If the goal is to learn more about Linux, it makes more sense to learn about Bash first. I'm not against Fish. For a newcomer its just confusing when researching stuff or reading others scripts in Bash and constantly think about the differences in Bash and Fish. Or if you want to share a script with someone who does not have Fish. I'm not saying Fish is bad or anything like that. I'm just saying for a newcomer its not a good idea to ignore Bash and learn Fish first for someone who is interested into learning more about Linux and its eco system. Fish itself has the better language, no doubt about it and is actually better than Bash. But the quality is not my main concern in the reply.

  • I'm curious and tried the AppImage of current development version. Unfortunately it hang in the settings menus with following message, and kind of maxing out my CPU usage and making it a 0.5 fps slideshow. I waited 10 minutes or so and then forcibly killed the process. Clicking the buttons or interacting with anything didn't do anything. Guess I have to wait until full release. Not sure if this is a problem with the development build or my system:

  • To be honest, this is my recommendation as well. If you kill Windows and can't play your favorite games, then its more likely to give up Linux.

  • Just type type type type all those commands until remembering them is muscle memory.

    For learning purposes, also try not to use aliases. Because using alias would undermine the learning process of knowing what and how its been done. I recommend (as you said) typing it out over and over again and use aliases on a later stage of your Linux learning only (maybe after weeks at least).

  • Install the fish shell, it makes using the terminal waaay easier, out of the box.

    Not a good idea if the goal is to learn more about Linux. Fish is not compatible to and is different to Bash in some ways, that it would be hard once not using Fish. Also getting help or sharing scripts with others will be problematic, when having a problem and researching it. For someone coming in to Linux and wanting to learn about it, I highly recommend to learn about Bash first and use it at least for months before even thinking about a custom shell. I used Fish too (and I miss some features), so its not like I wouldn't know what it is.

    Install Alpaca flatpak, and use tinyllama or bigger LLM models.

    Alpaca is nice. GPT4All is also another one (and one that I prefer). Either way, both are good. But again like previous point, I do not recommend to install and use Ai modesl (LLMs) to learn about Linux and to get used to it. Especially the smaller models often hallucinate and lie with false claims. If you don't know it better and are currently learning, this could be a problem. I highly discourage from installing and learning with an Ai model alongside when you are new to a topic like Linux. Its also not like there wouldn't be enough good material out there anyway.

  • I thought about integrating the name OpenSuse too. But there was some legal problems by Suse itself. OpenSuse should change their name and brand, not sure if this is still asked to do so.

  • Easy to type and being searchable, and not associated with other existing projects or malicious software are only some of the requirements. A good name is important and does matter.

  • It was more than just a name and brand change, such as a workflow and look similar to Photoshop. And they had plans to introduce new functionality.

  • The non destructive filter was already implemented and is not new in RC2. So I assume whats new is the GEGL filters new API.

  • It's a mostly bug fix version of the prior release candidate. So there is not much new stuff to talk about. The only thing I want to mention is, that GIMP 3 makes me believe in Half-Life 3 again.

  • Permanently Deleted

    Jump
  • Why would they? While I sometimes believe that Gnome devs are childish, however I do not think they are angry or like that for making a hard fork and supporting and developing a software they do not care about anymore. If anything, that takes ton of shit against Gnome 3+ away, because people could switch to Cinnamon if they do not like Gnome's new direction. It would have been much worse for Gnome if there was no fallback option.

  • Realistic does not equal to good looking. In example Zelda Breath of the Wild looks good, but its hardly realistic. And if all games are very realistic, then it gets a little bit boring, as all games start to look the same. The AAA gaming industry is too much focused on lip sync, realistic faces, grass and puddles. I don't feel like getting lost in a game, but more like watching a movie. It's so boring to me (I'm looking at you Red Dead Redemption 2).

  • Debian is an immutable distribution. Change my mind.

  • I used Simple Tabs Group before, but its been a while. And with my quick testings of the new Tab Groups, its not quite the same. For one the Tab Groups are integrated into the Tabs itself and not a separate menu. You may like it or not. Overall Simple Tabs Group has much more configuration and options.

    But overall it does the basic job of this addon. The biggest plus for me is, that I do not have to install and configure a third party addon, and trust it. I predict most people would not need such an addon anymore, if they don't want to deep dive too much.

  • I strongly disagree with the premise that there’s a “wrong” way to play retro games.

    I understand your sentiment here and you are right too. What I think is, that the wording on this title here is misunderstood. Emulating (old) games without Shaders is not faithful or accurate in the looks. It looks "vastly" different and thus means it looks "wrong". I interpret the "wrong" in the title as "not faithful", instead as "bad", like this: You're Probably Emulating Retro Games Not Faithful (you need CRT Shaders for the oldschool look)