I'll keep saying it. Let's have a journal system for negative results and replication studies. Give partial credits for it relative to journal papers with novelty.
So if you have an idea you can search there, see if someone has tried it and failed, and how they failed. You can also search a certain paper and see if people have replicated the study.
I was on a car from ride sharing app recently, and there was a tablet in front of me playing ads continuously for the whole ride. Asked the driver to turn it off and he said, "I have to keep it on". I know it's not the requirement from the app, so honestly how dystopian is it?
The way things are going people can't afford anything and will have ads blasting in front of them for discounts.
Drop in valuation doesn't matter as much. It's the relative portions they have. If everyone is poor by 10%, poor people will lose a few (hundreds) dollars and they'll lose trillions. If they lose 5% and everyone else lost 20%, they're winning. They're richer than they were. Numbers might make it seem like they're worse. Don't buy into it.
Doesn't need that complex algorithm here because streetlight is static (the walkways don't change), so all you need is just a different light design for each. Or maybe a modular source you can change while installing.
Yeah, and there's no plan to stabilize the ABI because it's developing.
You can use C ABI for some data formats, but you're limited on what you can use (mostly primitives). There's a crate stable-abi or abi-stable that provides a way to do things to keep it stable, but since it's external crate it has limitations.
I know it's frustrating because I am writing something in rust that loads functions in runtime. I thought it'd be easy because programs written in C do it all the time. Rust gives a lot of advantages but working on dynamic loading hasn't been fun. And there aren't a lot of resources about this either.
Yup. I made a scientific analysis program. Using CLI and your own editors you can do so much. And instead of focusing on making the algorithms, I had to focus on making a GUI for months because people need things to click.
And then even with very responsive and easy GUI, with like just 5 types of "views" and probably like <5 buttons/inputs each, people are like "it seems complicated" within like 1 minutes of demo. They haven't even tried to use it or tried to learn anything. I even modeled the views to be as similar to another software they use.
Laughs at opening PDF in a text editor and manually reading/editing things. (It was a bit complicated problem that made me do these things and don't recommend it)
Yup, when I heard about it it was really weird. And when I said I won't let my children do that, I learn they'd be ostracized not only by peers but by teachers as well. And considering there'll bullying in schools and teachers don't do much. It doesn't seem like a good place to send your children. (And there's shooting)
IIRC Same compiler version doesn't mean the ABI will be the same. Each compilation may produce different representation of data structures in the binary. Depending on the optimization and other things.
It's actually true because in my laptop I feel powerful, I have so many things to do and the choices. In my phone I'm at the mercy of apps and algorithms.
Honestly there's probably something similar already. Because the loans are already a way to keep people in the country. You increase the educational expenses by a lot, make people take loans, and then make them pay a lot more after graduation. Since other countries have cheap/free education they don't offer high salaries, so people don't leave your country to work on other countries coz they can't pay those loans on low salary.
Anything that keeps a clear record of what people say or believe in, without that changing based on someone's mood on a particular day is going to be a flop on that side of the spectrum.
It was there since a long time. People coming to US are warned by foreign organizations about the port checking the contents of their phone, text, photos, apps etc. It just didn't happen as often as it does now.
I'll keep saying it. Let's have a journal system for negative results and replication studies. Give partial credits for it relative to journal papers with novelty.
So if you have an idea you can search there, see if someone has tried it and failed, and how they failed. You can also search a certain paper and see if people have replicated the study.
It'll help everyone immensely.