theunknownmuncher @ theunknownmuncher @lemmy.world

Posts

3

Comments

552

Joined

1 yr. ago

Oh wow!!! Not wanting to violate the law by arresting and deporting an American citizen??? The absolute bare minimum and what should be the literal default for everyone in public office??? 👀

Dude.

Let me know when Hakeem Jefferies endorses Zohran Mamdani.

"Vote blue no matter who" for me but not for thee!!

So, seems like you admit that you're wrong and there AREN'T only 2 possible models for the Internet.

So why are you here? Freeloading while you can before the fediverse implodes?

My question still stands

there are only 2 possible models for the Internet

Seems like you're proven wrong by the very website you're posting the theory to

And which of those 2 models for the Internet does Lemmy, the website before your eyes that you're currently using, fit into? 🙃

We’ve also probably got viruses as a permanent part of our genome from some ancestor species.

We definitely have viruses as a permanent part of our genome. A type of herpes virus is present in the DNA of all living things descended from bony fishes

No Man's Sky was one of the most hyped video games in history due to procedural generation. The fact that they botched it on release is not relevant.

Ngl I stopped reading your comments after you equated generative AI to slavery and revealed that you are a troll arguing in bad faith

The funny part is the leak could only have come from inside his administration and party because he withheld briefings from his political opponents

They were both posted by the same user

It's literally just implementation and they're both statistical models, but 👍

If you disagree, explain how. I'll wait

no wonder you hail AI as good

When, exactly, did I? I called them both janky dogshit, but simply pointed out the very real hypocrisy of supporting procedural generation while hating generative AI.

Literally everything you just said applies to procedural generation, except that it is demonic because that's just silly

by your logic, slavery would be excusable. That's the argument you're making.

I'm sorry, we're talking about the implementation of generated content in video games. That only works if it's EQUIVALENT to slavery, it's not (which you yourself said in an attempt to have it both ways lol), so "my logic" does not apply to slavery... Dude.

Yes, of course I did, it would be gross of me to let that slide

Totally valid, mutually conceded. I'd bet we can agree that the current climate of games generally praises procedurally generated content, regardless of how we experienced its history.

👀 SLAVERY??? Come on man. Outrageous.

theunknownmuncher thinks it's somehow inconsistent to be against generative AI while being ok with procedural generation, which implies that they think they're equivalent in some way.

It's genuinely wild that you wrote this and then minutes later tried to make a "comparison but totally NOT equivalency, guys" to SLAVERY. 🤦🤦🤦

EDIT: btw, not that it matters at this point, but that's not what a simile is. It is analogy, though, but a super flawed and shitty one

Your previous comment proved my point, thanks

both are used to produce more content with less effort. There's your equivalence.

Bingo.

As if the reason people don't like generative AI is because it makes bad games.

Nice, point proven. 😎 If it doesn't make games bad, then the complaints are simply invalid and bandwagoning, and developers cannot be faulted for using it. LOL

I'm not and it's always been consistently praised.