thenightisdark @ thenightisdark @lemmy.world

Posts

0

Comments

76

Joined

2 yr. ago

Why do you say that?

What about it? Going to go bang, explosions are fun. Shooting people bad. What else did you want to know?

-signed Bleeding heart lefty with a gun

There are many problems with Airbnb, but let's be fair no one's getting kicked out for having four phones.

It's a straw man argument to say that this is Not for the places that end up with 25 phones.

This is an attempt to keep party houses under control. I can see how one could argue for and/or against this but let's be clear what it's about. 👍😁

For what it's worth I wouldn't mind banning cars but keeping guns.

Having guns keeps the working man having power.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Four_boxes_of_liberty

There are four boxes to be used in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, and cartridge. Please use in that order.

The "cartridge" option is more important than almost anything else. Besides jury boxes and ballot boxes.

Some very good points, and well written

https://hobbycents.com/hobby-guides/driving-hobby-guide/

https://www.theintelligentdriver.com/2023/01/12/5-fun-and-interesting-hobbies-for-driving-enthusiasts-to-try-out/

Cars kill in the same numbers are guns, and are a hobby..... just saying

How do you do " can make that happen and still get rid of"

Explain please.

Because I have the right to get a manufacturer that is not liable. Much like my ability to get a car is based on the fact that auto manufacturers not liable My ability to get a gun is absolutely reliant upon gun manufacturers not being liable.

You are not participating in a good faith discussion if you don't acknowledge that making guns manufacturers liable will remove my choice to shoot paper.

You're proposal will affect me, at least if you're arguing in good faith.

I use guns to shoot paper. Your argument for what guns are created for is flawed. My gun is not created for the ending of human lives.

My gun was made to end paper from being completely without holes.

Are you saying that my use of the gun is wrong? Or am I allowed to have a gun that is not used for killing?

-Signed a bleeding heart lefty with a gun

What? Damns have nothing to do with nuclear. You're thinking of in Ukraine and that's unique situation. Also that dam was blown up and the nuclear power plant didn't explode.

Take the nuclear titties near me, not a dam in sight.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/San_Onofre_Nuclear_Generating_Station

I agree we need help now. There's a reason it comes so far in the future and all of them are artificial.

If we really wanted to we could build safe nuclear tomorrow. Okay that's a bit of an exaggeration but you know what I mean.

In my opinion clean is anything that doesn't emit out of smokestacks.

Also in this case it doesn't emit out of smoke stacks while the sun's down and the wind's not blowing.

Dams are terrible for the environment so hydro is out. Nuclear is cleaner than hydro.

Building More nuclear will help with climate warming. None of your links deal with that.

At least for men. I'm very certain this is one of the cases where science is done upon men. Men don't have good mechanism of getting rid of iron, but women do. 👍

Well using inflation, if I have the phone for the two years at the end of the two years I'm paying back with money that's worth less.

I personally don't do it but it is literally good value because you pay back with money that is worth less - future money

Anti-aircraft is different than air assets I get it that both are AA but I meant an air assets not anti-aircraft. 👍

Wagner group doesn't have any air assets, the Air Force probably could annihilate them on the way to Moscow. Not much cover in Russia