Comedian Russell Brand charged with rape
People aren't monsters or lazy - people generally just chug along. Obviously, stress, living conditions, and morale affect performance, but that's not the real problem
People do what they can when they're given. And nearly across the board, what are they given? Fewer workers to produce ever more, faster, with cheaper tools and supplies. And they ramp up the pressure, encourage turnover, refuse to listen to the actual workers on the ground, and just generally don't give workers what they need to properly and reliably do the job
Hence the feathering. Nothing like having everyone come together to publically and physically humiliate you to make you rexamine your ass backwards opinions... Or at least learn to keep them hidden deep down
They can slap a Ford sticker on their cyber truck and people will probably leave them alone.
This is contributing to making a billionaire bringing on fascism go bankrupt... Yeah, I don't love personal property damage, but they're disappearing people.
If you've got a Tesla, spend 20 minutes and $20 bucks and buy a sticker to disavow the company... Otherwise I really can't bring myself to care
I mean, that score supposedingly means you struggle to put together normal sentences... So I'd assume it's satire
I mean... What's the alternative? Cows are also somewhat effected, while being way way less efficient or healthy
Beans are great, I'm all for reducing meat consumption
People will become malnourished when they can't get basic foods. They can't just work it out... Nutrition is so much more than raw calories
I mean...gyro support is such a niche thing. The PS3 controller introduced gyro support - what used it? There's examples, but not many, because most games are made to be multi platform, and programming in gyro controls is a lot harder than most other controls
Nintendo is an exception because they have a lot of exclusives - gyro support is a lot more appealing to implement if all of the devices have it, plus they probably encouraged it
I wouldn't worry about it too much, the incentive for exclusives to have it remains, this is a tool for porting to the switch and exploring new control schemes more than anything else
Nah, that ship has sailed. They'll never cut diplomatic ties, because why would they?
They've already decided they need to come together to live in a world without the US... They're already making trade deals and new defense pacts, they're already planning around us
There's so much to unpack in such a short statement
There's two kind of "both sides"... There's "we need a middle ground" which is horse shit, it leads to a choice between fascism and fascism-light
Then there's "our politicians are decrepit zombies, so let's do a leftist version of the tea party"
People want change, not stability. Not anymore. Everything sucks, so who are they going to vote for... An openly fascist snake oil salesman saying he's going to fix everything, or someone composed insisting things aren't as bad as they seem?
It's a toss up, apparently.
Change. Remember that campaign slogan? Because it won, and Obama delivered so little of it
If a sandwich shop gives you food poisoning, you absolutely should be telling people not to eat there. You should leave reviews and tell people every time the name comes up
The logic you're using is "well, what if the shop closes down and people can't get sandwiches at all? What if they're forced to eat at the numerous food stands that also give you food poisoning?"
If you say nothing, people are going to look at the sandwich shop sign and think it's safer than the street food... That's not better
To get away from the metaphor, harshly condemning Schumer at every turn would definitely do something. It sends a message that "this isn't what you can expect from Democrats"
You say everyone knows who the real leaders of the party are...I literally don't even know the second name there, I know AOC because she does good messaging about who she is and what she stands for. And I pay attention
Most people don't even know who their representative is, but they're much more likely to know who Schumer and Pelosi are. And they hate them.
This shady shit is why people hate the Democrats. When someone hands Trump everything he wants without a fight, they try to downplay it, like people haven't noticed. They don't punish it, they barely mention it - they're so desperate to not shake the boat that they do nothing
Democrats need to shake the boat and make enemies... That's what wins elections today. They need to call people out, and tell them what they stand for, and then they need to follow through
Because "once you enter you never leave". You can argue that prison is a necessary evil, but you can't argue it's not evil
On that point, Schumer flipped (and whipped up enough traitors to pass the bill) in like the 12 hours before the vote. They had been talking about this since the inauguration, as the time when they'd finally be able to force the Republicans back to the table and do something
There's no way he didn't get a call from someone.
Then he meets with Trump, goes on a talk show tour to try to justify his actions, and the Democratic establishment held their breath to see if people would buy it. They still aren't coming out hard against him... The condemnations are lukewarm and hesitant at best from party leadership.
No, they gave MAGA everything they wanted. They didn't even get to give input on the spending bill. This isn't 5D chess, this isn't a strategic play... It was just total capitulation
And the party still wants to wait and see if Schumer can salvage his reputation, if they can sweep this utter betrayal under the rug
Fuck no. This is exactly the time to hold their feet to the fire and demand they be better and do more... They're handing everything over to the fascists to try to get the oligarchs back on their side
The last thing we should do is believe they're an effective resistance
If I hadn't just seen an announcement about gpt-5 that ended with "I guess I'm retiring" this probably would've got me
Deleted
Permanently Deleted
Jump
Okay... But how much of that is realized?
Before, you told a doctor where to call to get your past records... Now, you tell your doctor where to request your past records. If your doctor works in the same healthcare system campus, they might get them automatically, past that it might happen behind the scenes if you get a referral
Backups are true... Except everyone has their own proprietary formats that require specific software to access the data, and if one of those companies go under, then what?
Access controls and tracking are true, but what's digital can be hacked or leaked. Paper is far more secure - maybe they can phish one person's records more easily without it, but the wrong IT person (who is multiple steps removed) can leak the whole database
I'm not saying paper is better - I'm saying electronic medical records are such a garbage fire in implementation that they bog down the healthcare part of healthcare. They eliminate jobs by automating processeses, but they end up getting rid of support staff in exchange for making the healthcare workers do more work
And I'm not saying it couldn't be better - I'm saying that it's just such a mess of proprietary software and regulation that it became one more layer of wealth extraction that bogs down actual healthcare
Deleted
Permanently Deleted
Jump
Yeah, but like... Are they really? No two systems communicate, every hospital configures even the same systems to be essentially incompatible, and the system is built as if it's all seamless
It's so bad. Paper records in a secure central database would be an improvement - 20 years of this and bending over harder for insurance companies is the only change
Oh, you're missing the most important part of the meta:
CEO: We just did that the consulting company told us
Consulting company: We just make recommendations
I mean, the pathology goes so much deeper.
Musk's family hates him. Like they actively go out of their way to speak against him. His father tweets shit about him, his grown children want nothing to do with him but will speak out against him, his ex... Well you could fill a book with that. His mother and his youngest child (who he uses like a prop) are the only ones that haven't publicly worked against him
What friends does he have? His billionaire buddies will make moves with him, but we've seen the text chains - it's all business. They barely react when he goes against his word... They congratulated him for buying Twitter himself after making plans to go into it together that he backed out of - no way that wasn't a backhanded compliment
Trump hates his guts... But sucks up to him. What friends does he have? He has sycophants, he has people eager to use him... But every relationship he has is based around the fact he's the richest billionaire. If he loses that, what does he have? Who does he have?
Her skin is actually very rough, like sandpaper. You're thinking of sharks, they're very smooth
Yeah, read the new testament sometime without commentary. It's short, Jesus is based as hell, and it gives useful tips like how to resist an occupying force that is looking for people to make examples of
Like if you actually followed Jesus's teachings, in America today you might gather your community together, build a mutual aid network with the intention to become self sufficient, and when ICE comes around everyone swarms them offering to help guide them around and shoving their IDs in their faces without being asked (with suspicious knowledge of the law and careful documentation of them breaking it to report them later) (and obviously with the people at risk nowhere to be found)
Jesus was killed as a revolutionary for a reason, they later massacred the early church communities entirely because it actually became a threat to Rome