themurphy @ themurphy @lemmy.ml

Posts

2

Comments

465

Joined

1 yr. ago

Lol, not it person. But the other comments dosent even know who he is on YouTube.

Alright, I'll give you the only non-grumpy answer here apparently, from someone who actually knows him.

His name is Jimmy. He loves YouTube, and want to make the best videos possible.

He lived with his mom and brother in his childhood. No mention of a father. He played a little baseball, and besides that he really just wanted to make video content. The family was not rich.

His first brand deal he got, he received 10.000 dollars from a sponsor. He gave it all away to someone and filmed it, gaining another brand deal that then got better and better because he gained more viewers.

The concept today for almost all of his videos is "game show". Which means you almost always have a chance to win money. Sometimes he also just gave it random on the street.

He also is a part of Team Trees and Save the Ocean, doing some environmental work in his videos.

Now, Jimmy aka MrBeast has a philanthropy channel, where he hired two individuals to go and give money away around the world to poor villages in 3rd world countries.

He also sells chocolate from sustainable cocoa farms, that is also gentle to the stomach (Jimmy has a stomach disease, don't remember the name).

So yeah, that's MrBeast. He uses all his time and money on videos, and he himself live in a little bunker close to the film studio. He owns almost nothing for himself, but he does own the biggest YouTube brand there is.

Hope it helped.

Who cares who develops it first.

Fusion will generate power for the whole world, and it will be the end of basically all coal power plants. This will benefit EVERYONE.

Fossil fuels won't go away from one day to another tho. It will take forever for all countries to transition to basically infinite electrical power, and we don't have enough EV's on the road just yet to replace oil. Then there's planes, ships and trucks we need to look at.

So who cares who develops it. China at least will provide it for the people, while the US will stall it to sell more oil.

I think the guy above is just mad he can't figure out how to use it. Always easier to be mad at the tool.

So is Trump, but see how that went.

I'm not working in tech either. Everyone relying on a computer can use this.

Also, medicin and radiology are two areas that will benefit from this - especially the patients.

Same, I've automated alot of my tasks with AI. No way 77% is "hampered" by it.

Iran and Turkey would be a better place, that's for sure. Especially Iran was a free country, women rights and everything. Now priests control the country, and women are getting killed for not wearing their clothing "correct".

Also, the whole western world entered the "dark ages" which was a big push backwards in terms of living standards and science. That was because of religion, so we might be 100-200 years ahead now, if it wasn't for that.

Well, it only gives a bigger reason for other search engines to index the competition.

Doesn't really matter what you write in. The higher the % is for votes on non of the candidates, the more likely is the change.

We are basically training their models/bots for them.

It's just an excuse.

They will be hard to deal with, but for the first time ever, they need to learn compromise.

It also opens up for legitimate third part candidates in next Senate election.

Can't you vote for anyone else then?

More like it shows dangers of using only one provider for almost all IT infrastructure.

Yeah, and if that's the case, it seems like people just hate AI for the sake of it now.

LLM's are actually good at some things. Just not everything.

Interesting, do you know what happened to it?

Both this and x-rays in general are very great use cases for AI, as it can spot and identify 100x faster and more accurate than humans.

I think they already are implementing it around the world in a small scale so far.

Closing accounts also means losing users. If the number is high enough, they want enforcement rather than banning.

It's always profits in the end.

I don't think I get what you mean, when I only named consumer rights against companies and eco friendly laws?

Can you specify why it's bad and who the EU is trying to hurt with this?

That's true, but it's also true that China has prioritised to make automated factories and investing heavily in just plain better battery tech.

I know alot of the money came from the CCP, but when the investments are done, this new tech will outperform other companies on just being better (thinking of EV specifically).

I think I'm just saying that a state investing in tech and technologies is not a bad idea always.