themajesticdodo @ themajesticdodo @lemmy.world

Posts

0

Comments

126

Joined

2 yr. ago

Bro. Read. Read the article.... So desperate to say something you'll say anything at all, even if you appear stupid.

She's in severe mental decline? I thought the article made that pretty clear.

What does your comment have to do with the article? She's 94 and is pretty obviously in mental decline...

"He's a rapist."

If I wrote an article about you with an accusation of rape, would that also make you a rapist? Is that the standard of proof required?

Looking objectively at her odds of winning her next election, she won't.

You’re quip about friends tells me that you’re either young, or unsure of what a friend truly is. I’m not talking about people you know and see sometimes. I’m talking about if you were in jail and needed 500 bail at 2 am. How many people could you call that aren’t family?

I've read and laughed at this three times already.

It sounds like you and your "friends" are terrible people. Stop getting arrested and apologising for rapists you sick fuck.

Was that supposed to prove she's a national spokesperson?

If we’re using statistics to cull creatures, racists are going to have a field day.

Did you just insinuate black people commit more crime?

Comparing other races to dogs is pretty fucked up to start with.

But don’t take my word for it, here’s their 2022 impact report. https://www.thorn.org/impact-report-2022/

".....but don't take my word for it... Take theirs!"

Funny

Haha, well you are the joker, so maybe I can borrow yours?

It's OK. You can take your time crafting a reply. Don't feel you have to go with the first one you think of.

Just stop. You can't even put a decent argument together and you aren't helping anyone. Please, just stop.

Assuming an average lifespan of roughly 10 years, there’s a roughly 1 in 1,000 chance that a given pit bull will ever attack a human or animal.

So 1 in every 1000 will attack a human? Is that actually a good argument for pit bulls?

That is not a good argument, it is dishonest and disingenuous.

You're actually using the same logic people used to try and avoid gay marriage.

You literally looked at the numbers they produced, ignored that and locked onto a tiny portion of their comment.

You, ma'am, are not arguing in good faith.

There’s a whole bunch of countries where they wouldn’t even think of regulating them as pets because dogs are purely working animals or feral.

Don't stop there, champ. Which countries?

I hope you're a thirteen year old otherwise this is some sad, pathetic shit.

I have no clue.

Correct. You fucking sure don't.

I don’t have many friends. The few I have I like a lot, and would go to great lengths to help them. If one of my friends asked me to write a letter to a judge. Even if I knew they did it. I’d write that letter. I would do and have done far crazier, and morally dubious thangs than that to help or protect a friend.

What about if your friend raped children? Would you still be ok with that? Or are you only OK with it if they rape adults? Just trying to work out exactly where people like you draw the line.

PS: You didn't need to include the part about not having many friends, it's heavily implied by the rest of your comment.

Imagine if he was asked to write a letter of support, but then thought, "No. That's a bad idea".

Would people still be angry then?

Idiot.

Do you know anything about the charity? Or just what his PR team sold you?