thedruid @ thedruid @lemmy.world

Posts

0

Comments

640

Joined

4 mo. ago

Stop gaslighting.

If that's what this article was, that's what it would say.

But you And I read the article. Time to take the keys from grandpa, he squinted at the t. V .

That's what it says.

Seniority and ageism are not

This isn't about seniority. Its a blatant and bigoted ageism piece. Lipstick on a pig, but hey it's just old people who have given their lives.

Screw them. After x age they should go

That's what this, and you , are truly saying.

Goof day

It's not different. .it's lobbying for unelected people to decide in the shadows what should be done loudly on television by people we directly voted for

Anything else is trump. 2.0

As a proud person who is riddled with adhd, depression and anxiety , I welcome the looks on their face when my I. Q is demonstrably far higher than the yahoos in office.

Maybe we should change the low I. Q part to, " moraly bankrupt greedy criminals" and we can get some improvements

Do we start with the Whitehouse?

So the answer is to be ageist instead of administering civics and leadership ability test to the prospective candidates

Got it. Swap bigotry for bigotry.

Way to do better, people

No, child, you are being petulant and spoiled. You want more treason and chaos because you are upset at the president. And you not only have every right, I am as well

But the answer isn't to destroy our government even more

It's to remove the administration before they do more damage. A private army run by people who can make any law without answering to civilian?

You are giving the government what they want. Mire thugs, less accountability, and more cash.

It's a foolish, poorly thought out proposal that creates vastly more problems

Now I am through being reasonable Bout this subject. If you do not know how the government works and why we as citizens need to stand and fight instead of the courts, then you are one of the issues.

I truly do wish you the best. I will not waste more time on this.

Courts uphold laws created by Congress. Not the other way around.

Without their function of upholding the law, they cease to function as courts and, instead become another dictatorial arm of the government merely giving out edicts with no authority.. There's the whole giving courts private army, problems.

The government needs less of this, not more

Umm. I think you have your facts mistaken or are speaking of something other than jurisprudence.

That's a different statement. Yes they need to act before it's too late, no they cannot act alone

I understand and support your irritation and disgust at this administration

But this is not how the court works. They could , hire some contractors I guess, but they cannot unilateraly create a security service

The courts is not the same as the dems

better than yours

you do you want something done that the courts won't do

No. See the courts don't make law. They interpret it. But they can't ignore the constitution or they wouldn't be courts.

Because then, they wouldn't be the courts

The mistake your making is looking at the subject. The courts won't do something unconstitutional. TRUMP will

So until the courts play the game of "no law" they HAVE to do that.

WE don't.

They can't. Congress has to do that.

Not a bad solution either

Either way works for me