thedirtyknapkin @ thedirtyknapkin @lemmy.world

Posts

5

Comments

476

Joined

2 yr. ago

"a fantastic year for new games"? i couldn't disagree more. i had no interest in any games that came out this year. i got balatro, and it's kind of fun, but in a mildly addictive mobile game kind of way. not a "this is a really well made game" kind of way.

to me this was a year of greedy disappointments and corporate bullshit in gaming. this article mentions score inflation being a thing they're weary of, then unironically puts the latest destiny dlc above 90%. pcgamer is absolutely part of the corporate megastructure that is bad for games and for for profits.

i mean, maybe if you're a persona fan, but i just can't get in to those games, i tried 3 of them.

that's not actually a common issue...

that's a lot of effort to ask of someone just because you like it. it feels like khaleesi requiring people to use her full title all the time. you and i are just a standard part of language that don't diminish what one is. i am no less my name and my identity because i use i and me. those words just exist to make speaking easier and less clunky. and as i mentioned before, they're such standard and thoughtless parts of language that it genuinely takes a lot of effort to avoid them for just one person. so I'll use drag instead of any gendered pronouns, but you is just part of the English language that you don't have a good reason for me to put that effort into avoiding.

so I'll take you up on your former offer of not using drag instead of you. I won't misgender you and call you something you're not, but you're still you. that's not inaccurate. I'm not misidentifying you by saying that. I'm just not calling you you're full title every time i speak. to me this is the same as not calling someone sir just because they think they deserve special treatment.

I'll try, i don't want to be disrespectful and I'm sorry if my tone has been a bit heavy.

can drag try to help me understand why drag feels that way? why don't first person pronouns work for drag.

and man, it's hard to avoid words that one uses through habit without thinking. I've had to edit this like five times to catch all of the "you's". it's just not a layer of consciousness in my brain. i have to kind of break my brain to stop saying "you". it feels like having to avoid saying "the"

I'm sorry i don't know what person independent pronouns are. i am not deep in the trans community. I'm just trying to understand. being aggressive like this about genuinely complicated and nuanced things that 90% of the population doesn't understand is a big part as what pushes people away from understanding.

why do they exist though? is it like a split personality thing? what does it mean to not identify with first person pronouns? just towing the line and doing what I'm told isn't my style. i need to understand what I'm saying. it's like the difference between using a math formula and understanding how it works. i don't like using words that I don't understand.

i and me aren't gendered pronouns. you're just using the third person...

pronoun replacements like that are for he/him/her/herself/whatever. unless you're implying that you aren't you somehow? replacing first person pronouns like that just means you're using the third person all the time.

why do you feel the need to do that? what is wrong with i and me? is "you' out of bounds too?

i mean, this is also a handled. if we look at the way they name their handhelds then switch 2 may not be it, but switch extra or switch (new feature here) would be very in line with their names. Nintendo ds, ds lite, 3ds, others? Gameboy, Gameboy color, Gameboy advance, Gameboy advance sp - particularly egregious.

why do you refer to yourself in the third person? and why did you link to that comment thread at almost the end? i had to hit "show context" like 15 times to have any idea what the fuck was happening.

neither of these things are helping with people's confusion. you are aggressively insisting that everyone understands and agrees with your viewpoint on a niche side of a niche community. you can't expect people to understand the context without being deeeeep in that community. this is probably one of the most trans friendly spaces on the Internet. calling the space generally transphobic is a little too victim complexy.

anything that's more of a safe space than this is going to be a complete and total echo chamber with no opposing or dissenting views on anything whatsoever. if you want to go somewhere where people can't disagree with you, it sounds like your own discord server where you can ban people for that is the only option.

this is by far one of the most credible news organizations in the world. and one of the least ad infested old media sites.

calm down.

sure, but that's not his fault.

Amazon's bullshit goes waaay past retail though. and they did to independent online stores what Walmart did to brick and motor stores, but even more blatantly and directly. just look at what they did to diapers.com

the real scary part of Amazon is how much control they have through Amazon Web services. i get a chill every time i remember that Jeff bezos controls one of the largest backbones of the Internet. like imagine if Walmart owned the highways...

there's also the fact that dji released its first large form factor commercial lifting drones just a couple of years back. those things are big and bright and fast and typically used in areas where you wouldn't expect to see drones otherwise. they've quickly been getting more and more popular for so many uses. from painting roofs and tall buildings to clearing snow from power lines. they're starting to show up everywhere.

i bet these alien conspiracy theorists would shit themselves if they saw one of those hauling a crate in the distance. or God forbid, spraying "mysterious" chemicals on our food supply (fertilizer).

anyone got a link to the bluesky thread instead of a paywalled article lazily writing about a social media post?

honestly.... you probably shouldn't leave rakes on the ground where people can step on them. you may not be culpable of murder for it, but it's still a shitty thing to do.

if you leave a rake on the ground and someone steps on it and trips and dies would you be guilty of murder? no it's a freak accident that you couldn't have possibly predicted. the difference is when you can see it happening and don't pick the rake back up after it happens 3 times. what we're talking about here aren't freak accidents where someone dies once. were talking about systemic problems that are easily identified and proven but aren't fixed because it's more profitable not to. that's where you become culpable.

so i guess you become a murderer after you refuse to pick up the rake that has killed 1000 people because of where you intentionally left it. especially when you're the only one that is allowed to pick up the rake.

you know, i wouldn't expect that. however, anecdotally, all of the heavy smokers I know were already heavy smokers before legalization. I only know one person who began consuming marijuana regularly after legalization.

as much as i hate the "both sides are the same" argument when it comes to actual individual politicians, their actions, and policies. this is the one thing that the vast majority of them do have in common. taking billionaire money and letting it affect their decisions.

we were fucked as soon as citizens United passed. that was probably the inflection point that made violent revolution inevitable. when political bribes became legal.

what, you're saying you haven't aged 38 years in the last 10? i aged that much in the last 5 years.

yeah seriously, not only is that a gorgeous cat, but that kitchen looks incredible.

there's no roll Ins you can sneak out during?

if only my professional software supported it...