thecrotch @ thecrotch @sh.itjust.works

Posts

2

Comments

649

Joined

2 yr. ago

He bombed hospitals, schools, weddings and killed tens of thousands of civilians. What part of that don't you consider bad?

You're really going hard on the whataboutism, huh?

That's a pretty huge leap from "Obama is a garbage human being and doesn't deserve our support"

I think it's ok to dislike people who murder thousands of civilians.

Can't understand why. He's a terrible person. He's just Bush's bloodlust dressed up in a more charismatic package.

And that excuses him bombing a doctor's without borders hospital?

That's not enough to support yourself in many places.

Please name one of those places.

Obama's a terrible person who killed tens of thousands of civilians, we should be boycotting any new project he's involved with. The man ought to be tried for war crimes.

I did, and it's a lot cheaper than coke.

I was playing a little game of "Teenager, crackhead, or nutcase?" with this post, then I checked your history and it's all starting to make sense

Work 18 hours, spend it on blow, crash in the alley by the dumpsters, wake up, work another 18 hours.

No. They're stupid.

Whoops, looks like I broke him

At the time, "well regulated" meant "well equipped". And a militia is made up of regular citizens who are called up to take arms against an invader, like the minutemen. There's nothing about a militia that implies they have any sort of formal training.

But don't take my word for it. Read the federalist papers, they were written by the same folks as the bill of rights and go into great detail about what they intended.

The Constitution was supposed to be a living document, to evolve over time. There's no justification for trying to not only roll back modern gains, but then freeze the law at the founding forever into the future.

That's why there's a process for changing it built right in. That process does not include the judiciary taking on the role of the legislative branch.

how is interpretation of the law fascist?

You're not suggesting interpretation of the law. You're suggesting reinterpretation of the law. Changing it without changing it, implying that the actual words mean nothing, or whatever a judge decides they mean this week.

Fascists are largely unconcerned with the law, and if they are, it's in the service of power, not modernism

Fascists love the law, it's one of their most powerful weapons. Luckily for them, they're never targeted by it, they simply interpret it in a way that it can be used against their enemies.

Do you really want courts reinterpreting established law on a whim for the sake of "modernism"? That sounds fashy to me, really stupid easy to abuse. If you don't like the Constitution, change it. It has instructions on how to do that.

Red Lobster is a huge chain...

allowing them to hoover up our data

Hate to break it to you, but the fediverse is public. Most instances don't even require an account for read-only access. If Facebook wants your data they don't need to federate to get it.

So you're strawmanning me, basically. I said they created a market. I said that because it's true. I never said a damn thing about how they created the market, in fact I went to great lengths to point out that all of these devices existed before apple created theirs. You're so desperate to rant about fanboys that you inserted opinions into my post that weren't there.

Here's the deal, bro. Fanboys and haters are equally annoying. I can't imagine how empty your life must be to have such strong opinions about a fucking phone.

What bubble? The iPod was an enormous cultural phenomenom that brought mp3 players into the mainstream. Nobody's ever heard of the saehan mpman, even though it predated the iPod for years, because it was bought by a few thousand early adopters and made no impact at all.

This guy hates apple so much he's trying to convince me they're not financially successful lmao

I'm in favor of this, because fuck trump, but I give it 1 election cycle until this process is abused and weaponized. I don't think this precedent will change things for the better.