Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)TE
Posts
1
Comments
391
Joined
2 yr. ago

  • You're gonna get mocked for saying compiler instead of interpreter, since python isn't compiled.

    But, to answer the spirit of your question, I've had good experiences with "Pydroid 3." Clean interface and gets the job done.

  • My phone (Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra) will only partially pair with my car's (2018 Camery) Bluetooth.

    It pairs for media just fine, so I can listen to music and podcasts no problem, but it refuses to sync phone calls and texts. It just goes into a loop of pairing/connected/disconnected/pairing.

    I've reset the phone and cleared the cache on both ends.

    It's something I've been meaning to do a deeper dive into for literal years at this point and just haven't. Need to check other devices to see if it's specific to my phone, and I should see if I can't do some monitoring on the Bluetooth comms directly. It's just low enough priority that I haven't gotten around to it.

  • I just looked it up, and Linnell also did "Let's Get This Over With," which is by far my favorite of their more recent stuff...

    Yeah, I think I've just gotta disagree with you as well. "Dr Worm" is such a banger too...

    Yeah, it's tough, cause I love pretty much all the Flansburgh you listed, but I think Linnell probably edges it out for me...

    Yeah, I keep looking up other songs to try and make the case for Flansburgh, and they keep being Linnell. He also did "Contrecoup." And it looks like he's primary on "Older." I think all the songs that are immediately popping to mind are Linnell, so I guess that says something...

  • But she didn't hire him on her own dime. She used her position as DA to have the DA's office hire him to try the case.

    You are absolutely not allowed to hire from a pool of people you know on the government's dime. If the Department of Energy puts out a contract to build a power plant, the guy in charge of who gets hired has to disclose any conflict of interest, and is 1000% not allowed to award that work to a friend without oversight.

    And if they did, and that friend then started giving them expensive gifts, that's a huge huge no no.

    And while you're right that she does claim that they split the cost of the vacations, she claims that she reimbursed him for her half in cash, and has no receipts to that affect. Which could very well be true, but you must admit looks terrible.

  • It isn't that it affects the trial per se, but it looks like corruption, right?

    I use my government position to hire my private practice lover for a high profile case, and then they treat me to several expensive vacations?

    It's not that it points to something fishy with the case directly, but when the DA is involved in obvious corruption, I can see bringing it up if your only defense is "this trial is part of a corrupt bid to keep me off the ballot."

    It's not, but holy cow does it add fuel to that fire if you are in fact engaged in obvious corruption elsewhere.

  • He's not saying it was pushing prices. He was saying it was potentially a big driver of the OP headline.

    Yes, prices are going up, but a potential big factor in the increase of spending on food could be associated delivery costs.

    They are likely considered part of "money spent on food" as calculated by the study, and have been a much more prevalent thing since the pandemic.

  • What clear rule did she violate though? Like, Grammerly isn't an AI tool. It's a glorified spell check. And several of her previous professors had recommended it's use.

    What she did "wrong" was write something that TurnItIn decided to flag as AI generated, which it's incredibly far from 100% accurate at.

    Like, what should she have done differently?

  • Corn rows aren't inherently wrong. Tons of people have short corn rows.

    And while I see your point, I think it hinges on the wording of the CROWN Act.

    If the rule doesn't target a hair style or type, and is applied even handedly across all hair styles and types, I think it's probably okay?

    Like, there are plenty of men's hairstyles that are more "white coded" that would certainly also be disallowed under the current rules.

    I'd be curious what the actual rule was from the school as well. I know the school I went to growing up, it had to be above the bottom of your ear lobe.

    Dumb, but not inherently racial I think?

  • You are technically correct. The best kind of correct. :)

    I was using "The War in Iraq" as a cover term for the whole ongoing conflict that arose in the aftermath of 9/11.

    I think that your point actually furthers my parallel though. As the US was in Afghanistan, the Bush Administration's obsession with Iraq ended up with them pushing questionable Intel that there were Al Queda controlled WMDs in Iraq, and that we had to invade there as well if we really wanted to win the war.

    There's a pretty clear parallel between that logic and the "Hamas Tunnels" arguments we're hearing out of Israel at the moment.