tehmics @ tehmics @lemmy.world

Posts

1

Comments

298

Joined

2 yr. ago

Because it's just the outer layer, and the print is still there. Your new outer skin is just the old under layer.

If you damage your skin enough to remove the fingerprint, it doesn't grow back. There are lots of people without fingerprints due to the types of work they do

Could also be rare in an algorithmic sense. If someone randomly uploads it to YouTube in 2007, only gets 12 views and it just sits there unwatched for years

Ah, well I agree that definitely looks unenforceable to me

I don't think I have a preference on the touchpads honestly but I vastly prefer the steam deck controls overall. Been hoping for a standalone steam controller 2 ever since it came out

Did you respond to the wrong person or something?

I'd bet they're steam controller touch pads, and they're quite a bit bigger than the final steam deck ones. Probably normal sized sticks too, with that in mind. The sizes are relatively identical to my steam controller

They're cheaper which is insane. We could see a boom if third party manufacturers hop on steamOS now

You answered your own question 5 times over go with the deck

Another shill take from the rat, what a surprise

Sure. That still doesn't answer my question though, what happens?

So this bowl is meant to be used with oem plastic sticks? Is there a steel stick on the market anymore?

What actually happens if you try to boot this? Stuck at SEGA splash screen? Error code?

The early days with roku channels like rev3 were great. They took a while to go down hill

I agree he wasn't acting in good faith, but I'm more concerned with any would-be censorship than a silly troll. The moderator actually reached out to me and explained the scenario, and pointed out that they actually left one of their duplicate posts up.

I'm pretty happy with how the particular situation has gone down, but I do still stand by my initial comments and my principles on censorship.

Mods handled it appropriately and sealion is an idiot, misrepresenting the scenario. but that was a given.

Thanks for taking the time to break it down.

I agree that he isn't acting in good faith, but silencing the discussion is (would be) the bigger issue to me than some silly troll.

I really appreciate your response and reasoning. I don't have an issue with logistical moderation (e.g. duplicate threads) but I'm extremely adverse to moderation of actual topics for what should be obvious reasons.

Given that you left the other thread up, I think I can put away the pitchfork for now. I'll have a look at your rules, and hopefully find myself satisfied and participating in your community.

You're going to lose what appears to be your only defender if you maintain that bullshit rhetoric.

Don't care. I don't care about your sealioning either.

It is my view that some things should be dealt with through downvotes and discussion, not moderation. Especially when we are talking about authoritarianism of all fucking things.

Moderation in my view is an extreme measure that shouldn't be enacted lightly. And I only want to participate in communities that share that view.

Yes. I disagree with their rules and their enforcement of them, and this exposed that. So I wont participate in it.

What else would you have me do in that scenario?

It's not like I pour over each community's rules before reading any content that surfaces from them.

Yep, that's part of my point.

I've already blocked the community over this. Know any alternatives?

We used to say the same thing about the internet as a whole, and then the big tech companies crowded out all the smaller options, started controlling narratives and we ended up where we are at now.

I don't want to see the same thing happen with Lemmy instances. We are on the ground floor.