I hear you, and those things seem nice at a glance, but I don't agree with your sense of guarantee. We're seeing an upending of things that "usually" happen, or that "definitely can" happen, especially with "self-managed" entities such as the SCOTUS. Have you seen judges actually get held accountable recently, even locally?
This is a strange response for me because de-federating is an active step on behalf of its admin, usually after a vote amongst its users, at creating a virtual boundary between the two entities. How is that burying your head in the sand? And yeah, lemmy.world is big, but aside from the obvious loss of content/users, what other effect will that have on the mass of de-federated instances?
Never resign! What honourable player would deprive their foe of a well-earned mate? What of endgame practice?! Playing from a losing position is good for you.
I didn't realize until now, but I've been very fortunate to be able to take the bus to work recently, and the lack of fear of other vehicles on the road is probably a huge contributor to how much better I feel after the commute. I have that anxiety ever-present in the back of my mind while driving a sedan.
That guy has the BEST impersonation I've ever seen, it's repulsive! Not just the voice, but the hands, the sucking air through the teeth, the head tilts and mouth movements, all spot-on. You know how you have to wonder about the mental state of horror game/movie artists looking at reference material all day? Same feeling about Shane Gillis.
The New York statue, in Union Square, was removed early that afternoon; the New York City Parks Department made a statement that it "stands firmly against any unpermitted erection in city parks, no matter how small".
To clarify a point I don't think the people replying have specifically pointed out enough already: this line of thinking is contrary to a representative democracy. If some people aren't worthy of voting, then they aren't worthy of being represented by their government (e.g. slaves, felons, children). That's the main disagreement I have with that idea.
If you truly believe there's a measurable line for intelligence/competence below which people shouldn't vote, are you worried there are so many people in that group that it would affect the outcome? If that's true, then don't they deserve representation? This problem is solved if everyone votes. Shouldn't we just try to educate people instead of creating another marginalized group?
Gonna add an unsolicited recommendation here. One of the main things I held onto Amazon for was wishlisting for holidays. I've since migrated to giftopedia and I like it, so if you are me, give that a try.
There's a fundamental misunderstanding; the original commenter didn't mean to use the line-style "queue" meaning, they were using it by mistake and even admitted that in a follow-on comment. They meant "cue" by its distinct definition, not the one that overlapped with "queue" long ago. It wasn't a spelling correction -- it was a homophone correction. It wasn't a suggestion to queue up some Mitch Hedberg on yt, it was a cue for him to enter because one of his trademark jokes is about escalators.
It's strange because it... isn't really a joke, just wrong information? It's not a high enough value to be obvious hyperbole ("I saved like a million on groceries"), so it looks like a typo that you didn't realize you made and are now aggressively defending like you meant it as a joke. Not saying that's the case, but that's sure what it looks like.
Could you estimate how much it actually might have saved you? I think that'd be very good for the discussion.
I hear you, and those things seem nice at a glance, but I don't agree with your sense of guarantee. We're seeing an upending of things that "usually" happen, or that "definitely can" happen, especially with "self-managed" entities such as the SCOTUS. Have you seen judges actually get held accountable recently, even locally?