technocrit @ technocrit @lemmy.dbzer0.com

Posts

310

Comments

4,490

Joined

1 yr. ago

Oh yeah thanks. I was kinda thinking that. I should have tried before posting. Hopefully it helps another person.

They're all just fash to me.

Yeah, you're seriously supporting genocide and fascism.

Every vote matters.

LOL grow up. Straight up false info. Phony libs are never going to understand why they lose.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Civil_religion

Yeah, this is great example of how the liberalism supports fascism. They have literally nothing to offer except for attacking those who actually resist fascism.

What are you doing tho? Still crying about your loser election. Less than worthless.

most leftists in the wild will be for gun control.

Any actual evidence of this? Liberals are not leftists.

Fash recognize fash.

I don't think that person cares about women or anything else. They just said that they don't even want to hear about it.

... And so we should call machines "intelligent"? That's not how science works.

Their argument is that we don't understand human intelligence so we should call computers intelligent.

That's not hitting any nail on the head.

In fact, simple computer programs do a great job of solving these puzzles...

Yes, this shit is very basic. Not at all "intelligent."

why is it assumed that this isn’t what human reasoning consists of?

Because science doesn't work work like that. Nobody should assume wild hypotheses without any evidence whatsoever.

Isn’t all our reasoning ultimately a form of pattern memorization? I sure feel like it is.

You should get a job in "AI". smh.

Performance collapses because luck runs out. Bigger destruction of the planet won't fix that.

The paper doesn’t say LLMs can’t reason

Authors gotta get paid. This article is full of pseudo-scientific jargon.

5 years from now? Or was it supposed to be 5 years ago?

Pretty sure we already have skynet.

• https://www.nytimes.com/2025/04/25/technology/israel-gaza-ai.html
• https://www.nytimes.com/2025/05/30/technology/trump-palantir-data-americans.html

This is why I say these articles are so similar to how right wing media covers issues about immigrants.

Maybe the actual problem is people who equate computer programs with people.

Then when they pass laws, we’re all primed to accept them removing whatever it is that advantageous them and disadvantageous us.

You mean laws like this? jfc.

https://www.inc.com/sam-blum/trumps-budget-would-ban-states-from-regulating-ai-for-10-years-why-that-could-be-a-problem-for-everyday-americans/91198975

Who is "you"?

Just because some dummies supposedly think that NPCs are "AI", that doesn't make it so. I don't consider checkers to be a litmus test for "intelligence".

I'm going to write a program to play tic-tac-toe. If y'all don't think it's "AI", then you're just haters. Nothing will ever be good enough for y'all. You want scientific evidence of intelligence?!?! I can't even define intelligence so take that! \s

Seriously tho. This person is arguing that a checkers program is "AI". It kinda demonstrates the loooong history of this grift.

Computers are awesome at "recognizing patterns" as long as the pattern is a statistical average of some possibly worthless data set. And it really helps if the computer is setup to ahead of time to recognize pre-determined patterns.