Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)TE
Posts
4
Comments
1,701
Joined
2 yr. ago

  • The more accurate way to say that is, "open source" has a very clear meaning to a very specific set of people who agree with OSI's definition. But language evolves, they don't have a copyright on the term, more people have heard the term "open source" than have heard about the OSI, so "open source" means whatever most people believe it to mean.

    Velcro can be upset when people call competitors' hook-and-loop technology Velcro, but the rest of the world don't even know they exist.

    And philosophically, I think it's time OSI updates their definition to fit the times. As stated above, I think the guarantee of unfettered commercialization is antithetical to FOSS goals. And again, I'd be glad to be convinced otherwise.

  • I don't see anything wrong with limiting the commercialization of your code. I don't agree that limiting someone from monetizing your code in a way you disagree with precludes them from "doing useful things" with a fork. Equating usefulness with commercialization seems implicitly capitalist and antithetical to FOSS. CMV.

  • Gotcha.

    Yeah, it sounds like it's not "open source" according to a specific definition set by the OSI. But the term "open source" has grown beyond what they believe it to mean, and the FUTO license seems more than reasonable to me.

    I think the freedom to commercialize worked in the past, but we now live in a time of weaponized commercialization, especially in the mobile world. It seems reasonable to me for them to want to ensure their code is not commercialized in ways that are antithetical to the purpose of the project.

  • "Completely" made up is a bit hyperbole. They're not random, they are usually in some way indicative of the number of upvotes/downvotes a post is getting.

    The reality is that any naive upvote system can be gamed. The more popular Lemmy gets, the more lucrative it will be to systematically manipulate which posts/comments are promoted and which get buried. And a naive voting system that just reflects the raw number of up/down votes is trivial to manipulate. It's harder than a signal in the noise issue, it's more of a signal in a deliberately crafted manipulated signal issue.

    If Lemmy gets more popular, it's only a matter of time before it's forced to come up with alternative methods for deriving post sentiment.

  • "Runs like shit" is expected when you're relying on paging to system memory every frame, step 1 is to avoid a crash from oom/failed alloc.

    The next step is to reduce paging if possible. I see C:S2 has a min spec of a 4GB GPU. Assuming they actually tuned their game for such a card on windows, the unfortunate reality of proton/DXVK is that there's a bit of a memory overhead and lack of knowledge about residency priority, especially when translating a dx11 game.

    DX12 maps to Vulkan more closely, so my hope is that the -force-d3d12 flag would give DXVK better info to work with (ex. hopefully the game makes use of dx12 heaps and placed resources, which are 1:1 with vulkan concepts, and dxvk can make use of that to better ensure the most important resources don't get paged out).

  • Assuming C:S2 uses DX and you're running it through proton/dxvk, it's ultimately the Vulkan driver's job to page to system memory correctly. This honestly sounds like you're seeing a bug. In that circumstance, it shouldn't crash, it should just hurt performance from all the paging. I see a couple of older issues where people were seeing exactly this kind of issue with DXVK+Nvidia.

    • This old Witcher 3 one where they blamed it on Nvidia's memory allocator not playing well with linux THP (transparent huge pages). Disabling THP was a workaround.
    • This other issue for several titles that were hitting memory alloc failures despite having tons of system memory, just as you describe. They try several workarounds, but ultimately they believe it was fixed by a driver update.

    One other thing to try is, idk if you're running the game in dx11 or dx12 mode, but apparently both exist. If it's currently running in dx11 mode, try the launch flag -force-d3d12. If you're already using dx12, maybe try swapping back to dx11. Good luck!

  • Shared GPU memory (as described in that article) is just how Windows decided to solve the problem of oversubscription of VRAM. Linux solves it differently (looks like it just allocates what it needs in demand and uses GART to address it, but I would like to know more).

    So I'm curious what you mean when you say you miss it. Are you having programs crash OOM when running on Linux? Because that shouldn't be happening.

    It's not ideal to be relying on shared gpu mem anyway (at least in a dgpu scenario). Kinda like saying you have a preference on which crutches to use.

  • he's big into the clickbait game

    Don't hate the player, hate the game.

    Smarter Every Day did a video on using clickbait titles and thumbnails. The data is clear: everyone complains about it, but it performs far better than anything else on YT. And if the goal is to most efficiently spread educational videos to the largest number of people, then unfortunately, it's really the only option.

    TBH, the tone isn't that different from Bill Nye. Wacky colors, loud obnoxious personality, gotta get kids excited about science somehow.

  • nominated to be a commissioner in 2011 by President Barack Obama, who followed tradition in preserving balance on the commission by accepting the recommendation of Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell.

    That explains it...

  • That is a better analogy, but critically, phone lines are regulated as Title II common carrier utilities, but internet connections are not.

    Given how Trump's previous FCC pick, Ajit Pai, killed net neutrality, I expect Trump's new pick, and his SCOTUS to pick whatever benefits Comcast the most.

    Not blaming the ISP would give the net neutrality case too much credence. I think Comcast would rather be "required" to do deep packet inspection on all their users to look for "illegal behavior" (among other things).

  • Because the DNC is not blameless, and while we can't control Trump or his followers, the DNC is something we (should) have control over. Being critical of the things we have control over is literally the only way to improve them.

    And for the record, DNC != Democrats. The person you are responding to is being critical of the DNC, not democrats. That is a very important distinction.

    Also did you just link to the wiki article on FUD as though people might not know what you're referring to?