Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)TA
Posts
10
Comments
302
Joined
5 mo. ago

  • But they can use some other instance. With centralized platforms the issue is that they want to do business everywhere. Russia threatened to arrest Google employees in Moscow, for instance. Even without such threats, they want to have access to local markets. That isn't a concern for some instance in Ireland that is supported by donations.

  • As a general rule, where quality of output is important, AI is mostly useless.

    Your experience with AI clearly doesn't go beyond basic conversations. This is unfortunate because you're arguing about things you have virtually no knowledge of. You don't know how to use AI to your own benefit, nor do you understand how others use it. All this information is just a few clicks away as professionals in many fields use AI today, and you can find many public talks and lectures on YouTube where they describe their experiences. But you must hate it simply because it's trendy in some circles.

  • This post technically doesn’t go against out rules, aside from not having a question mark

    So it does go against the rules and we know it's likely a lie. There is no reason to keep it.

  • It's a common dictionary, which is probably not very good in this context. I think it would be more appropriate to refer to ISTQB, as it is likely the most relevant source when it comes to software testing and failures:

    Human beings make errors (mistakes), which produce defects (faults, bugs), which in turn may result in failures. Humans make errors for various reasons, such as time pressure, complexity of work products, processes, infrastructure or interactions, or simply because they are tired or lack adequate training

    Or to put it simple:

    We're seeing a failure here.