t3rmit3 @ t3rmit3 @beehaw.org

He / They

---

Read more

Posts

39

Comments

2,020

Joined

2 yr. ago

When the political establishment and capitalist class has already decided, but they need to keep up the charade that the public is the decider.

I found out my brother has been a Trumper since 2016, and keeps it secret from his friends, who he knows would not be okay with it. Not so much "shy", as "knows he's an asshole, but literally only cares about religion". He's just a misogynist, is the reality.

or the outrage over the non-endorsements is contrived, irrational, and/or self-important; an embarrassing freak-out

I think it's more that most 'normies' never actually thought we'd get here (this close to an open autocracy), and this is the clearest indicator to most of them that autocracy is rapidly arriving, and now they're freaking out. Obv the capitalist class was always going to align with an autocrat rather than risk their wealth, and never should have been allowed to run newspapers, but here we are.

I think you and CrimeDad are kind of talking past each other.

Since they’re now showing signs of obedience to Trump in fear of being punished, important scholars are pointing out that it’s a huge problem with a long history in the collapse of democracies into autocracies.

I think this is simply the intrinsic interplay of the capitalist class and autocrats, though. They (millionaires, billionaires, etc) will, as a group, always protect themselves first when an autocrat comes along.

You are looking at the situation and saying, "Well, them kowtowing is clearly evidence that an autocrat has come along, because when it's not an autocrat they don't kowtow", and CrimeDad is looking at it and saying, "Yes, but they're just the indicator, they should never have been expected to try to stop this. They just intrinsically will align themselves with autocrats in order to maintain their positions of power, but despite that we've allowed them to take control of a core protection of our democracy (press freedom)".

Go fashy, get bashy

It depends on the protestors. White protesters? The establishment will combat them with police, but generally the French people will be on their side. Non-white protestors? Definitely demonized.

We're a security engineering group (other 2 teams are Compliance and SOC), so we do security automation, vuln mgmt, binary/ malware analysis, web app testing, SIEM management, level 2+ IR, etc. Basically anything that requires using a shell, or scripting. Right now I'm doing prep for a FedRAMP ATO attempt, so lots of image build pipeline work, prepping for ConMon reporting, etc.

Definitely interested in hearing what y'all are about (and I am in the US).

That's awesome, thank you for that!

The short form ones go on insta and tiktok.

It's important to distinguish between why a company offers a service, and what people use the service for. TikTok gets used for lots of content that doesn't go viral, and that doesn't try to chase the algorithm.

You heard them, you're in charge of video hosting now.

There is no such thing as a form of media that is only applicable to a specific scale of use. Long form and short form media is useful to large and small groups.

For example, my partner coaches high school policy debate, which has long form video training content, short form content (30 seconds - 5 minutes) like clips from tournament rounds or practices, for recruitment, and very short form (1 - 30 second) clips that are mostly memes.

Their shorter form content is explicitly meant not to be viral, it's purely for their school, and other kids in their debate league. Most of it's not even parsable by non-debaters. It's only useful to their small community, but that's what they want.

I actually kind of love the idea of a per diem Unknown User Limit. Like the first 5000 unregistered users can view the site, but after that they get dropped at ingress. Also, limit user signups per day (this ain't about growing user base, it's about preventing virality)!

Sure, you could still need an ingress server that can handle a high load to avoid the accidental ddos if word-of-mouth gets out about it, but that's a million times lower of a requirement than a server that can handle serving a web page or app to the same number of users.

Now that the week is behind me, I have assessed that it's time to start looking for a new job. My team lost our CISO in February, and mgmt placed us under the Operations director, and they do not know what they're doing, and don't have our backs. The whole team is burning out rapidly, and I don't think it's long before most of us start moving on.

That aside 🫠 I had a nice Saturday taking a long walk and getting hot pot with my partner!

Congratulations, Audrey!

Yes, but some states provide that coverage on top of FMLA, e.g. California providing up to 52 weeks paid for injury recovery (DI), and 8 weeks for child care/ bonding (PFL).

Even if 8 weeks isn't much, it's 4 times what they were being offered, so certainly worth checking for their state.

Yes, anti-capitalist theory does need to move beyond Marxism, but it doesn't need to move to (as Joseph Heath seems to believe) Rawlsian liberal-egalitarianism.

Perhaps this is the Mutualist in me chafing at Rawlsianism in general, but his emphasis on "Liberal vs Decent (vs Other) Peoples", and his envisaged world order that can both "tolerate" other societies who disregard certain human rights, but also choose to intervene (as a structural component of the philosophy) into societies which they deem not "tolerable", just feels like reinventing the "Rules-Based Liberal Order" of Western Liberal Militarism with a moral (self-)justification, rather than a monetary one. Same tune, new instrument. His focus on Hierarchy is anathema to his supposed desire to produce equity or equality; equality is the absence of hierarchy, which obviously can't be enforced at a micro-level, but he's gone the dead opposite direction, and somehow come to the conclusion that equality can be forcibly imposed (by someone with an unequal amount of power, of course).

Heath linked to a piece by Freddie deBoer on the inability of Western (Neo)Liberalism to create the outcomes it desires, and frankly I find that piece far more persuasive than Rawls' insistence that you can maintain a massive, national and international-level hierarchy but actually everyone will do what's "Right". Any sufficiently large or permanent hierarchy will first and foremost seek to sustain itself, no matter who or what is in charge of it, and there's no inherent way to prevent a system from doing or becoming bad. Systems and structures and even societies themselves are merely organizational tools, and no tool can prevent itself from being misused.

It makes me even more nervous when that large-scale, International "Order" is turned into a moral imperative, as it is in Rawlsianism. Now you're just reinventing the Holy Roman Empire, with some council of supposed representative citizens in lieu of a Pope, but still operating under the auspices of being the ultimate arbiter of morality.

The solution to inequality isn't creating some unassailably-powerful liberal-egalitarian super-entity, to enforce worldwide human rights, it's to dismantle structures of control that perpetuate systemic inequality.

you’re failing to see the biases inherent to the content you’re consuming

You are underestimating people, I think. People choose their echo chambers because they understand that their positions are being challenged elsewhere. It's not an inability to see the bias in what they consume, it's a dislike of the alternative.

Every Trumper I talk to knows very well that Trump is unpopular, that Christian Nationalism is unpopular, that abortion rights are popular, etc, but they don't care, and they don't want to constantly be (rightfully) told and shown how dumb they are, so they wall themselves off in their gardens. "I'm just tired of hearing how bad Trump is all the time."

Heartening news. Even if the alt-right manosphere is hoovering up more young men, if their message isn't invigorating them to vote it limits the 'blast radius' pretty significantly.

Media literacy was never the problem, because it wasn't actual confusion about what was real or not that was drawing people to the extreme alt-right sphere, it was confirmation bias that allowed people to choose not to critically assess the content for veracity.

But I don't think you can solve this through "media ecology" either. Curating this volume of content is impossible, and there are legitimate dangers in giving the government too much ability to shut down free speech (see Germany condemning any form of pro-Palestinian rhetoric as antisemitic) in order to guard "truth".

I think that this is similar to the issue of biased GenAI; you can't fix bias at the human-output side, you have to build a society that doesn't want to engage with bigotry, and explore and question its own assumptions (and that's not ever a fixed state, it's an ongoing process).

I actually like this.

This is not a gimmick of handing out "random" checks (which, we now know, all went to people who had already voted Republican), this affects all members equally, as a statement of values.

You can write in "abstain", or leave blank, whatever you want if you don't want to endorse any particular candidate, but democracy is important, and this might help push people to overcome the inconveniences that are often used to discourage people from voting.