sylver_dragon @ sylver_dragon @lemmy.world

Posts

4

Comments

951

Joined

2 yr. ago

Crypto is a ponzi scheme playacting at being a currency or investment vehicle. Meme coins just dispense with playacting and aim for shorter time horizons on cashing out from the ponzi scheme.

Um yay, I guess. I'm always for more options. And maybe there is a market out there for the "game from the cloud" idea. Personally though, I'd rather just play a game on the Steam Deck directly. Or, if that's somehow not an option, stream the game from my own PC to my TV via SteamLink. In no world do I want to pay for a subscription to play games on a device where I can just play that game locally.

My personal preference is to use FOSS whenever it's practical. For home use, I've switched to FOSS for the vast majority of my computing needs. I run Linux on both my server and desktop. Most of the software on my server is FOSS, with the one exception being a container using the Splunk free license. My desktop is running Linux, and I use LibreOffice for documents and the like. I do run Visual Studio Code, which is technically Open Source, though I would not put it past Microsoft to do a rug-pull on that eventually. And I have an extensive library of games with Steam, basically nothing of which is Open Source.

I have reached a point, financially, that piracy is not morally defensible. And I'm not willing to get into the mire of if, or where such a line would be. I believe that creators should be rewarded for their work. Though, I also agree that the limits on copyright are way out of whack with the changes Disney has purchased through the years. So, piracy as a moral question is a murky subject, with no clear answers to me. But, the end result is that I buy games, movies or TV shows. For other software, I usually look to FOSS projects (e.g. Gimp vs Photoshop, FreeCAD/OpenSCAD vs Autodesk), free licenses (e.g. Splunk) or just do without. For TV Shows/Movies, if it's not on one of the streaming services I subscribe to, I may buy it via a digital service; or, I do without.

Companies taking advantage of Linux to create locked down, proprietary systems is pretty common. For example, Android is Linux. Many smart TVs run some flavor of Linux. E.g. Tizen from Samsung is Linux based. If a company can short cut the software development process and licensing costs by using Linux, that's often a first choice. So, my bet would be on Wall-E running on a version of Linux.

The dystopian part would be that the company locked it's drivers behind a closed source model, and only included highly obscured binaries on Wall-E's OS. Motors and controllers would be non-standard, requiring closed source firmware and the hardware would refuse to work with any software which isn't signed by an original manufacturer's digital certificate. Using an unsigned binary would blow a fuse in Wall-E's CPU, killing him.

it’s steam game which means there’s a key?

Maybe.
If the game is already in your Steam account, no. I can't seem to run the actual policy down with a quick search, but games in your Steam library are not transferable.
If you have received a key in your email (It'll be a long, alphanumeric sequence) then you can forward that to someone else, so long as it hasn't been used by you or anyone else.
If the game was sent as a gift to your Steam account using the Steam gift system. Then no, you cannot transfer it.

I would look into three things first:

1. Do the terms of the prize dictate transferability? In the rules of the contest in which you won the game, was there anything about not selling or giving away the prize?
2. What type of game is it? Video game, board game, card game?
3. What is the delivery mechanism for the game? Some things will be easier to transfer than others. A physical copy can likely just be shipped to a new recipient. A digital key for a game might be easy to just send to the recipient. Other delivery mechanisms may or may not have a system to prevent transfer.

Never mind recent motherboards, I’m still salty about the era of boards from 2004-2010 or so which had USB ports but the BIOS would refuse to accept inputs from them until after POST so you’d have to dredge up a separate PS/2 keyboard and jack it in to be able to configure the damn thing or use the boot menu.

Had one of these in a server rack. Which was all kinds of fun because the rack KVM was USB. We ultimately just left the PS/2 keyboard plugged in and sitting on top of the server in the rack. Given the shitshow which was cable management in those racks (we shared them with several departments), that keyboard was hardly the worst sin.

The American version would require a modified F350HD with a fork lift to get the Pope lifted into the back.

And rigged to roll coal incense.

While an interesting idea, this sounds like an organization designed to separate some doofus investment manager with a lot of capital before inevitably folding because companies won't give a damn. Sure, if we were to pass laws allowing us to hunt down anyone responsible for using blue LEDs on devices which did not specifically need blue light, and burn their eyes out with a hot poker. Then, such a certification might make sense. But, so long as there are no repercussions for companies making horrible design decisions, why would any company pay for a certification like this.

Geometry is a lot of it. It also makes seeing much easier when pulling out. When backing in, I can easily see the traffic lane around me, and they can see me pretty easy as well (I'm the asshole blocking up the whole place). When driving out, only a smaller portion of my vehicle needs to enter the traffic lane before I have a clear view of any opposing traffic. For the case of nosing it, I have a clear view while pulling in; but, when pulling out I need to get most of my vehicle out into the traffic lane, before I can see anything.

No, if you open a terminal and run:
sudo dmesg

You should get a long output which is the kernel log. Assuming the crash happened recently, there may be something in the last few lines (bottom of the output) which could indicate why the process died (or was killed). Keep in mind that this is a running log; so, if it's been a while since the crash, the entries for it may be higher up in the log. It's often best (if you can) to trigger the problem then immediately go run the sudo dmesg command and look at the output. With luck, there will be useful logs. If not, you may need to look elsewhere.

On my system (Arch), if I have too much running, the kernel can kill processes based on resource starvation. It's quite possible you're running into a similar limitation. There should be a message in dmesg when this happens.

Ya, I really like NextCloud and have been using it for quite a few years now. But, like many such solutions for getting your data off other people's computers: it means you have to do a lot of work. I have a server running in my home and have to maintain all of the software on it myself. I also have a small Splunk instance setup which I use for log collection and analysis and check the dashboards at least once a day to watch for possible compromise. It's certainly more work for me than just using Google's cloud. But, it also means my data isn't compromised by default.

As many angels as actually exist.

NextCloud - Stop storing your data on someone else's computer. Works well to allow syncing KeePass databases between devices.

So, who's got the inside track on which company is paying the largest bribe for the contract? If tax dollars are going to be diverted to line Trump's pockets, we might as well catch some of that money by riding the stock bump when the contract is announced. Maybe get some puts on the stock if we manage to elect a less corrupt President in four years.

The person who authored the cheat(s) the other person is using. Because clearly, if I lost they must be cheating. /s

For many games, I'd argue that you are to blame for your loss. Assuming the game is based purely on skill, then your ability to execute said skills is the only factor which matters. Consider something like Chess, where the game is solved and one's ability to win is really down to your ability to memorize board positions and recognize the optimal move. If you lose, it's likely because you failed to pick the optimal path.

This is mitigated, to a greater or lesser extent in games where chance plays some role. It's entirely possible to chose an optimal path, but have RNGesus decide that you get to lose today. Some games provide some ability to manage the risks created by randomness, but you often have some reliance on "luck". Obviously, the more luck dependent a game is, the less control you have over winning/losing.

And then there is the issue of other players who can affect the outcome. If you play a game where there are more than two players, the other players may be able to change the course of the game enough that, no matter how well optimized your choices, you cannot win. This leads to the classic "kingmaker" problem in board games. It may be that someone who is themselves unable to win is in a position to directly effect the outcome of the game in such a way as to make another player win or lose. So, maybe you played a very good game, but the kingmaker decides that you lose.

Ultimately, the answer to the original question is, "it depends". And there are a lot of factors one must look at to come to an answer. And that answer is unlikely to be whole one thing or the other.

Not terribly surprising, Google would often direct me to StackOverflow threads as I was googling for an answer to a question. And as often as not, either the question was closed; or, instead of anyone providing an answer, the commenters would spiral off into questioning everything about the original question asker's life choices. While I do get the whole XY Problem, this sort of thing seemed to be over-used on SO.

Granted, I don't know if AI answers are any better. Sure, they can answer a lot of the simple questions, but I've not seen them be useful on hard, more obscure questions. Probably because those questions don't have ready answers on SO.

We learned this lesson over two decades ago. If you put your database server on the internet, you should lose your internet privileges. At minimum, the companies hit by this should consider the coin-mining done on their systems as a consulting fee from the hackers demonstrating how fucking stupid it was to set it up this way.

Docker is just going to be used to run the applications which host your website. What you need to decide first is what your website will be and that will inform the decision on what technologies will be used to host your website. For example, if you are thinking of something like a blog, you might choose WordPress as the main hosting platform. This will need some sort of database behind it, for which you might choose MySQL or Postgres. You would also need some sort of web server software, which you might choose Nginx or Apache. At a basic level, you could now have the entire web stack defined: E.g. WordPress, MySQL, Nginx.

Ok, so now you need to sort out where those technologies will run. The easy, older solution is to spin up a physical box and load all of the software packages on the native Operating System (OS) of that box. This works perfectly well, until it's time to start patching and updating the OS and software. And you will want to do those updates. This will probably go well for the first few upgrades, but eventually something will go sideways. Often this will be that several of your software packages will require different version of the same, underlying library. Or, something will just not install right and your website stops working. This is where docker comes in.

Docker lets you run each software package in it's own contained environment. Each application runs in it's own container, and the other containers are only reached via network calls. It's like having a separate virtual machine for each service (this is how we used to actually run stuff like this); but, without all the overhead of actually having multiple virtual machines. So, even if you upgrade package XYZ in the Nginx container to version 2.1, the MySQL container could have package XYZ still running at version 1.9. Neither container knows or cares about what is running in the other containers.

The other advantage of containers is that the base OS and software in the container is usually well defined and doesn't change much. The container will be able to reach permanent storage for any configuration and data files. But, if something goes wrong with the OS or software inside the container, then that container is destroyed and a new copy spun up and attached to the config/data storage. Software upgrades can also take advantage of this, as you can often stop the current container and start a container running the new version of the software, attach it to the config/data storage and maybe run some sort of "upgrade database" command. This makes for less mistakes and chances for things to not go well.

If your goal is to learn to self host, I would recommend putting those posts over in the !selfhosting@slrpnk.net. They are likely to get a better reception than in the programming and Linux communities you spammed with this post. Though, even there you may run into a bit of the RTFM! vibe you got here if you are posting questions without context and which appear to be low effort "I want to do something but have made no attempt to learn anything on my own". I'd recommend spending some time reading long form blogs/guides on web hosting and watching YouTube videos. Again, long form stuff. Skip the clik-bait-y crap with titles like "get your website running in 5 minutes!

<insert stupid emojis here>

Good luck.