𝕽𝖚𝖆𝖎𝖉𝖍𝖗𝖎𝖌𝖍 @ sxan @midwest.social

🅸 🅰🅼 🆃🅷🅴 🅻🅰🆆.

---

Read more

Posts

26

Comments

3,712

Joined

3 yr. ago

Yeah, especially for text files. Hard no.

Databases have their uses, but the trade off between obfuscating the data and making it harder for users to access has to be far more compelling. LogSeq is a really good example that you can do relatively complex note organization with cross references and tree structure without resorting to a database. Using a DB for something like this is user-hostile, smells of vendor lock-in, and seems lazy.

Home Assistant has so many moving parts, so I don't complain. I do wish containers would become first class citizens like the OS, because some stuff is just harder in containers. The only thing I can think of as to the "why" is because of how the OS project installs software, but that's an easily addressed problem so it must be something else.

Still, it's nice to know the container method is moving forward; I'm so done with installing specific OSes just to use some given piece of software.

I thought not, but just last week there was a discussion about someone asking about buying the "Pro" version of their distro, which have them access to... free open source software they could have just downloaded. Had a big (polite) argument with someone about the ethics of this

Distros (ZorinOS) are doing this crap. Shysters will always find a way to fleece people.

Now I'm wondering, if it were bundled with an OCI sandboxing system, that would address my issues with Flatpack and Snap. Technology has moved on and Flatpack has stagnated, and Snap's just an attempt to centralize control and distribution. It's time for a redesign, specifically focusing on supply chain attacks, with sandboxing all the way down.

I got one big one and the Lander the same Christmas; we weren't well-off, and that was an extravagant Christmas, the best I'd ever had, haul-wise.

It was the year before my parents divorced, and that probably had something to do with the largess.

Damn. That's them. Did you have one? Which part did you lose first? I think the missiles were the first to go; they may not have survived the holiday season. Then I lost the hand. I'm pretty sure mine had switchblade wings and maybe a switchblade sword, too, although I'm not sure about that.

I was 7 or 8, and not great at keeping track of small parts and these things disassembled quite a lot.

But what I really miss is that Eagle Lander. I'd pay good money to find one in good condition; they were the coolest things flying, at the time.

What a great photo! What did you use?

Portia are the best spiders, hunting the worst pests.

Nothing I had as a kid ran on batteries. It was all springs.

You think I'm doing the "riding dinosaurs" spiel, but I'm not that old. And, yes, there were things that had batteries, but not most kid toys. I had a 3' tall battle robot from some TV show, pre-transformers, that shot hard little plastic missiles from one fist, and the entire other fist could be spring-launched hard enough to bruise a younger sister's forehead. Not that I'd ever have done such a thing. I had an Eagle lander from Space 1999 with detachable cockpit, which also must have been 3 or 4' long. I had fucking lawn darts, perhaps the most incredible and incredibly dangerous weapon sold as a toy, which we would try to launch over the house into a yard we couldn't see, and compete for who could get their's stuck most deeply in the earth. When I was 6, I had a full-on pump-action BB gun capable of putting holes in thin plywood.

We didn't have a lot of batteries, but we also had almost no regulation in the toy industry, and it's honestly surprising to me today that so few of the neighborhood ended up in the hospital from just the toys.

It's a sad commentary on our times when a body can't even roast sausages in their own back yard, and they have to sneak out in the woods to do it. SMH

I like this idea, but with the increase in supply chain attacks, I'm reluctant to use it. I've been much more reticent about installing from AUR, and my use of github projects has drastically slowed down since I now feel as if I have to read all the source code for everything I get.

I've sandboxed programs before, and I may just start making that standard practice, but still... it makes me angry. It's, like: this is why we can't have nice things. There are precious few OSS supply chain static code analysis tools, and there are a lot of languages I don't know well enough to review, or which have such broad or deep dependency trees that it's more work than it's worth. The most frustrating is the dampening effect it's having on OSS. It only pushes people to only use programs from big commercial companies.

Anyway, none of that is directly related to your program, which is really cool. Sadly, if there aren't any positive developments in the OSS ecosystem for attacking the supply chain problem, cool projects like this are not going into my toolbox.

Why do you say that?

We got a glimpse of what a true exodus could look like, and I'm with you. As much as I'd love to see Reddit collapse from its own shittiness, for Lemmy's sake I'd rather see a trickle who have a chance to learn manners and leave their vitriol behind.

Not saying Lemmy's perfect. I'm not saying I'm perfect: I have bad days and make asshole responses, too. But they get swallowed, or I get a reasonable response and I apologize. In the main, the real, consistent excuses for human beings who resist the opportunity to become better people tend to join instances like Hexbear, and can be blocked en mass.

TBH what I saw first is that you connected a fan to some hard drives and called it a homelab.

It was pretty funny for the half second it lasted.

I liked the idea until you made it about sound.

I don't want some random kid biting me. I could get rabies.

Huh. I don't really hear any units of length anymore, now that I think about it. Even the doctor measures my height in inches, not feet+inches.

I honestly don't know. I don't hear "meters" used at all, but the first thing that comes to mind about "yards" is the 2000 movie The Whole Nine Yards.

US football still uses yards, doesn't it? I don't watch football either. But I just checked a random football stats website, and it still uses yards to measure pro football stats, so... yes, I guess. A lot of Americans still uses "yards."

Meter was easiest for me because it's essentially a yard (when eyeballing).

Liters are easy because the soft drink industry picked up on it decades ago as a way to get people to drink more soda. You'd buy cans and 6-packs, but nobody bought a gallon of soda. But they would, it turns out, buy a liter of soda, and as we got more obese as a nation, 2 liters. Liters of consumer drinks are really common, and so easy to visualize.

Rockets are: put a bunch of flammables in a giant tube and light it on fire. That's my understanding. Well, Ok. I know there are nozzles on gimbals, but... here's a joke that represents what I'm talking about:

A brain surgeon goes to a party, and the host is introducing him to people.
Host: "John, this is Jack. He's a software engineer."
John: "Oh, that's nice, but it isn't brain surgery."
Host: "This is Mary; she worked in industrial inorganic chemistry."
John: "Oh that's nice, but it isn't brain surgery."
Host (annoyed): "Maude, this is John. He's a brain surgeon."
Maude: "Oh, that's nice, but it isn't rocket science."

I think the big picture is deceptively simple. The practice of getting into orbit is far, far more complicated.

As for airplanes, yeah. I understand them well enough; I think with the right equipment and practice I could build something that flies. It's just, sometimes seeing a behemoth in the air it's just a bit astonishing, and unintuitive.

See‽ It's a glitch in the matrix. They added the feature, but failed to work it out in advance and coded themselves into a corner.

I think what happened is that they spent all the budget up front, really nailing stuff like Physics and Evolution, and then came to a crunch and Management said, "just throw something in there! We'll polish it later," only it's so self contradicting, they can't.

The idea is that blkdiscard will tell the SSD's own controller to zero out everything

Just to be clear, blkdiscard alone does not zero out anything; it just marks blocks as empty. --secure tells compatible drives to additionally wipe the blocks; -z actually zeros out the contents in the blocks like dd does. The difference is that - without the secure or z options - the data is still in the cells.

always encrypt all of your storage

Yes! Although, I don't think hindsight is helpful for OP.

Hm? Both bspwm and herbstluftwm have tabbed layouts. It's been so long since I've used i3, but it has them too, right? Sway's a mostly config-compatible, mostly client compatible i3 clone for Wayland, so I'd expect it to have tabs, too. As well as floating windows, which every tabbing WM I've used also supports.

I think I missed your point. What are you saying? Did I say something that made you think I thought tiling WMs could only do tiling?

What I'm opinionated about is configuration files. Technically, even a desktop could be configuration-less, although I've never seen one. I have become insistent that my WM have no configuration that isn't set through a client call. Sway still uses a config file like i3; mostly the same config file, unless it's drifted significantly. That was Sway's whole killer feature: i3 users could switch from X11 to Wayland with only minor configuration file changes.