sverit @ sverit @feddit.de

💻 M. Sc. in CS

---

Read more

Posts

10

Comments

139

Joined

2 yr. ago

I think it's only comparing the same impression of a fake apology, only to calm down the crowd.

https://knowyourmeme.com/memes/events/gamers-nexus-vs-linus-tech-tips-billet-labs-review-controversy

"I am truely sorry - for all the money I'm going to lose"

https://knowyourmeme.com/memes/events/gamers-nexus-vs-linus-tech-tips-billet-labs-review-controversy

You can use this link and force refresh at the bottom: https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1691693740254228741.html

(via https://feddit.de/comment/2218306 )

Some attention hungry incompetent wannabes?

Imaginary feeling of loss of control.

We know that we’re not perfect. We wear our imperfection on our sleeves in the interest of ensuring that we stay accountable to you. But it’s sad and unfortunate when this transparency gets warped into a bad thing.

Yeah, well, that’s one of the main issues addressed in this video: You are not transparent about this, when you swap out videos without notice or bury corrections in a non-pinned comment.

Listing the wrong amount of cache on a table for a CPU review is sloppy, but given that our conclusions are drawn based on our testing, not the spec sheet, it doesn’t materially change the recommendation.

If the listing is wrong, who guarantees the lab tests on which the conclusion is based on are not wrong?

The thoroughness that we managed on our last handful of GPU videos is getting really incredible given the limited time we have for these embargoes.

Take the time it needs to produce correct reviews then. Who wants fast but false results?

Edit: Follow up on Linus' response from GN: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X3byz3txpso

Followup on Linus' response from GN: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X3byz3txpso

Here is his response: https://linustechtips.com/topic/1526180-gamers-nexus-alleges-lmg-has-insufficient-ethics-and-integrity/page/16/?__cf_chl_rt_tk=riEm65zw7EleA5UJEi3eN8ZaHnVo6Smg27vxUlGW5uk-1692115262-0-gaNycGzNDGU#comment-16078641

My take on it:

We know that we’re not perfect. We wear our imperfection on our sleeves in the interest of ensuring that we stay accountable to you. But it’s sad and unfortunate when this transparency gets warped into a bad thing.

Yeah, well, that’s one of the main issues addressed in this video: You are not transparent about this, when you swap out videos without notice or bury corrections in a non-pinned comment.

Listing the wrong amount of cache on a table for a CPU review is sloppy, but given that our conclusions are drawn based on our testing, not the spec sheet, it doesn’t materially change the recommendation.

If the listing is wrong, who guarantees the lab tests on which the conclusion is based on are not wrong?

The thoroughness that we managed on our last handful of GPU videos is getting really incredible given the limited time we have for these embargoes.

Take the time it needs to produce correct reviews then. Who wants fast but false results?

Darkwood went a step further in 2017:

https://www.destructoid.com/darkwood-devs-put-the-full-game-on-the-pirate-bay-out-of-guilt/

Only until 2038-01-19

Blender ;)

By "Full-time" they have to mean 24/7, right?

Edit: Didn't think an explicit /s was necessary ;)

I'm actually ok with all of them.

Yeah, I would guess it's something like very long search terms concatenated with logic operators? These should be kind of database heavy? Or does indexeing make this easy?

!piracy@lemmy.dbzer0.com

Excuse me?! ISO 8601 >> *

Are DDoS protection services like those from Akamai, Arbor Networks, Link22 etc an option? Those are tested as ok by the German Federal Office for Information Security.