Skip Navigation

User banner
Posts
0
Comments
34
Joined
1 yr. ago

  • Yes, but in fairness: The same is true for iOS or GrapeneOS, though that's for valid reasons.

  • As much as I'd like to use a Linux phone, it's simply not feasible for almost everybody at the moment.

    What do people user their phone for?

    • Private conversations
    • Banking
    • All kind of apps

    Linux phones, at the moment, are way behind Android/iOS in terms of security and, since privacy requires security, also in privacy.

    Even stock Android has so many more security features, that it's not even close. Verified boot, exploit mitigation, (working) app sandboxing and so on. Not even speaking of specialized projects like GrapheneOS.

    Even if the app ecosystem was there and the OS mature, I'd never run my banking through a Linux phone at the moment.

  • That makes a lot of sense, at least from a subjective point of view. Cheers!

  • Same, but that's not the same as calling all other products mediocre.

  • Plus all those Steam Deck rivals are creating mediocre products

    While I hugely appreciate what Valve has done for Linux Gaming with Proton and the popularity of the Steam Deck, there are excellent Steam Deck rivals out there. Could you clarify what you mean by mediocre?

  • Yeah, the article isn't all that great. Still, the fact that the two exposed employees refused medical treatment suggests to me, that the nature of the substance at least wasn't yet known at that time, since it shouldn't be necessary to even offer that, if the substance was known to be something harmless like baby powder.

    Cheers, though!

  • A court officer opened the letter and powder fell out, according to the New York Police Department, exposing the officer and another court employee to the substance, the source said. The New York City Fire Department said the two refused any medical treatment.

    Uhhh - so two employees were exposed to a yet unknown substance that has to be at least considered to be harmful and were even allowed to refuse medical treatment? Am I missing something here?

  • Oh boy, that is one spicy topic. You could start here.

    In short: The lead dev (who stepped down, but may be back again?) is involved in some controversy.

    While I can fully understand why somebody wouldn't trust the OS based on that, it's still the most secure and private OS available today IMHO.

  • Some sort of user-controllable merging of community views would honestly alleviate most of this:

    Adding something like user-specific topics, e.g. allowing the user to consolidate all posts from instanceA.communityA and instanceB.communityA and even instanceA.communityB into a custom community view shouldn't be all that difficult to implement (he stated naively, having never looked at the codebase).

    A great addition would also be to allow the merging of posts, e.g. show all comments of all threads under one post where the post URL matches and/or the title matches.

    This isn't exact, since multiple communities can discuss the same topic from completely opposite viewpoints, but at least allowing the user to consolidate stuff and control it would be huge.

  • I know that it's a core design feature of Lemmy and the underlying federation, but it's pretty annoying that multiple communities with the same name can exist on different instances while not necessarily following the same ruleset or even purpose.

    The small user base gets even more fractured that way, a lot of posts get reposted to multiple instances as well.

    So you either:

    • subscribe to one or two communities and miss a lot of potentially interesting conversations
    • subscribe to more communities and get flooded with reposts and potentially stuff you don't want to see due to a different ruleset
  • As long as you don't use some shady, unofficial ROM on a phone, most phones are actually vastly more secure than your typical Linux/Windows OS.

  • I'm really not a fan of such gatekeeping rhetoric.

    Congrats on already knowing stuff, I guess. The vast majority of people don't have the ability, will or exposure to engage with most technical stuff, especially since the concept of (digital) privacy still is surprisingly controversial.

    We all benefit from more people caring about privacy. Comments like yours achieve the exact opposite and don't provide any value at all to the conversation.

  • Same here.

    When starting out without having seen all that much of the game beforehand, I saw a great potential for just that expectation you and I shared. The game keeps you jumping from one task to another, managing your initially growing base(s) to produce new necessities, catch new/more pals, explore the map and ...well, that's basically it, so far.

    The gameplay loop so far is pretty barebones and the countless bugs, especially regarding basebuilding and -managing, grew all the more frustrating as I was forced to realize that there simply is no goal or endgame besides catching all the pals, exploring the whole empty map and maybe spend countless hours optimizing it all by breeding the best attributes in your pals, i.e. holding F and waiting.

    A lot of that is hopefully simply a symptom of it being early-access though, I expect to have a better time in a few months when the hype died down and the game has matured a bit more.