lad @ sukhmel @programming.dev

Rust dev, I enjoy reading and playing games, I also usually like to spend t

---

Read more

Posts

4

Comments

1,431

Joined

2 yr. ago

Thanks for the link. I expected there would be a problem with triangle inequality but didn't want to do the actual proving 😅

Some instances has censoring installed, so they really see it that way, and their messages are [REDACTED], as far, as I know.

So since the word contains part that 'is a derogatory term for people of East and Southeast Asian descent', it gets censored

Markers for manmade virus sounds like something you can opt out of if you don't want to follow conventions. The best article I saw about whether it was human made or not stated that the virus has several mutations that made it better accommodated to humans, each of those could appear naturally, all of them appearing naturally is also possible but less likely.

Also no, it's not like you could read a fine print 'Made in China' on a virus, unfortunately. Even if there are traces, those traces are much less definitive than what we can get in normal scale world

I would like to unread this, please

Oh, that explains it. Well, I imagine a license that also forbids people to imagine it. Fuck you and your imagination

The screenshot seems to violate the licence it contains.

I meant 'make sense' to mean 'could rewrite without garbage'. Maybe I was wrong, anyway

I'm afraid, LLMs are gone a bit further from the state when such 'poisoning' made sense.

I'm afraid that soon this may reach a point where it will be easier for LLM to make sense of the text, than for a human, if this idea gets further development.

but what else could be representative /s

once the tool no longer works, you

… try every trick to make it look like it works, blame everyone for not using it, blame everything for not working the way it should, break some things that are made with other tools that work for a good measure (it was their fault for being too arrogant, anyway)

Reminds me of one site that said I shouldn't use 'git secret' because reasons. I've spent quite some time to find what do they propose to use instead (that wasn't as straightforward as in this article), turns out they provide a 'solution' that includes their partners' system to manage secrets. Another bullshit, in other words

You got me, I decided to read the article later (I hope to, at least). But your summary looks about right, I don't really expect C++ to become much safer than it is now, which is not very much. Should take a look at profiles, I love a good laugh

Edit: looked up those ``profiles'', it looks like a vague and complicated proposal that will require an unrealistic amount of undertaking. But that might be seen as being in the spirit of C++

Later: short summary of the conclusion of what the committee does (read 307 minutes)

Edits report to now state 20 miles of railings

It's highly likely that china at least wants other countries to be dependent on themselves

I may prefer being dependent to being conquered by force

You're trying to convince the person who agreed in the first place, this isn't discriminatory.

Take it with a grain of salt, as I am not an expert, but it looks like China would prefer an 'independent' country that is ruled by Chinese government in secret. That way they don't need to fix and repair all the shit, and can only spend bare minimum of effort needed to keep slaves citizens alive

I hope ey finished the job on the Death Star and didn't explode with it. Cause then it would be zero people installing railings afterwards

So, GorrillaX?