sudo22 @ sudo22 @lemmy.world

Posts

16

Comments

166

Joined

2 yr. ago

This title and focus of this article is weird.

"California will ban people from carrying firearms in most public places" and then it goes on about the tax.

I feel like the carry ban is a far larger story then the tax. Not just because its blatantly unconstitutional but it directly opposes very recent rulings from the highest court in America

Saved for later. Thank you!

Legit question, what country is a better real world example?

No? I don't want one, and that's mainly because I don't have the land to test it. Its something I want to do one day once I own significant acherage.

I have however, printed fully functional firearms (G19x, FGC-9, AR-15, others). An RPG is well within feasibility of modern desktop printers. Look on YouTube or FossCAD on Reddit if you don't believe me. RPGs, Grenade Launchers, Silencers, full guns, and plenty other improvised weapons are fully printable with plenty of examples online. And perfectly legal for most US citizens to make.

Sure

(Not me obv but you get the point)

None because you can 3D print those.

Ad hominem attacks. Ah yes I care what you think.

Or just pick another VPN lol. There's not just poison on the table.

Does the native Group VoIP mean voice rooms like Discord are possible now? That feature is pretty much all that's keeping me on discord as of now.

Before anyone tries to argue if the 2A covers bullet capacity, let me introduce you to the chambers gun

Presented to the founding father's in 1792 by its civilian inventor. 224 round capacity. Fully automatic.

The founding father's not only KNEW about high cap autos, they are even confirmed to have seen in action this fully automatic ultra high capacity gun, and they had absolutely no problem with a civilian owning and making them.

How'd that work out for the drug bans? Cause man I could buy so much weed in college (in an illegal state), and trust me I literally never asked.

You're right but, If you bought the bike years ago there's a strong chance you no longer have the receipt/invoice.

Never said it was a bad system in general. But as a normal citizen not engaging in business I think paying taxes possibly 4 times (federal income tax, state income tax, sales tax when first bought new, sales tax when sold as used) on the same item is wrong.

I know that's how it works. I'm complaining because the way it works is bullshit.

I think most of those people don't understand what the $600 rule is and instead thought I was saying scalpers shouldn't be taxed on their ill gotten profits.

Yes? I'm against both of the parties in my comment. Maybe I made it sound like I'm in the scalpers side with my tax complaints, I'm not. I just don't want this government overreach to be placed in a positive light just because its also affecting people we hate.

Fuck scalpers, but I refuse to look at the $600 tax rule as anything other than a way for the government to squeeze money from and spy more on the common people.

Edit: to clarify I'm not rooting for the scalpers, I just don't want this governmental overreach to be put in a positive light just because its also affecting people we rightfully hate.

For those that don't know. The $600 tax rule is a requirement that Zelle, Venmo, etc must report transactions over $600 to the government so they can be taxed. Get a $600 graduation gift from grandma? Taxed. Get $1000 from your roommates to pay rent? You now have to document and show that so its not taxed. Sell a bike (that you ALREADY paid sales tax on using money you ALREADY paid income tax on) for $800, would you look at that its going on the tax form.

When I tap top in Voyager I see this. Maybe you need an update?