subignition @ subignition @kbin.social

Other accounts:

---

Read more

Posts

0

Comments

249

Joined

2 yr. ago

There are already plenty of companies that sell managed data removal like this, Mozilla claims to be doing it better and perhaps they are incrementally more trustworthy than the smaller no name ones

What is wrong with the title? Genuine question. It seems to represent the content of the article pretty accurately.

And yet it gets the screen reflection in its eyes, and the light cast on its fur, convincingly correct. Wild

https://youtu.be/qd2hX721Wjg

What a detailed post, that was a fun read. You clearly live a much more interesting life than some of us

For accuracy, it should be updated to read "Snitches will need stitches."

... :(

I got this super cheap camera off Amazon a while ago, it doesn't have software or any special drivers. You just plug it in and Windows sees it as a generic video device.

https://www.amazon.com/d/B08VJ25PL1

What are you talking about? There are endless services where you can get a free email address without spending a cent. Verifying that an email is genuine is a much harder ask than you might think.

I still remember staring into that giant ball of plasma and thinking it was the coolest thing I'd ever seen in a video game.

It's an absolute tragedy we never got a half-life 3.

I am also using Firefox on Android so it's a mystery to me why the link doesn't work for you. Maybe it markdown will let me send it as plain text:

https://www.cdc.gov/foodsafety/communication/salmonella-and-eggs.html

Removing the bloom, as Americans do, increases porousness and makes it more likely for the internal part of the egg to become contaminated with bacteria, specifically salmonella.

But this would only apply when an external contaminant is introduced between packaging and consumption, since the sanitization process should eliminate any bacteria that was not already inside the egg, I think.

I suppose if poor food handling practices are involved, cross contamination is more likely in a restaurant cooler or something. I was mainly considering the case of home cooks in my earlier replies.

I'm not saying you're wrong. I'm just saying everything I've ever heard and read about says that you should avoid raw American eggs in particular.

That's fair enough. I should note that the CDC link explicitly recommends the use of pasteurized egg products for raw and lightly cooked applications like this.

The first link works fine for me on mobile web. We are on the same instance so that may be the fault of the app you are using to browse Kbin.

And I included the second link because it's a nice fact sheet of egg myths, I'm aware that eggs are handled differently there

Do you have any sources for this claim?

The way they are chemically treated makes them more likely to carry salmonella.

My understanding is that while removing the bloom does make it easier for bacteria to penetrate the shell, because that's done just before packaging, the overall risk of contamination is lower. It's important to note that if the hen is infected there's a possibility for salmonella to be inside the egg regardless.

I don't believe that's true. You are probably thinking of the fact that egg shell becomes more porous when washed - if an egg is dirty or contaminated, washing it increases the chance for bacteria to get inside. I personally try when cracking eggs to minimize the amount of exterior shell that the egg touches, but I'm not sure how much that matters.

Eating raw or undercooked eggs will always be a higher risk. Further reading:

https://www.cdc.gov/foodsafety/communication/salmonella-and-eggs.html
https://www.foodauthority.nsw.gov.au/consumer/special-care-foods/eggs-enjoy-safely/myths-and-facts

Electric Collage would be a great band name.

Your reading comprehension needs work. Have a nice day.

A handcar!

A half-griffin

I'm not arguing that? I'm acknowledging that learning any new software takes some level of effort. Nice straw man though!

Is not looking bad more valuable than the effort involved in one or both of you learning iOS?

Compared to more traditional messaging protocols it could seem that way depending on various factors like time zone differences and how often devices can be online.

It seems like in general, 1:1 conversations will require both participants to be online simultaneously to communicate. Group conversations can have any online participant act as a relay for new messages to offline participants, more or less.

Check out their documentation, particularly the article on how the distributed network works. Also the FAQ is massive! I wish I had the time to read about this in more detail right now

https://docs.jami.net/enUS/user/index.html

Silicon and silicone are two very different things, just FYI. But that does make sense