stevedidwhat_infosec @ stevedidwhat_infosec @infosec.pub

Posts

0

Comments

741

Joined

2 yr. ago

Wait a god damn minute…

You mean to tell me that taking away women’s ability to get medical attention for dangerous pregnancies results in more women opting to abort the problematic pregnancy to save both herself and/or her baby from a lifetime of disability, if not death, and other mental disorders in a country riddled with humanitarian issues???

WHO WOULDVE FUCKING THOUGHT

Sick and tired of creepy fucking weirdos trying to control women in this god damned country. FUCK OFF

Say it FUCKING LOUDER

Just trying to understand - are you saying that it’s not both sides?

I personally think that republicans are more likely to go back on their word, but dems do it as well

To address the problem we need to have the problem in full in front of us if we’re to eradicate the problem and not just swing a pendulum back and forth endlessly until the planet boils us alive

It’s almost always just power plays imo. On both sides.

I think a big problem we have is that our populace is so large. We have a lot of culture and lifestyles to embrace, so politicians in order to appeal to the broad audience wash out most of who they actually are and end up with these surface level generalists who still have personalities below that we won’t see.

Hard to be a singular representative for a large populace and stay popular.

Cry baby snowflake felon is little cry baby snowflake felon - big shocker here

See final step

Ohhh that’s a good point

Hmm… she’s using misogynistic logic and using it against him.

She’s calling his manhood in to question here, hoping to provoke disruption in the base so they would also question his “man-hood”

A lot that success is going to depend on the userbase demographics, although they probably have those figures better than I do.

Either way, I agree that they need to debate. Cannot stand Trump, just wondering about the efficacy of this approach by Harris

Right, which means it can be fairly considered when discussing the real crux of the issue with AI and big tech companies right now, which is the monetization of other peoples content.

If we’re discussing this, we should be looking at whether or not companies are doing this, given they have motive and specific, relevant circumstance to enact such behavior.

Lack of evidence means you need to investigate for said evidence. It does not mean you should not investigate. Privacy advocates, members of any org/cert with an ethics statement should be blowing the whistle on any kind of activity that would mean a users data is not being deleted upon their request, especially considering reddits global usage.

Alright well I guess evidence is needed before we can have ideas - crazy

See!!! I knew this shit was gonna happen. Check out my post from a while back - on chrome and edge, when you hover over the links, they resolve instead of showing you the top link.

This means they can setup infra and evade scanning to redirect probes to legit sites like retailers, bank homepages, etc.

Content is absolutely archived and they have financial incentive to restore the quality of their “knowledge base”

That’s a fair amount of circumstance and motivation to support my idea, regardless of tangible evidence

You’re ignoring the idea that they could still be working on a way to restore content and haven’t completed that process yet

Or that they could start feeding your archived (not cached) data directly to the AI companies anyway for a price

IMO, you can win by jamming your “transmissions” with noise. It’s easier to hide in noise as noise than it Is to be silent IMO. Muddy the waters as it were

Watch how quickly I drop your fucking platform lmao. Please give me a reason

Incel + black pilled + victimized + snowflake

Crazy..

You’re being dramatic as fuck rn lol

Thanks! Fuck Reddit!

Very on brand of .ml to nuke a politics community

To those who are curious enough, try setting up a web scraper. Search for innocuous, perhaps popular but simple words, in a Bing image search. Now look at all the URLs and start grouping by domains.

From my experience in the field, Bing has a problem with malicious websites w/ images that pop up in these results and serve fake AV alert phishing sites.

Stay curious y’all, data analytics can be fun and enlightening

Found the .ml user