Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)ST
Posts
5
Comments
497
Joined
2 yr. ago

  • Because white collar workers don't think they need to unionize, as their buying power erodes. An engineer today makes, inflation adjusted, drastically less than an engineer in previous generations. Many of my friends grandparents were engineers and were happily retiring at 40 years old. How often do you see that today?

    This trend will not slow. Engineers will work for McDonalds wages and not unionize because "I'm an engineer, I don't need to do that!"

    We shouldn't let perceived self-importance get weaponized against our own best-interests, but we do.

    (Apply same analogy to other educated fields, it's all the same bull, diff titles diff jargon. Same getting fucked.)

  • True, wish they'd add, "This will fix approximately x% of pipes across the nation!"

    But I know why they can't do that, "politics", because there is a considerable amount of people who would say, 5/10/15%! That's awful, I'm voting for the guy who founded the lead pacifier company! He's tall!

    But.. when you consider :
    1, We consider cave people to be stupid
    2, Not enough time has passed for the brain to evolve since we were cave people

    It makes a bit more sense, we truly are standing on the shoulders of giants. Or in other words, humans are real ducking dumb. We're all cave people.

  • The bullshit asymmetry principle.

    It takes far more text to disprove bullshit than spout the bullshit itself.

    Then, to prevent your followers from reading the debunking, introduce, "Lol libs sure do write a lot, they do that because they are dumb and triggered!"

    And, "I love the poorly educated" (because they haven't been taught how to apply reason to arguments so they can't see through my historically well-known hate tactics because they don't read books.)

    But they do understand, "Sleepy Joe!" "Crooked Hillary!"

    So yeah, you're encountering bullshit asymmetry, it sucks and our job is hard, but hey, since we are on the topic of slogans, let me paraphrase a famous one. "We do this thing or that thing not because it is easy, but because it is hard."

    The decision you are left with is knowing when to talk and when to walk away from someone who isn't ready to listen.

  • The entire conservative, pro cop playbook is "say silly things, pretend you don't know they're silly".

    And if anyone calls you out, act offended. Everyone knows if you are offended you are right. Growing up in a religious household it's incredible how many times I saw someone use, "You're rude therefore you are wrong" as a core tenant of "debate".

    The 'victim card' is the conservative 'race card'.

  • I like it too, learned hiragana and katanana in two weeks.

    Kanji I'm doing with flash cards tho, and supplementally I read Japanese children's stories since Duolingo alone isn't enough to actually learn.

    Finally I use Meetup and attend language practice sessions so I can use it with native speakers.

  • Conservatives have a lot to gain by building bots to antagonize and convert naive young (and old) people by plastering their dumb ideas everywhere. It's marketing, if you're cruel and dumb they want you on their team.

    Why do they allow it? Many reasons I'd guess.. engagement , capitalism, shared-beliefs.

    Controversial things generate engagement.
    Engagement generates profits.
    Many of the decision makers are narcissistic conservatives who think the same thing, but instead of saying it they just enable it, indirectly achieving the same goal as hate-evangelizing.

    A surprising amount of people want to watch the world burn, as long as they can do it from a balcony.

  • "If higher education faculty are beholden to saying what powerful people want them to say, and if they stray out of the line they're going to get fired, we are living in an authoritarian society," she said.

    Yep.
    So much for the first amendment?
    "These students are protesting, clearly illegal, arrest them."

    Before these protests, I truly didn't expect that type of response from universities to free speech, who are these fascist administrators? What country do I live in? Not one where free speech is protected, apparently.

  • It's so nice of the US to offload corporate responsibility to individual citizens. None of the money of course. But you all need to do your part to keep the quarterly earnings up!

    I'll sacrifice mine and my family's life to the line! All praise the line, line go up!

  • Two kinds of people.
    1
    I suffered to get where I am, no one should have to go through that, we can do better.
    2
    I suffered to get where I am, everyone should suffer like I did.

    The conservative mindset is #2, "No one should have it better than me!"

  • I'm glad she's doing this, but for reasons opposite her agenda.

    I grew up long enough ago to remember the vitriolic hatred people had at even a suggestion that they might be gay. Kids would violently attack other kids to assert their straightness. And hearing the f-word was a regular occurrence. Literally any disagreement? F-word came out.

    I could be wrong about this, I'm not a kid today, but I assume kids today don't understand how bad it was. I'm glad she's doing this because the majority of kids are fine with gay and queer lifestyles in a way that would have bent my tiny brain when I was a kid. So they might have a hard time imagining how strong the hate for those things once was.

    This woman serves as a villain, to show kids that hate is still out there and that being an ally to the queer community matters. I think that her plan will eventually backfire, because the way to combat folks like her is to normalize being gay even more than it is now.

    She will go down in history as a relic of hate. A woman to be pitied and nothing more.

    How awful that she ruins peoples' lives as a game. What a horrid husk of a person.

  • If this were to come to pass, it would be a massive hit to the middle class. Truckers make up a HUGE part of the American middle class work force.

    Also consider the economic impact to all of the gas stations and rest stops created primarily to service them, a huge amount of infrastructure exists to service truckers. That said, many could convert for autonomous service needs? I expect it to be a net loss for them also. RIP Loves?

    And from a technical point of view, it's a lesser challenge than generalized self-driving because point A and B are already known for each route, so more of the route could be "hardcoded" (not actually hardcoded but I think you get the concept).

    That said, I can't predict the timeline of when this would be feasible, but when it happens I expect it will cause a lot of anger from truckers.

    Anyway, the jist of my comment, this will route a substantial amount of middle class wages from the truckers to the truck owners, increasing inequality even further.

    This is the biggest catalyst to sway the public toward a UBI than anything else I can imagine.