You say that, but I've had my credit card call me about a charge and the information they asked was too specific. I hung up and called the official number and they confirmed it was indeed true and didn't understand why I thought the way they did it was a scam.
QD-OLED just came into the market in the past couple years and is definitely worth some hype for someone like me that was hanging onto an old plasma, but in general TV's have been excellent for ages, if you already have an OLED or higher end TV with HDR you probably don't need to upgrade for a long time.
I still won't consider an AMD GPU because all 3 I've had throughout my life have had horrible driver experiences. Even the FirePro I had at work at one point required a special driver build that AMD eventually gave me to work even half decent. Never had any major issues with NVidia drivers.
Mostly just makers and paying attention to how products in general are built. Anything else I find that people get too "clever" with their designs rather than developing an efficient solution. The key to being a good designer is being able to combine and apply simple mechanical principles into a design that efficiently solves the problem. Many people online skip the efficient aolution part in order to make the design look "cool" but is effectively useless for a anything practical.
I store my PLA and PETG in the bags they come in and have never done anything past that because I've never had an issue. I think people are far too concerned about filament being dry over a few filaments where it is actually important like Nylon.
Note that this is a "contributor" post, which is essentially their sneaky wording for editorial. It isn't a real Forbes article and anyone that knows the Forbes website won't pay any attention to the article.
I think Qualcomm is probably charging far too much for the SoC. Their pricing has been super high for years because they know nobody is matching their performance on the mobile space. Not sure how much of it is the smaller process nodes too.
That means that over and above whatever debts they have, they think the market values the data their users have given them is worth that much. That said, if Google is only paying then $60M/year for access to that data, they are going to need a lot of customers like that to reach $6.4B valuation.
1TB is easy, a sata to usb 3.0 adapter is like $10 and will transfer all that data in a few hours. If you are more patient just setup the drive as shared in windows and transfer it over the network. I just copied about 7TB a few weeks ago to a new NAS over the network and I had it done over the weekend.
On PC I'll buy digital because worst case if it comes unavailable I'll torrent a copy.
For consoles I am staunchly in the physical camp because it is more likely I'll be able to play those games in 10 years when the maker has shut down their store.
It isn't, but when you are a small project the law is inconsequential if a massive corporation goes after you and you don't have the money for the legal battle.
I bought a cheap induction element after my landlord replaced my cooktop with one that I hate because the elements are tiny. It is so much better than a standard cooktop that I pretty much use it exclusively.
I put loose leaf tea (usually a blended black tea such as English breakfast) in a basket in my mug and then pour boiling water from my kettle over it and let it sit for about 3-4 minutes. Remove the tea and add a bit of sugar and milk, stir and enjoy. I've got one of those "smart" mugs so my tea stays hot for the entire time I'm drinking it.
This is really nothing special in the world of IPOs, companies offer their initial shares to specific parties before the public is able to puchase them. These are typically investors, employees, etc.
It would be a pretty big problem if it was found that the financial company administering the IPO was to share personally identifiable information to Reddit. SEC rules actually have teeth, so I wouldn't be too worried about them lying about it. It does look like you have to provide them a name to register so sure they might have that associated with your account if they don't already, but it does help prevent selling the opportunity to buy.
It isn't helpful to spread FUD here when you are discussing something like the offering of securities products which have very defined procedures that the offering party must follow. This is one area you don't want to fuck around and find out about.
You say that, but I've had my credit card call me about a charge and the information they asked was too specific. I hung up and called the official number and they confirmed it was indeed true and didn't understand why I thought the way they did it was a scam.