Skip Navigation

Posts
33
Comments
531
Joined
1 yr. ago

  • Its more to do with the connotation of calling something a meme.

    Maybe I am out of the loop but the description for a meme that was previously given has never occupied my mind whilst seeing a meme.

    Eat the rich with the laymen's understanding of a meme does not fit the perceived definition.

    Where as eat the rich and its evolution still has the same connotation as it had when first spoken, most likely due to it be a quite with historical meaning.

    I am wrong with the given definition but I still see there being understandable confusion and a need for meme to evolve for it to used without confusion.

  • In 50 years if "meme" evolves in the general dialect to have these connotations you pointed out I'll feel better about it

  • This is one step further than the peeps with win xp theming!

  • Its not a meme, its a historical quotes. Unless your saying you see it as a meme, which to me a meme is silly and easily thrown away

  • Its from the French revolution you silly person

  • I thought this shit was a meme till I started texting someone yesterday to arrange a date, she said "you don't have iPhone?"...

  • I am going to be lazy I hope you dont mind but someone said something very similar to what you have said and here is my response

    Sadly I didn't have access to tech till 2015ish lol but I know of Netscape and I know software was a lot harder to master forsure, this evolved though.

    I'm not harkening back to some rose tinted glasses version of early computing rather I see an issue where the bar to entry is set very high for both hardware and developers as the sheer amount of code, knowledge and hours to build a compatible modern web browser is mad. I dont think modulising the browser equates to harder to use as we made phone with operating systems that were once alien which have a very modular approach when I click a YouTube link in my phones browser it opens the YouTube client, if I click a PDF it opens the PDF client, if I click a phone number it opens the dialer. and so on.

  • Sadly I didn't have access to tech till 2015ish lol but I know of Netscape and I know software was a lot harder to master forsure, this evolved though.

    I'm not harkening back to some rose tinted glasses version of early computing rather I see an issue where the bar to entry is set very high for both hardware and developers as the sheer amount of code, knowledge and hours to build a compatible modern web browser is mad. I dont think modulising the browser equates to harder to use as we made phone with operating systems that were once alien which have a very modular approach when I click a YouTube link in my phones browser it opens the YouTube client, if I click a PDF it opens the PDF client, if I click a phone number it opens the dialer. and so on.

  • If I wanted to download arch linux torrent I can go to arch's download page, click the magnet icon and my torrent manager open and downloads the file. Now if browsers were stripped down tomorrow people had to relearn how to use chrome/Firefox then yea it would definitely be problematic.

  • This is very true, maybe the quite comfort is the enemy of progress fits here.

  • assassinate the top 1%.

    If each of us able bodied where to go and collect scalps of the top 1% we'd have a fighting chance.

  • 7z is a poser, winrar.exe is the only true encryption

  • It would be weird not seeing the message

  • Weird as shit take.

  • This is what I had thought, where I was confused was the vast amount of comments in the linked post stating flatly that charging for software went against foss

  • Another factor is the spaces that offices take up or the power used whilst unoccupied, these space could be used for housing or maybe even industry.

    Its great that no one drives to your work but this is more uncommon than common.

    In conclusion: work from home is better.

  • Thank you for clearing this up, the comments in the linked post where having me question myself