Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)SP
Posts
1
Comments
134
Joined
2 yr. ago

  • nah, it’s better for information integrity to reply in the language you understand imo, comments translated using translator services are very obvious anyway and some people are multilingual

    Sure, I agree? Maybe there's a misunderstanding here and I should add that it simply would never even occur to me to enter a conversation if I didn't natively understand the language that's being used.

  • I often reply under Japanese posts, and I always assume users will use a translator as I do, but maybe in the context of a Japanese this may look rude?

    Can't speak for others (obviously, as this is about individual etiquette perceptions) but I would consider it to be polite to only enter conversations with unknown parties in languages that the parties have shown to be capable of speaking and understanding.
    Using a new language entering a conversation would therefore signal either familiarity ("I know they understand me") or rudeness ("I don't care if they understand me") to me, I suppose.

  • Whether to flee or fight isn't a very useful distinction, I think. It's a false dichotomy.

    Fighting someone or fighting for something in a way that risks your life just isn't a very smart way to fight. Obviously run when your life is at stake. When you're safe, fight.

  • It’s so much easier to set up and install than Matrix.

    Unbelievably so. Mumble is... basically one setup command. Don't even need a domain. And it needs absolutely no resources, can run on a Pi Zero.
    Setting up my own Matrix server was honestly one of the most difficult things I've ever attempted in decades of non-professionally using computers and I'm still not sure I'd be able to properly take care of the installation if it breaks. Sooo many moving parts. All the federation-oriented projects that rely on adoption rates reaaaaally desperately need setup wizards before any other additional feature.

  • that it’s an artificially engineered “crisis” by the medical industrial complex to justify modern day discrimination and refuse to provide healthcare to fat people, Black people, etc
    podcast episode on this

    Thanks! I'm slightly confused by the sources linked in the podcast description though. While it's pretty US-centric they universally seem to confirm that yes, obesity rates are rising and that yes, medical consensus is that obesity is a bad thing. Does the podcast then come to some kind of different conclusion?
    I don't have a hard time believing that American companies are profiteering off of sick people, but I feel like there might be some accidental shuffling of cause and effect here. You can fleece and discriminate against a fat person, but in order for that to happen you first need a fat person, don't you?

  • These are the people who then say that if you gain weight it is because you are lazy or weak willed.

    Whether someone perceives it as hard to lose or not gain weight doesn't really factor into it, does it? For adults the ultimate decision to eat more than one needs lies with exactly one person.

    Really it is 99% hormones and only 1% strength of character.

    I'm not sure I understand correctly, are you suggesting that obesity epidemics have some kind of shared underlying physiological reason?

  • For music, offline play is already available via Finamp. For everything else I'm personally making due with the regular Download feature that just gives yout the raw files. But then again it doesn't really come up often, since I don't really consume anything but audiobooks when I'm on the go.

  • We need to stop discussing server costs without including actual numbers.

    Why? The premise is that the costs might be too expensive for someone. Whether someone finds paying 12€/a too expensive or 1200€/a too expensive doesn't really make a difference. Either way it's too expensive, isn't it? 🤗

  • Sorry, I misread. What is bad about the UX exactly? You don’t need to customize anything if you don’t want to; “it just works”. And I dont follow you on how having the option to customize things makes it a bad user experience. You’re assuming the native UI is bad for some reason.

    Being given the tools to customize something by hand is not the same as being offered enough option to simply choose what you want. Having a good UX means that there was a UI designer who alread did the customzing for you and you simply have click a button to apply it.

  • Servers and bandwidth can be expensive yo

    Doesn't that just mean federation instance maintainers are self-selected among those members of the community who can afford them in the first place? It's just a less distributed form of a donation system. Instead of relying on 50 people making a 1$ donation each to pay a 50$ hosting bill, you rely on one person (the maintainer of the instance) making a single 50$ donation. That the maintainer wants to donate is already established, how much they can afford to donate can always be reflected by how much they're willing to let their instance grow.
    That doesn't bode well for the longevity of any single instance, but I've always assumed the general idea was to have as many small instances as possible anyway instead of few big ones, otherwise what's the point of federation. And if you avoid big instances then there will never be a need to funnel funds into big hosting bills.

  • It’s pretty amazing that it’s as cohesive as it is.

    That's a very good point. I've often wondered that myself. We may have reached peak Linux already - it's so hard to scale up massive FOSS projects without somehow sacrificing ideals on the way.

  • Many things in a FOSS ecosystem will sooner or later confront you with one hard truth:

    The program you're using was not developed for you.

    It was developed because the creator saw a problem and wanted to fix it. Then they made a program to fix it and stopped refining the program the moment they were content with it. Little to no consideration for other users or mass-adoption. Which is fine, they developed it, it's their time.
    But it also means that you will frequently be confronted with things that are objectively unintuitive and unreasonable from a new user's perspective because they make sense from a developer's perspective. The former will always be outranked by the latter, even though there will always be more users than developers. Unfortunately that's just how it is. There are some few exceptions, but they are just that, exceptions.