sparr @ sparr @lemmy.world

Posts

5

Comments

113

Joined

2 yr. ago

Oh no. That's tragic. It looks like they are on a direct path to shutting down later this year.

Using a “laundry basket with a search robot” IS inherently a worse way to store data than a “file system with hierarchy”.

Nested folders are reliable and predictable.

Tagging is also a good option.

Relying on search that is likely to fail in predictable ways is an awful way to do anything serious. And therein lies the problem... These people have mostly never done serious work with a computer before, that other people rely on. As soon as someone else stands to lose money or fail a class because you can't find a file, the distinction will come into sharp focus.

https://www.pcgamer.com/students-dont-know-what-files-and-folders-are-professors-say/

Students don't know what files and folders are, professors say A whole generation has grown up with powerful search functions, and don't think about computers the same way.

Apparently this has become a widespread problem in colleges starting in the last decade.

https://miraheze.org/ is a great wiki hosting community

"this day and age" is rapidly coming to a close

They could have used a mailing list or an rss feed or half a dozen other solutions that don't require a special website or government app.

I wasn't referring to managing. I was referring to posting, as a user. If you haven't done that either, that doesn't mean you can't find all the discussions and decisions and rules and policies people came up with over the last four decades.

It could be implemented on both the server and the client, with the client trusting the server most of the time and spot checking occasionally to keep the server honest.

The origins of upvotes and downvotes are already revealed on objects on Lemmy and most other fediverse platforms. However, this is not an absolute requirement; there are cryptographic solutions that allow verifying vote aggregation without identifying vote origins, but they are mathematically expensive.

Web of trust is the solution. Show me vote totals that only count people I trust, 90% of people they trust, 81% of people they trust, etc. (0.9 multiplier should be configurable if possible!)

As with almost every other question about the fediverse, we already discussed this to death decades ago and came up with the answers for email. Do what you'd do for two mailing lists on the same topic.

I expect most clients, including the official web client, to have "meta-community" support soon, which will include the ability to meta together communities with the same name on different instances.

That's not true, it's just very computationally expensive to make it secure and private. There are cryptographic solutions these problems.

Web of trust. The biggest thing missing from most attempts to build social networks so far. A few sites did very weak versions, like Slashdot/s friend/foe/fan/freak rating system.

Let me subscribe, upvote, downvote, filter, etc specific content. Let me trust (or negative-trust) other users (think of it like "friend" or "block", in simple terms)

Then, and this is the key... let me apply filters based on the sub/up/down/filter/etc actions of the people I trust, and the people they trust, etc, with diminishing returns as it gets farther away and based on how much people trust each other.

Finally, when I see problematic content, let me see the chain of trust that exposed me to it. If I trust you and you trust a Nazi, I may or may not spend time trying to convince you to un-trust that person, but if you fail or refuse then I can un-trust you to get Nazi(s) out of my feed.