snooggums @ spankmonkey @lemmy.world

Also known as snooggums on midwest.social and kbin.social.

---

Read more

Posts

1

Comments

3,877

Joined

2 yr. ago

I don’t use ChatGPT

Then why are you defending it? Is it necessary for every complaint about AI to have a wall of text clarifying that when we are complaining about extremely common issues with AI that is being forced on everyone that we are using shorthand for those specific issues for those AI implementations based on the context of what is currently being discussed?

In this case I am specifically complaining about ChatGPT and similar implementations. Kind of like when I complain about IPA beers I'm not complaining about every single beer that has ever been made.

Yes, the summary is right but also extremely verbose and redundant. Like the first or very last sentence covered everything. Like how many times does it need to repeat the same thing over and over again?

I'm apparently ahead of the game as I've already made it to depression.

Don't expect to make it to acceptance, unless coping counts.

Go ask chatGPT

Then why post it at all?

Search engines and Wikipedia don't judge you for asking stupid questions either.

Do you click on the links?

If they are links from the search, isn't that just the same thing as doing a regular search and verifying the results?

What does this extra layer add other than an unreliable middleman who is extremely inefficient?

long division

Let's just keep adding more and more layers like a game of telephone!

Van Helsing is such a fun movie.

Not the same thing.

google allows for the possibility that the user was able to think critically about sources that a search returned

chapGPT is drunk uncle confidently stating a thing they heard third hand from Janet in accounting and then taking him at his word

google: I checked the listing of news sites to find information about a world event directly from professionals who double check their sources

chatGPT: I asked my hairstylist their uninformed opinion on a world event based on overheard conversations

I mean a moron could find the wrong information from google and your hairstylist could get lucky and be right, but odds are one source provides the opportunity for reliable results and the other is random and has a massive shit ton of downsides.

Wasn't funny.

Legislation only happens due to public pressure.

Or a few wealthy people who want something bad enough to throw money at.

That would cost money silly!

I asked ChatGPT

Why do people bring this up every fucking time?

It is obviously pretending to be a pufferfish.

look at the person in the brown coat on the right. their glasses and eyes melted together.

No, that is because frames frequently have a lighter color/clear on the inside of the frame so they aren't as distracting. Tufts of hair near ears can also make things look wonky when you can't see fhe individual hairs. Blurry hands tends to be moving. This is a low quality image and the 'blending' effects are just normal potato image quality.

AI would not be able to get buy holding glasses while face in hands right,l (the black line above his ear is hair), would have screwed up the shoe logos, and a bunch of other small details.

It also beads up when you don't shave. Had that yesterday with my hairy gorilla arms when sitting still and trying to cool off.

As used around here in the US it is fancy finger foods, usually appetizers. But we also tend to use the words differently than the source, like we use entree for the main part of the meal.

Gotta hit that landing strip between the sidewalk and the curb!