Skip Navigation

User banner
Posts
5
Comments
257
Joined
2 yr. ago

  • He really was advanced for his time

  • rule

    Jump
  • I thought that was an L3 at first.

    Damn I am playing too much War Thunder.

  • That wasn't a coincidence, I watched a video some time ago, where they used tensor flow to do exactly that.

    (I'm doing my CS bachelors btw)

  • Dibbs

    Jump
  • Yes indeed

  • Most of these AI generated Filmposters are completely tasteless and edgy.

    I have seen post like that humorising the Holocaust and Nazism in general.

    For example there is this picture where you can see a pixar-stlye cartoonist version of Hitler smiling in the foreground (which wouldn't be a problem on it's own) and a concentration camp in the background with many people clothed in the worker clothing of prisoners in German concentration camps, you can even spot some yellow david stars, everyone is smiling.

    What this does is make Hitler look like a goofy person, which can't be hold accountable for his mistakes as well as show a kind of positive unity between the inmates and the regime which, in my point of view, is denying the mass murder of 6 million Jews as well as many other people in concentration camps or sweetens the reality of it by showing it in a way that it does not seem brutal or even criminal, like the human made hell it was.

    There is a border where "satire" is so edgy that it just insults people and really isn't satire anymore, because there really isn't a point in this that makes fun of the Nazis in a way that would insult them, for what deluded human shit they were and are.

    OP surely didn't have any noble intentions and just wanted to be edgy because they don't have seen nor understood the reality that was the holocaust.

  • Dibbs

    Jump
  • I think I called it that, because this would be the literal translation of "Fingerhut" (the German word) and I sounded right so I guessed it would be the same in English.

    (I edited the comment, because I actually made a mistake in the first place)

  • Yeah I know, but the press picks some rare cases and says, that this goes for all.

    You know how it is.

  • Ok then picture this: A webscrapper is copying code that has copyright that indicates, that it is forbidden to modify this code, to publish it under a different name or to sell this code (for example a method that calculates the inverse square root really fast).

    By using the code as training data, most language models may actually paste this code or write it with little change, because most language models are based not on writing something that has a purpose that is given by the user, like for example AI's that are supposed to evaluate pictures of dogs and cats and is supposed to decide which is which, but they are based on the following schematic:

    1. Read previous text
    2. Predict, what letter will follow
    3. Repeat until user interferes.

    Because language models work this way, if I would for example only train it on the novsl "Alice in Wonderland", then there is a high possibly, that the model will reproduce parts of it.

    But there is a way to fix this problem: If we broaden the training data very much, the chance the output would be considered plagiarism will narrow down.

    Upon closer inspection there is another problem though, because AI (at this point in time), don't have an influence from outside in a sense like humans do: A human is experiencing every day of their life with there being a chance of something happening, that modifies their brain structure through emotion, like for example a chronic depression. This influences the output of a person not only in their symptoms, but also in the way they would write text for example.

    The consequence is that the artist may use this emotional change to express it with their art.

    Every day influences the artist differently and inspires them with unseen and new thoughts.

    The AI (today) has the problem that they definitely retell the stories it has heard again and again like Aristotle (?) says.

    The outer influence is missing to the AI at this point in time.

    If you want to have a model that can give you things, that never have been written before or don't even seem like anything that there has ever been, you have to give it these outer influences.

    And there is a big problem coming up, because, yes this process could be implemented by training the AI even further after it already was launched, by reinforced learning, but this process would still need data input from humans, which is really annoying.

    A way to make it easier would be to give an AI a device on which it can run and sensors as well as output devices, so that it can learn from its sensors and use this information in its post-training training phase to gather more data and make current events, that it perceives, relevant.

    As you can see, if we would do that, then we would have an AI that could do anything, and learn from anything, which both makes it really really fucking dangerous, but also really really fucking interesting.

  • More like theft of data = "communism"

  • Nice pfp, have a nice day, lad

  • Dibbs

    Jump
  • True either dog or fingerhat

  • Rule

    Jump
  • Oh look they seem like really good friends

  • Manga source pls 🥹👉👈

  • Wait you do number five on the shidder?

  • I will press the button and you won't stop me

  • Runs behind Khajit, searches for random chest in the grass, fucking steals all of Khajits wares.

  • rule

    Jump
  • I've got a good one:

    What have taco bell and a sex shop in common:

    They both make your ass hurt.