Soviet Snake @ sovietsnake @lemmygrad.ml

*It is not the consciousness of men that determines their being, but, on th

---

Read more

Posts

41

Comments

143

Joined

3 yr. ago

On Telegram you don't get "news" in the sense of articles like what you see on world news. You get short messages with photos and videos updated by the minute, when do bombings start, operations being carried out. For example when the whole Prigozhin thing happened, I was constantly being updated while the mainstream media released articles hours after some important thing I already knew.

I don't understand, what are they exactly trying to sell them? Subscription for what applications?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_x_MMPF-ags

FUCKING LOL, LOOK AT BIDEN'S FACE.

It seems they were talking about environmentalism and lifting people out of poverty, since that's what currently causing more people to suffer. I don't think we'll see much development in that front but I also don't think invading a country or installing a Western puppet regime to "favour women" is going to do much help in the region.

How dare they keep archives of things! Simply authocratically authoritarinisticly imperialidously!

Snow flattens the terrain and makes it easier for tanks to move, as far as I know, which gives Russia quite a big advantage since they have a lot of them and Ukraine doesn't. Moreover, it requires preparation and special equipment which Ukraine also probably lacks, and which is easier to transport for Russia.

relationship goals

I assume in winter since that is when tanks have better maneuverability

I don't think it would be something extravagantly huge, but probably just take what's left of the relevant oblasts they need, since also Western support doesn't seem to last much longer, but maybe it could be prolonged more year.

It would help if it showed total territory gained but I guess that shows too much truth. Keep in mind Russia will start an offensive soon which will probably be very definite and up the ante some more.

I watched and I found it a very sober analysis. It always makes me go nuts how these people can have such a clear thinking but at the same time they stand for such shitty politics, the "don't thread on me" flag at the end really shocked me to be honest, lol. Still, amazing these people are having better takes than the supposed "left" in the US.

Usonians will never believe this.

Fucking die already you Western chauvinist pigs.

"War-fighting alliance"

NATO is not a group for war tho!

I think Heraclitus case is more based since he literally speaks about the inherent dialectics in all sense of life, and the fact that they cannot understand it, which is literally what happens with liberals, not being able to understand dialectical materialism, so the resonance is bigger. While people say Heraclitus thought that fire was the arche, it honestly was just a metaphor for the logos (dialectics).

The only surviving texts by Heraclitus are called "Fragments" which are surviving pieces of supposedly the only written book by him. All of these were scattered from others sources such as citations and paraphrasing of his text. For II and III Kahn refers to fragments 2 and 3 of his ordering of the fragments (there is a debate about the ordering except for I where there are 2 other sources of his time that declare that fragment as the beginning of Heraclitus' book).

They appear in the screenshot, but I will paste them as text below:

II (D. 34) Not comprehending, they hear like the deaf. The saying bears witness to them: absent while present.

III (D. 2) Although the account (logos) is shared, most men live as though their thinking (phronesis) were a private possession.

The D. # refers to the Diels-Kranz numbering, which is what's been used as the default before and even after Kahn's. If you have any doubt about the meaning let me know, but I'd argue reading Heraclitus is really good for understanding dialectics and his philosophy still holds true in some way until today.

cerra el orto entonces vende patria

In my work I've had to fill out that kind of forms a couple of times for Latinos and some have this options "Cuban, Hispanic, Mexican, Puerto Rican". It makes total sense.

To the lost democrats reading this, this also applies to you, not only to republicans. Both of you are liberals, only one of you is more honest with what they want to do with minorities.