southsamurai @ southsamurai @sh.itjust.works

Posts

12

Comments

4,195

Joined

2 yr. ago

She's a pretty girl. Order her the nuggets, maybe she'll hop in the car and you can take her home.

Great post! Definitely unpopular on every level, and with a solid explanation of your reasoning.

I don't agree, not in the way it's presented, but it's still an awesome post.

The reason I don't agree is that it isn't practical. Well, not in the way it would need to be to make it useful.

See, it's not enough that a person be a donor for their organs to be useful. They have to die in the right place, at the right time, and in a way that doesn't otherwise prevent viability. The difficulties of matching a donor to a living recipient isn't really limited by people checking the box to be a donor. Not opting in just pushes the decision off to the next of kin. Making it opt out isn't going to solve the limitations, so there's no need to deal with all the legal rigamarole to get a system for opt-out in place, much less mandatory.

As far as donating to science goes, the limitation is less about donors again. It's proximity vs usefulness vs cost. You'd first have to overcome the social factor where the kin of the dead have a valid claim to determine disposition of remains, which is a huge barrier when trying to enact it.

But they you still run into being able to get a body to a "science" in a reasonable timeframe. Which isn't always possible. If I die right now, the chances of me getting to a program that can prepare my body for much of anything before decomposition would set in is low. Not impossible, just difficult because even that teaching hospital in the next county doesn't use cadavers for education, or experimentation.

I'm too far away from any of the "body farms" for use in that field of research. Even if decomposition wasn't a factor, anthropology and osteology programs don't really need more bones. So, if I specifically wanted my remains to go to something like that, I'd have to pay for it. Which is no longer donation in my mind, it's just an unusual funeral. When my bones got to whatever university was willing to store them, they'll sit in a box in a room and never do anything useful.

There would need to be something unusual about my remains for them to be useful in education at this point.

Medical research doesn't need dead bodies often.

So what science is it going to?

The answer is none because the number of people voluntarily donating is already meeting demand for research.

But, hey, maybe it would be worth setting up a cadaver transportation and storage system anyway. Maybe future research would need them. But, it would need to be set up. Preservation has to be done locally, so tack it onto existing medical examiner's offices. They apply whatever method is determined to be best to the bodies. Then they ship them to some kind of centralized storage. We can build those over existing cemeteries, so it'll be decades before we run out of land to build them on.

Once there, staff would maintain the remains. Most likely frozen, since chemical preservation causes other hassles. So you'd have freezer cemeteries that can build upwards instead of outwards, which is definitely a good thing.

Then, they can stay there until someone needs a dead body, but doesn't need it freshly dead. Even has the side benefit of still allowed kin to visit!

But, still, dead bodies aren't very useful for "science". Great for training new doctors though. So we'd always have enough on standby for that.

I doubt it'll ever be redesigned.

The reason it's badly designed as is, is that people wanted specific inclusion into the primary symbol. There's really no way to change a rainbow; it's the standard spectrum of visible light being used as a symbol of everyone in their diversity being part of a group.

To be any more inclusive, you have to put things on top of the already inclusive rainbow. A corner piece or an inset is the only way to do that that isn't horrible looking no matter what it is.

The chevrons from the side are at least visually balanced, though not well chosen colorwise. Then again, the representative colors weren't chosen with being added to a flag in the first place.

Once you start changing an established symbol rather than just coming up with a new one, design goes out the window. It's no longer cohesive because it can't be. It's like the difference between someone planning a tattoo that covers their arm, and someone getting a few dozen tattoos on their arm. Shoving things together without a plan ahead of time is airways going to be less visually pleasing.

But, visual pleasance isn't what the flag is for, so maybe it's more effective than something planned from the beginning. I dunno, but the fact that it isn't "just" a rainbow does mean you can't mistake it for someone liking rainbows in general, so that could be a benefit of that change.

I don't agree that the original rainbow flag has too many colors though. If you don't have the standard color spectrum there, it isn't a rainbow to most people's minds, so it would be worse design. The standard ROYGBV is standard for a pigment rainbow for a good reason.

Could be worse.

Could be out there without a chicken

We have household joke that the hen is allowed to eat our eyeballs, particularly if we're dead, but not limited to that state.

Oh yeah, chickens will wreck lizards, alive or dead.

They really are predators, just not exclusively so.

Our rooster sometimes gets in the mood and will go out into the brush and run down mice and such. The hens usually just grab what comes to them though. They're plenty satisfied with their feed, the occasional egg that they don't want around, and bugs. But if a small rodent catches their eyes, it is on. There will be mighty roars! Okay, more loud and satisfied buking with the sounds of thrashing as they dismember their prey.

But they aren't really mean per se. They're just driven by instincts more than a lot of critters. They see blood, and that means food, even if it's a flock member bleeding. They have to establish their hierarchy within the flock, and that does come with some (okay, a lot sometimes) pecking, but it isn't being done just for the fun of it. It admissions maintains a stable flock and ensures resources for the ones that are on top if resources run low.

As long as there's plenty of food and space, they don't kill each other intentionally, as in to eat. They're just highly motivated, and it goes bad sometimes.

They can be really sweet to each other, and to humans. My little hen is sitting here on the arm of the couch preening and seeking attention as I type this. Every evening when she comes in, we cuddle a bit before she naps. And she'll nestle with both the other birds at times as well. She'll also keep both of them in line with pecks as needed, including the big numpty of a rooster that's twice her size, but ten minutes later they'll be in their little spots next to each other being companionable.

They aren't exactly smart, or even highly complex in the way you might expect birds to be if you've been around parrots and their ilk. But they do have that mix of vicious instinct and affection that a lot of social animals have.

If you're interested, in my post history, last sunday I did my usual weekly comment in the !casualconversation@piefed.social pets sunday post. I put pictures of our three in the comment. The community used to be at !casualconversation@lemm.ee , but that instance is shutting down. But I've been telling stories about our adventures in chickening for a while now. They are endlessly entertaining to me lol.

Well, the degree and severity of what you're describing isn't what most people experience, and it seems like it is at an unhealthy degree of frequency and severity.

I would say that anyone experiencing that kind of inner turmoil would benefit from evaluation and treatment. Trying to diagnose someone online is a sucker's bet even if you're a qualified professional, and I seriously doubt you're going to find one of those here on lemmy randomly. But, yeah, if a family member or friend out here in meatspace told me they were experiencing that, I'd be helping them find either a psychiatrist or other mental health provider sooner rather than later.

Most people do experience at least occasional intrusive thoughts, but not to that level. It's very good that you recognize it's an inner voice rather than a separate source though. It does tend to mean you'll respond well to one or more of the various treatment options, which will depend in exactly what the root cause is. Likely, there would be a combination of medications and talk therapy of some variation or another.

And, I suspect that even though most people need to try a few meds before they find the best options, that you will likely get relief quickly once that happens. So you'll be able to approach other treatments and benefit from them quickly as well.

It is when they're acting as a police force.

Pfft, that's target practice

You know, my favorite thing about that channel is that they both explain why something can't happen, and then go into great detail about how horrible it would be if it did. They fully commit to the questions.

Man, rizz is the new yeet, and both belong on the pedestal of excellent slang.

Im finna yeet rizz into heavy rotation

Hell, they'll eat their own eggs just because. Don't even need to be desperate. Chickens be brutal lol

Chickens will definitely pick and peck at each other until things get ugly, even with all possible room to roam. It isn't caused by poor conditions like too small cages and such, but factory level conditions definitely make the problem worse.

You can have an acre and a handful of hens, and they'll at least occasionally peck at each other. The problem really only starts when there's an injury, or conditions prevent a bird from moving away from more peck heavy birds. You don't want an injured chicken kept with the flock. It isn't even necessarily eating the injured bird out of some kind of prey drive. They just go at even minor wounds.

Now, with enough space and care being taken, that isn't likely to result in death. But it can, no matter how much room is involved if you don't isolate injured birds.

I'm not sure exactly how "wild" you're thinking, since you aren't going to run into truly wild chickens in most places. But feral ones that started as kept birds, those you'll find in plenty of places. Our neighborhood has two flocks that started from abandoned birds something like twenty years ago. And they'll definitely eat the hell out of one of their own if it gets sick or injured. And they'll absolutely eat one of their own that gets killed by a car or whatever.

We have a partly feral hen that decided she owns our yard. A while back, her comb got injured, and we had to keep our other hen inside long enough for the injury to heal, since we couldn't catch the volunteer hen. They see a little blood, and they're like "yum!", the same as they do when they see a worm or bug or even a piece of meat.

And chickens will eat any meat they can get to. Chicken is even considered a good food for chickens. Won't hurt them, plenty of protein, and they'll gladly pick the bones clean of scraps.

Dammit Harbor Freight! Always ruining a mid tier joke with affordable pricing on acceptable quality goods!

1337 comments?

You are truly uber

A button fly's what?

Shit, make sure you take good notes. Share that stuff with lemmy.

I'm too damn paranoid to join in a lemmy related game like that, but it does seem like it would be relatively easy to find a decent group here.

Hey, hey, now.

Nobody on roll 20 can afford a real machete

I mean, a pond filter and pump will do the job fine. Wouldn't even need chlorination tbh. If it stays running at a high enough volume, nothing harmful is going to set up shop before you'd need to replace the water to begin with. It isn't impossible for a nasty to build up, but the risk is really low once you're turning a small volume of water over fast.

There's online calculators for water turnover rates. Plug in the volume of your pool + a little extra for the system, shoot for a 4-6 x a day minimum, and afaik, you won't even have mosquito larvae.

But, being real, you're going to be losing a ton of water from splashing and evaporation anyway, so filtering is a lot of expense for something that's likely going to be used maybe a couple hours a day at most. You'll have to have that pump running 24/7. In a small system like that, you'll also be doubling the amount of work.

I'd just dump it into the barrel as is once it gets low and dirty, chlorinate that, then filter for particulates as you go, moving it back and forth to the pool however. It'll cost way less, and do the same job.

Did you comment in the wrong place?

Your comment is talking about resolution, and the post is about YouTube throttling speeds, not resolution of videos.

I suspect you were trying to respond to a comment instead of making your own top level comment, though I'm not certain.

In any case, if the comment is in the wrong place, now you know. If it isn't, well, it may help to know that it's out of place thematically.

Edit: I think this comment https://midwest.social/comment/18120563 is where you intended to respond