The landscape was different. Digg was in 2004. Reddit in 2005. They both came in a time where social media was at it's infancy and it was anyone's game to make it big. Whereas today, there are already established social media sites and the best any alternative social media outlet can do anymore, is absorb some numbers and try to prove to be the better alternative. It's a lot about thinking outside the box and figuring what a platform can do that the other can't.
Reddit has over 53 some odd million users. Million with an M. Lemmy has gained, at most, upwards of just thousands. To call it a 'mass exodus' is really overselling it.
It's going to take a fairly long time, for Lemmy to even scratch 100k even. I'm on both Reddit and Lemmy. Lemmy, for a more positive experience. Reddit, because the numbers are just there.
Released in the same year as Reloaded, which I don't think a movie series of that caliber has been done in a long time or since. But we got two Matrix sequels in one year. Reloaded has gotten a little more accepted as time went on but people are still divided on Revolutions. I quite frankly, thought the mainline series couldn't have ended on more of a note than it did. A lot of the content has gone over everyone's heads, even at the time, because it was all techy-techy stuff and had biblical themes in it as well. But if you look at the entire Matrix series as you would TRON, it makes a little more sense.
The way I see something as 'unpopular' is that you have to feel strongly about it. I've studied the way some people have posted over on Reddit, on all unpopularopinion based subreddits like 10thDentist, TrueUnpopularOpinion .etc
What I've noted people of doing there is that they're saying the opposite of what people prop as popular, for the sake of being the opposite. They don't feel that strongly about it and you can tell. They'll write a 2-liner post that is very dry, summarizing that they don't like something because everyone else did, just through their own words. It doesn't feel strong, doesn't feel relatable or resonates anything.
I love opinions where someone points at something and has a very vibrant feeling towards it. I'm tired of any of them, unpopular or popular, that are along the lines of "I don't know why I like it, I just do" and "It sucks because...it just sucks and I've got nothing to add to it".
I feel the concept of FB can still work. Just don't have someone like Mark running it.
Friendica is an option but I don't want to keep going to social media platforms where I have to constantly server hop. Lemmy is about as far as I'll go, but anything else, is a deal breaker.
Leaving Twitter for Hive Social was a no-brainer. Almost anything that isn't heralded by that sycophant Musk was a win.
I don't use TikTok, Instagram, WhatsApp .etc so that's easy to avoid.
Reddit is more or less a struggle, obviously I'm still there to a degree because their numbers outweigh Lemmy's and I do like the feeling of instant interactivity because of those numbers.
I fully expect them to nuke the filibuster to pack the court.
Correct me if I'm wrong, but nuking the filibuster would end up working both ways, wouldn't it? If there's no filibuster, then if Republicans are somehow in control, they'd get by just as much with no resistance in passing laws than if Democrats did because there'd be no opposition, right?
If true, I am almost under the impression that no filibuster is actually a bad idea.
I'm disappointed to see that there are posts on this community that are half-assed. I mean, come on, I see this kind of quality on another platform in another community of the same name.
Everyone's 'okay' with it until it's $5 more. Then another $5. Then another $5.
This is what's happening with all of these streaming services. They're all doing the gradual boiling water trick. They know if they turned the dial all the way to hot to make the water boiling, metaphorically speaking, that nobody in their right mind would want to jump in. But if they just turn the dial slowly, let the temperature build up by hiking these prices bit by bit, it wouldn't cause that much of a stir and people will be complacent with it.
I'm mostly asking out of curiosity, but also maybe for anyone here that'd like to know. But if you buy Ubisoft games from GOG, like Prince of Persia, they won't need the shitty Ubisoft launcher, right?
God, Retire already! You're not in the 80s anymore!
At least some bands from the 80s realized this, which is why they've spent some of their albums on experiencing new sound. Iron Maiden has done it, which is why they're still awesome, they aren't relying on their old reigns because they're a talented band that can evolve.
Motley Crue, can't do that. They're a one-era trick playing pony.
Places like Flickr can go fuck themselves because they want 12-character password limits. 12! Some people can barely even remember a 6 string password much less one that's 12.
Why 12? "SECURITY!" they'd spam. I've found it more secure to have a mix of special characters, lowercase/uppercase and numbers than the longer string of a password. Just means you're going to increase the volume of people having to reset their passwords now and then because you required them to make it 12 characters long.
I don't understand why people would like 12 characters...
Glorious.