Google alternative
sorrybookbroke @ sorrybookbroke @sh.itjust.works Posts 18Comments 401Joined 2 yr. ago
sorrybookbroke @ sorrybookbroke @sh.itjust.works
Posts
18
Comments
401
Joined
2 yr. ago
Previously a musk simp, until it started effecting him. he's a YouTube techfluencer who's always all in on tech. Full blown optimism even when it's obviously wrong with sudo-libertarian ideals without calling himself libertarian. Guy thinks the best of all tech companies while ignoring all faults until it's insanely in-your-face
Oh yeah bud, it's entirely real. Try it now, go to x.com. or twitter.com if you're scared that's porn (reasonably so)
I'm certain the military killing of a guy with a warning shot that was investigated by the military was as the military states actually a good thing, and a happy miracle.
Also, no, it wouldn't have. If they ignore the warning shot, the next shot isn't a warning. They don't let the guy get into the base, they don't let them approach the gate, they don't approach the truck until the operators are out, they aren't dumb. The military has procedures for this and when a warning shot is applicable, they have ample oportunity for a kill shot afterwards
The military is fairly well trained as a whole
Maybe it's lemm.ee? Not a furry but in all while sorting by new, I get a large quantity of furry porn, along with other porn. I'll admit I'm blocking every porn community until I can just block instances, so maybe that shows more, but it's been like this the entire time
Wishing death upon young forced recruits who know their family will suffer, be killed, or worse if they don't go along is disgusting.
Fuck Putin for putting innocent people into this position but that's what a large portion of the soldiers are. Innocent.
I celebrate when the enemy dies, and we are closer to the end, but I recognize it is not their fault. I don't celebrate their death I celebrate progress towards peace.
They did not start this war, they didn't choose to fight, and if they tried to rise up they and their family would be shot. When you see that happen continually through your life in order to protect the ones you love you'd likely do the same. It's easy to say this when you've never had to make that choice and if you did in the same circumstance, you wouldn't be here to make that comment
You stand on your high horse in comfort not knowing the horrors they face celebrating their death because they didn't topple a government.
Slava Ukrani. The sooner they win, the sooner both Ukrainian and russian people can be safe, and free
Oh shit man, you've deleted that knowlage accidentally. Looks like you need to run some recovery software on your brain.
What would your suggestion be then? I'm not opposed to more radical plans, even [likely bannable] actions, in many circumstances specifically climate I see it as a neccesity, but I don't see the case here. You may call it naive, but this has worked with other issues and will continue to work today.
As a socialist yes, I agree, the system needs radical change, but that cannot happen through violent action, look at all previous violent attempts. nor would I argue it to be needed here. Again, in Europe this is already happening within our flawed system.
And yes, under a system where peoples basic needs this wouldn't be as immoral, but it's still not art and is still theft.
To reiterate a person who prompts for the stle of ghibli does not need to know what that means. The absurd amount of effort that went into creating it, or the time it takes to hone that craft. In fact, if you were to describe these things, AI could not give you something coming close to the quality of "in the style of ghibli". This is a fundamental issue too, not something that will get better with time
Ha ha, yeah, but have you ever heard of the ball hammock by verse group? It's like a tropi-ball breeze
This doesn't make it moral, nor does this have to be the case. For an extreme example, slavery is always profitable. We see much less of it today through regulations than before. Thing is, we can. It's not hard to tell what's AI and what's not with the right tools, and unless they can prove they have the rights to their models training content this should be banned. Heavy fines just like when they trace art today, or steal it in other more old fashioned ways. That too is more profitable, but rare due to regulation
AI art is new and without regulations as it is we will see the worst possible outcomes. This can be hampered with regulations or broad lack of support by people like us. We can simply reject it. If there is no demand supply will be useless.
Will this slow down progression? Yes. So has banning forced labour in amarica. China and russia had an absurdly quick leap forward heavily utilizing it, does this mean we should re-instate it? If we focus solely on progress at the expense of people we have nothing to progress for.
When mechanization took field work away mechanics jobs, office jobs, and service jobs came up. This took a hard laborious job which damaged a person and allowed people to pursue better jobs. AI only takes, with no benefit to the common person.
This will be beneficial in the long run, cutting this out now. AI is a useful tool but it can't create new techniques or concepts. It needs input. If let to be how it's going it'll stagnate our culture. In capitalism stagnation is death.
We can't feed ai output to an AI either so with the mass proliferation we're getting close to the peak on development even using our current methods. Model collapse is much worse than we thought it would be and we have no solution. Newer models and models trained the same way today are markedly worse.
Opinions change on the scale of a person to another. The real way forward is through conversation and political engagement. People hate to hear it, but this does work. Look at the EU, with their recent acts to regulate AI. Things can be better.
We can track down the horse, we can build fences to stop it from getting too far next time, we can close the barn door to keep the other horses in, we can shoot it and use it for meat if it's too quick. There are ways forward, we don't have to just let this horse run wild.
Deleted
Permanently Deleted
Jump
Yup, the very one. Did you know it ends in the jfk assassination with judy being the president and the wolf dude being his wife?
The technique, brush strokes, composition, colouration, medium, etc at every step is decided by the artist when they draw it. Each part is crafted.
When you prompt, you simply get a new image and keep prompting until those aspects are what you want. Using others technique, brush strokes, composition, coloration, medium, etc. While only adding concept. It is equivalent to asking an artist to draw you something, revising, then pretending it was your own work, not paying the artist, and doing so without their knowlage
If you have permission to use these things, there is no moral issue, but as it is these models are trained on all public data. From any artist, mostly smaller completely unpaid artists
The diffrence is with photoshop you make each decision. Any you don't through filters or separate tools come with the permission and knowlage of their creator. They did create the art, with permission to use what they used, with full control over what makes the art art. It's technique, brush strokes, composition, colouration, medium, etc. This past just describing it, it took skill.
I am a developer, I understand how these AI's work, and have made tooling for them myself. No, prompting is not equivalent to the skill of drawing art. When you prompt (in the style of davinci:1.3) this in no way means that you understand what davinci's style was, and even if you did describing that instead would be detrimental to your output. The AI was not trained on an accurate description of the concepts involved. Just "a painting of a woman sitting facing the viewer with a slight smile in the style of davinci". Any more description would degrade the result.
Thank you for the reasonable responce though
You mean asked to log in right? Sorry for the downvotes lol, but what you've written is kinda incomprehensible. You shouldn't be though. If you are, I'd try another trusted mirror
Not their work though, it was a collection of random artists work conglomerated by an ai which they then prompted until they got these.
Would you congratulate someone who commissioned art from an artist for their work while arguing it to be theirs? No, it might be theirs since they paid for it, but it's not their work, even if they described and revised it. Here, no payment or agreement was made. This is just theft.
No clue if your comment was before the edit, but after finding out they were mostly if not all AI I edited to reascend my vote and say fuck AI art.
None should have been an option
I masturbate furiously with bad dragon(tm) dildos and I think n#2 would mostly work, save for the shafts start, but if you say the fifth would work n#2 will be fine
Huh, they deleted my comment and downvoted you. Great stuff mod team
What have you done to that poor, poor, linux install
You've just made me a more effective bug murderer, you fool
Same with dolphin for those kde people out there
DDG is a good bing proxy, but I do prefer Google's results so I use startpage which is to Google what duckduckgo is to bing. Neither have their own web crawler they both are simple proxies to another engine