Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)SN
sooper_dooper_roofer [none/use name] @ sooper_dooper_roofer @hexbear.net
Posts
0
Comments
205
Joined
4 yr. ago

  • Apparently NOT a Boeing. Woweee!

    "ATR72 looks like, and what do you mean another boeing? only 1 crash this month has been a boeing and thats the South Korea one."

    "No. This looks like a Embraer and the crash in South Korea is not Boeing’s fault. It looks like the likely cause was hydraulic failure and impact in air causing midair failure, potentially maintenance issues, but Boeing has not touched the aircraft for at least five years," said another user.

  • obviously they'd bring their kids along they'll figure something out, or their kids will kill each other down the line and make a new line of humans

    I see your argument a lot from liberals, no offense--the insanely rich are the best equipped to survive cataclysm, and will definitely have advance knowledge of it before it happens (at least past a certain threshold of importance)

    Like if you just gave me a goat and a few potatoes I'd survive an apocalypse provided the temps and rainfall weren't too fucked, and also provided there was noone else around me. That's why they're buying up New Zealand, or all this rural land in the middle of nowhere. They will survive.

  • These scenarios are identical in my opinion. They'll likely dwindle and die in a short time anyway. The wealthy are not particularly well suited to rebuilding society

    No they won't lol

    As for "rebuilding society", they'd eventually get there after some generations. Nothing humans built or invented was particularly difficult to do, it was inequality/lack of resources/lack of necessity holding people back at every step