BarqsHasBite @ someguy3 @lemmy.ca

Posts

135

Comments

2,258

Joined

2 yr. ago

Gamers and sailors: strong feelings about pirating.

Gamers and wine connoisseurs: lack of fine motor control being bad for business.

Sailors and wine connoisseurs: drunks.

For houses? Essentially no one, houses should not be for rent. Apartments in my mind are fine to rent because you can build a fuckton of apartments on a small amount of land. But there can still be a problem if there aren't enough apartments available to buy.

Yes. You shouldn't be allowed to have a second house to rent out. The problem is limited supply in a given area, and if everyone buys a second, third, fourth house (or townhouse) then there is no supply left for people that want to actually buy to live in that house. Frankly I think it's unethical. There are plenty of other ways to invest your money.

I also don't think this position is limited to leftists, although yes the leftists here have a very dramatic take. I think anyone that thinks about this should see the problem.

That is the answer, sorry to say you just don't want to accept it.

Perhaps an example but this time with media. The right wing media is happy and gleeful to twist, misportay, and even straight out lie. The left wing media can't do the same thing because they are beholden to the truth. It's the same thing. That's my last reply.

You got your answer, and your response is "but but but have they considered burning it all down?"

One side is happy and gleeful to burn it all down. And the other side is beholden to not burning it all down.

Musical number on it https://youtu.be/o7jlFZhprU4

Putin's ability to directly impact American lives is limited. And what he does do (inflation on food, gas) is too far removed for most to understand.

This helps explain the low pay high workload mantra.

Yeah don't go to mini Russia.

Then you make a rule "no low effort political questions".

Seriously? Political questions, political related questions, and international political related questions.

The one you listed is for essentially for posting articles.

Seriously? You're this pedantic on the word discussion? Ok I will amend my first comment to:

We just had probably the most consequential election of our life and you want to ban discussionquestions and the resulting discussion in the comments?

Jeez all over again.

It's not a small topic, it's a small community to set up all these tiny communities.

Community is what we called subs on the other site.

What's wrong is fracturing. Lemmy is not so massive that it can sustain niche communities for every little topic.

... And now you can't ask anything about politics. There's was doubtless going to be political questions to ask, and politic adjacent (where do I move) that will all be removed.

And you can't even ask about effects on the world either! Gaza, Ukraine, NATO, trade, tariffs, etc. Are those going to be removed? All valid questions, but sounds political to me.

Like way to shut down shit tons of conversation.

We just had probably the most consequential election of our life and you want to ban discussion? Jeezus.

No kidding.

Tyl.

They're probably just happy they're not being bombed. (Anything fall on them?)