BarqsHasBite @ someguy3 @lemmy.ca

Posts

135

Comments

2,258

Joined

2 yr. ago

New to Lemmy? There are hordes of users (no exaggeration) that say they won't vote because the Dems aren't left enough and bothsidessame.

We have some serious income problems but yeah a lot of people waste a lot of money. Big ass trucks and SUVs, eating out, shopping sprees, all the newest bells and whistles, gotta keep up with the Jones.

Well it will give immunity, to the ones that survive.

Oh the pwesident doesn’t have any juwustiction owver the states… nothing he could do!

Lol you turn to mocking the president about ??? the things he can and can't do??? Yeah that about sums it up, you showed who you are. You have no idea how things work so sorry to say you're acting like a child (with those spellings). Why am I even bothering, ciao.

but that should pave the way for a candidate on the left that people actually want

Candidates don't emerge for voters that don't vote. Because in the analysis they don't even exist, because they don't vote. It's a null data set. No politician is going to gamble on it possibly maybe existing but don't vote. No donors are going to donate to causes which the voters maybe possibly exist but don't vote. It simply doesn't happen.

Well don't I feel silly. Thanks!

NIMRH Not in my rental house.

*NIMROD Not in my rented out domicile.

So you didn't read anything huh? Or did you get too embarrassed at your own mistakes and how they bordered on lies? Why am I bothering with someone that denies reality. Ciao. (But if I find more rail wins from Biden I'll let you know.)

Yeah it's not many people because most convictions are from the states, which he does not have jurisdiction over. Ok? Got it? The president can not do anything about state convictions or sentences. So he did what he could with federal charges, because federal charges is what he has jurisdiction over.

Part of an attractive deal is pleading down more serious stuff down to simple possession.

Red herring:

Something that draws attention away from the matter being discussed or dealt with.

It's not a red herring. What you are trying to do is closer (still not quite) to a red herring because you are trying to draw attention away from what he could do and trying to minimize it with the repeated "not many". The number doesn't matter, he did what he had jurisdiction over, You are the one much closer to a red herring. Ciao.

And you're still crying that it's not fast enough. Someone said it has to be reclassified first before either decriminalization or legalization (no idea if accurate). But you just want to cry that the boulder isn't being pushed up the hill fast enough. And crying over what he could and did do. Not to mention that he can't do it - Congress passes legislation, not the President. He did what he could which is tell DEA to look at it.

Still crying over not doing Herculean overhaul in TWO years. Because you need Congress. Congress is the one that could do massive reform, not the president. You don't even know how your own government works and yet you want to cry. This is some serious "I'm 14 and don't know how things work, but I'm going to cry about Biden bad" from you. That's twice that you don't even know how your government works.

Dude you can negotiate without a strike. This is more "14 and don't know how things work". Here I looked it up for you https://youtu.be/EM6jMtG_MB8 Also pay attention to how a rail strike would have ground the US economy to a halt. But don't get the wrong idea, it was about Biden's success pushing on the negotiations. You should watch him regularly. I'm very certain there's another one with even more rail union wins but he often has shitty titles so I can't find it. Don't forget to cry though.

And more crying about green power generation. You want to set up a domestic industry, green power is not one and done. You can do way more when your country's money feeds back into itself. For both generation and EVs. This is more 14 and have no idea how industry or long term industry works. But you just want to cry about not fast enough.

You dropped the chips stuff too.

I thought this before, but your reply here showed it full tilt. You have some serious "I'm 14 and don't know how anything works" vibes. You are the epitome of what was said at the start:

Good news! Apparently a lot of excitingly new young progressives are mad we haven’t rolled it back up high enough and are refusing to help!

Wait. Okay, not good news. Sorry.

And

Because they’re not rolling it up fast enough! Can’t you see? They just have to roll it faster and preferably all the way and then I’ll get excited and help. Yup. Until then I’ll be adding ankle weights to you too. And don’t forget it’s all your fault too.

I notice you didn't respond about voting either.

No matter what I say you'll cry about something when you don't even know how things work, so Ciao.

That's not what a red herring is.

And yes federal because that's what he has jurisdiction over. And yes violent offences are a big and completely different step up. It was intended to be possession and that what it was, not other things. You're doing a weird deflection on what was a good call. And plenty of advisors probably pointed out that many times some decently bad incidents get argued down to possession for plea deal.

If it's good enough for Star Trek it's good enough for me.

All of them, that's why I can't do horror.

Bravo.

Well damage resistant to normal operations and prevent cascade failures. But the damage resistant part doesn't extend to bombs.

Any decent bomb or missile is going to do a lot more than break a valve.

I think they all tried to become semi-fancy to compete with restaurants, instead of focusing on being cheap, cheap, cheap.

Easily repairable? Lol.

Allies? Lol.

Yes, that was the DEA being told by Biden to look at it. And you're forgetting that he forgave federal possessions.

You're back to crying about "only" forgiving some debt. And you're back to crying about not doing a Herculean task of completely overhauling post secondary in 2 years. Who's selling it as reform? Nobody. You're making shit up just to cry about now.

The rail union got to negotiate. Whatever they got, they negotiate for themselves. You're crying again that Biden didn't do _______. It's not even his place to negotiate or dictate what happens, but you're crying about it.

Green energy generation still needed (needs?) a boot in the ass, which is exactly what IRA did. But you can't cry about this one, so no credit to Biden! Oh wait there's the crying about IRA. Seriously?

All you're doing is crying about things not happening at warp speed. And then ignoring the things that do happen. You are exactly what the top comment are about.

What this comes down to: If you don't vote, then you can't complain or cry. Do you vote? Good. But I'll say that your crying is largely inaccurate. Do you not vote? Then it's bizarre and pathetic that you are crying while you are the one that is actively kneecapping progress.

Be water my friend.