snooggums @ snooggums @midwest.social

Posts

2

Comments

2,573

Joined

1 yr. ago

It would cost more in time and effort to do it right.

After, just like all the first world nations who had universal healthcare followed by famine.

Can't avoid it.

It made it about 250 years before imploding, so it wasn't a terrible design.

Your mom is a pizza.

I don’t understand what you’ve said here

Yeah, that is clear.

Just like the food that was thrown out due to not being served.

Pizza crust is the cheapest waste. Like a few pennies per slice at most. Calling it wasteful is the most ridiculous stance to take.

I was giving you the benefit of the doubt, but you squandered it.

A ton of kids in poverty were not born into poverty, but their parents lost jobs or had health emergencies or parents who died. A lot of parents didn't choose to become pregnant, because birth control isn't perfect. Some kids are in extreme poverty because the parent without the job leaft due to domestic violence.

And sometimes kids end up in poverty because a natural disaster made the family homeless and they lost their job becsuse the business was also halted due to the disaster.

Blaming the parents casts a huge net and carches a lot of people who had shit come up in the 18 years between birth and adulthood.

I'm in Topeka and have said it multiple times this summer!

For sure. Even when it isn't a law the same outcome happens when corporations get the police to enforce their policies.

It's hot in Topeka.

Extreme poverty is caused by a lack of income, not by the cost of living.

Making things cheaper doesn't help people in extreme poverty who have no money.

Giving them money does!

They will speak against him, but odds are the number of votes for him will be comparable to his last two outings.

Quit yer cryin'!

I can confirm this sign is accurate.

I've never been to heaven.

Why not both?

Society benefits from children not growing up in extreme poverty.

Improving the lives of the people around me is an improvement to my life.

I wish more people understood this.

SCOTUS approves this comment

Unless there is an option to cut a slice into a smaller slice, eating less than one serving size by discarding a portion of the food is still portion control.

Which is absolutely ridiculous since you are paying for the water that you are sharing.