snooggums @ snooggums @kbin.social

Posts

0

Comments

2,105

Joined

2 yr. ago

I don't need a backseat in this vehicle.

I know there isn't in the US because I recently tried to find one to purchase, and I am complaining about that lack of availability.

Why would anyone shit on the idea of a car that is the same size, gets the same mileage, and is otherwise the same as a hatchback but with an open bed instead of a closed hatch? What kind of nut job would suggest a van and a second vehicle that would get the same fuel consumption as a solution? Think about it hard for a second.

Those are called hatchbacks and are pretty awesome! Unfortunately the Civic hatchback I had for 15 years would have been better for the last 5 years I owned it if the hatch area was just a bed becauseI no longer needed a back seat but would have been 10x more convenient with an open bed in the fact same space instead of being enclosed.

Whoopsie!

Why are you lying to defend IDF terrorists?

It is the only way to avoid being called an antisemite on the internet anymore.

Thank you for finally admitting that you are a troll!

Imagine being such a worthless piece of shit that you argue with someone who wants a truck version of a car by constantly saying they want something other than they are literally saying. It probably helps if you are jobless and unable to make romantic connections with people because of your inability to maintain proper hygiene. That must really help with the personal need to rile up others so you can feel better about yourself while you cry yourself to sleep on the bare mattress you sleep on.

The only rage here is you against literally anything that has an open bed, even if it is the same size and gets the same mileage as a compact car.

It is easy as shit to do that!

Step 1: Be born into wealth.

I don't know the other steps because I missed step one, but everyone I know that succeeded at step 1 is set for life.

I want a truck the size of a Subaru Brat, which had a shorter total length than a Honda Fit.

Is that unreasonable?

How is an extra piece of equipment that is less convenient and takes up more space a better solution? Where the fuck am I going to keep that when I could just have that same space in the back of a vehicle instead of an enclosed trunk?

Either truck means something different in your language where you cannot conceive of one being small, or you are somehow opposed to a vehicle with an open bed existing at all.

Please keep offering less convenient solutions than having an open bed in the back of a car sized vehicle though, it is entertaining how fucking ridiculous the suggestions are instead of just agreeing that a smaller trucks would be a nice alternative.

I don't want two vehicles that don't do what I want. I want one vehicle, that is the same size and gets the same gas mileage as a car that does what I want by having an open bed in the back instead of an enclosed hatchback.

Its like you can't read.

Note: The Subaru Brat, which is one of the example I said that I wished they sold trucks in today, was smaller than a Honda Fit. Do you think a Honda Fit is big?

Congratulations on having a different experience! A van is too big for my tastes, you know they are basically enclosed trucks right?

I clearly said I didn't want a tank, and have no idea why you automatically equate an exposed bed with a tank. Do you know how small a Brat was?

Hatchbacks and vans are enclosed and not fun to haul stinky stuff and aren't conducive to hosing out after.

The main problem in the US is companies not making Coupe utility sized vehicles like the Subaru Brat or the El Camino. Small and light vehicles with beds. I would love a small AWD electric or hybrid truck that size that has good mileage for commuting and just enough convenience for moving cumbersome and stinky things around. The Ford Maverick is a move in the right direction, but is almost a midsized truck instead of going full on compact.

One is a browser following web standards and the other is a shitty company adding non-standards based development features intended to lock users into there browsers.

It was shitty when Microsoft did the non-standard features to lock in with Internet Exporer and it is shitty that Chrome does it now.

That sounds more like an issue with them using some proprietary browser bullshit than a problem with Firefox.

I just gave you an example of menus not expanding.

I haven't come across a menu that didn't expand in Firefox. Which website(s) have this issue in Firefox?

Firefox + uBlock Origin and I have no issues with any websites.

Which ones are you having issues with and what is happening?

Is there a benefit you see for having open tabs instead of bookmarks ready to open when needed?

The Batgirl technique!