Skip Navigation

User banner
Posts
1
Comments
67
Joined
2 yr. ago

  • Arguably one of the least disliked of Republicans, John McCain not withstanding, for me personally.

    At least tried to maintain some sort of civility. Too bad that doesn't mean much when he goes along with the rest of colleagues and their craziness.

    Not sad he's gone, but not particularly happy either. Might open up Utah for the Dems in the future.

  • I already lost Roe v Wade cause "progressives" cutting off their nose in spite.

    Even if Hilary lost, that was no excuse to let Republicans take over the senate or elsewhere. Which they did.

    Even back in my more "libertarian" days I still voted for Hilary cause what I knew could happen. And it did happen.

    Edit: Turns out Bernie/Progressive voters really did come out a lot for Hilary, which lead to the popular vote wins. I was wrong. Sorry.

  • Twitter, as far as I have recalled, has almost always been a cesspool for hot takes and hate. Just with Elon in charge the flood gates have really opened and has acquired a particular flavor mimicking his own tastes.

    The real question now is if this will ultimately lead to the ban or slow death of Twitter. People really can only put up with so much vitriol.

    Many countries are lining up with laws and bill coming after social media, usually under the goal or "goal" of protecting kids, so we will see how things turn out. Might even be a quicker death/change then.

  • It is an error on you.

    "I predict there'll be some convictions," speculated the lawyer. "I think the strategy is to get bad convictions, but to get them fast," he continued, saying that Trump would then be able to appeal the decisions, after the election. Dershowitz argued that this is the reason prosecutors are "rushing" to get their cases against Trump to trial.

    He didn't just say Trump would win on appeal or "He believes there will be convictions but overturned in appeals." He predicting the approach of the prosecutors and said more than this.

    You are being dishonest.

  • And why does that? His reasoning he states in the articles?

  • He believes there will be convictions but overturned in appeals.

    This what you said, correct?

  • "They're going to get on the bandwagon," Dershowitz said of prosecutors. The "approach is to get him before the election, convict him before the election, and he wins on appeal."

    This is what he said correct?

  • Again. He didn't say that. You are incorrect.

    I didn't say anything otherwise.

  • I just showed you what he said in the articles you provided.

  • No he didn't.

    "They're going to get on the bandwagon," Dershowitz said of prosecutors. The "approach is to get him before the election, convict him before the election, and he wins on appeal."

    "They're all going to raise it," said Eric Segall, a law professor at Georgia State University. "Trump is going to argue that he and all his merry people were simply ensuring the integrity and fairness of federal elections, something they had an obligation to do, and therefore he has immunity."

    Segall said the laws protecting federal officials from state prosecution serve an important purpose. Consider, for instance, federal officials working to desegregate the South during the civil rights era being thrown in jail by state officials opposed to those efforts. But Segall stressed that he doesn’t believe the facts of Trump's intervention will warrant immunity.

    He saying that's their approach. Ultimately might come down to the Supreme Court which hasn't favored Trump and similar cases so far.

  • I definitely think some sort of residuals or compensation for reusing their voice AI should happen if they are profiting off of it.

    That being said, I see a world in the very near future where voice actors don't even act out their lines and just say a number of things for recording to train an AI voiced version of themselves. Then directors/creators and just manipulate and use it as they please to create their product.

    Some mods in games are getting this already, voiced Morrowind and the like, and I definitely seeing it as a boon. Voice acting has always been a weak point when it came to stuff like that as you can write/script/design the best you can but can lack decent/any voice acting.

    Interested to see how things play out.

  • https://www.washingtonpost.com/election-results/2023/ohio-issue-1/

    Votes received and percentages of total vote
    Response Votes Pct.
    Yes 111,710 28.4 %
    No 281,694 71.6 %
    An estimated 12.6 percent of votes have been counted.

    As of 7:50 PM right now.

    Edit 1: 7:53 PM
    Yes 138,143 29.4 %
    No 331,325 70.6 %

    Edit 2: 7:55 PM
    Yes 158,861 29.1 %
    No 387,174 70.9 %

    17.5% counted.

    Edit 3: 8:04 PM
    Yes 193,220 29.7 %
    No 457,553 70.3 %

    20.8% counted.

    Edit 4: 8:19 PM

    Yes 232,355 30.9 %
    No 519,368 69.1 %

    24.1% counted. Yeah I don't see it passing.

    Edit 5: 8:25 PM

    Wasserman and Decision Desk already called it for No. Will see how big of a margin now, but it is clear the proposition failed.

    Edit 6: 8:48 PM

    Yes 376,012 37.1 %
    No 638,696 62.9 %

    32.5% counted.

    Edit 7: 8:56 PM

    Washington Post projects No winning.

    Yes 429,617 38.1 %
    No 697,980 61.9 %

    36.9% counted.

    Edit 8: 9:15 PM

    Yes 603,050 40.7 %
    No 878,360 59.3 %

    47.4% counted. Keep in mind a lot of the urban/city areas haven't even counted most of their votes yet where the more rural areas have.

    Edit 9: 9:22 PM

    Yes 744,053 42.5 %
    No 1,006,127 57.5 %

    56% counted.

    Edit 10: 9:30 PM

    Yes 809,110 42.8 %
    No 1,082,764 57.2 %

    60.5 % counted. Urban areas still undercounted.

    Edit 11: 10:06 PM

    Yes 1,100,677 43.2 %
    No 1,448,086 56.8 %

    81.5% counted.

    Edit 12: 10:36 PM

    Yes 1,217,867 43.4 %
    No 1,585,920 56.6 %

    89.7% counted. Cuyahoga and Lucas counties seem to be the ones having a decent chunk to count still. Both heavily leaning No.

    Edit 14: 8:33 AM

    Yes 1,315,346 43.0 %
    No 1,744,094 57.0 %

    97.9% counted. Looking like a slam dunk and massive support for No. Winner winner chicken dinner.

  • What? I thought we were having a conversation.

    Oh well. Vaccinate your kids boys and girls. Chau

  • No, and I explained why.

  • Not forced. Require for public schools and such.

  • I didn't say there was negligible difference or was talking about big pharma.