I recently met someone and minutes later they slapped my thigh and rubbed it, only to reveal a dead mosquito they slapped and rubbed to make sure it was dead. I immediately understood what happened, but, when she realized that her mosquito-killing habit ended up slapping a stranger's thigh and rubbing, she apologized profusely.
It's really, really unfortunate that the girl wasn't able to see the context of your actions. There's this saying that you hurt where you care. It seems like you're aware of how you feel and your values are clear. I hope you can find ways of bringing those values into your life. You can't go back, but you've got now.
I agree that mental rules add complexity, mental rules such as "If I run, I'll be seen as weird".
I also agree that the change to running not a reflex in the sense of "This pan is hot! I'll instantly move my arm!"
Without looking at the data, I'd assume the switch-to-running point is arrived at statistically. Most people have a point —or a range or a distribution of points— at which they start running. It could be that this switch-to-running point is similar to breathing: most people go from inhalation to exhalation (a point we could call switch-to-exhalation or, if reversed, switch-to-inhalation) without thinking about it, but they can also consciously control it.
The contradiction you mentioned disappears if you don't consider the switch-to-running point a reflex, and instead consider it like breathing. You can consciously hold your breath and therefore change the switch-to-exhalation point. You can also consciously walk faster and therefore change the switch-to-running point.
I agree that the exhaustion is different: different muscles are being used and they're being used differently. Maybe saying that was factually wrong. My bad. I was trying to get across the point that energy expenditure past the switch-to-running point is higher if you choose to keep walking than if you run. But the fact that there's more energy expenditure doesn't necessarily mean that you'll be more exhausted; it could be that when you run, even though you can save energy, it actually uses muscles that are not properly trained and therefore get fatigued faster than the muscles you'd use if you walked.
Interesting. The conflicting studies could be unified by a theory presented in this article https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S096663622100120X The article explicitly addresses the "trigger theory" (the fatigue and discomfort in the tibialis anterior and other muscles triggers running), but I don't know how they integrate those findings into the unified theory because I haven't read the article yet 😅
There’s a Know How or How To (I don’t remember the name of the YouTube channel; EDIT: @executivechimp@discuss.tchncs.de found it. The video is linked in their comment) that explains why we used to believe moderate alcohol consumption is healthy.
Turns out, those surveys only ask “How many drinks do you have a week?” Notice they tacitly ask about the present, how many drinks now and not in the past. If you were a very heavy drinker in the past and got sick from it, you likely stopped drinking altogether.
Not only that, but people with chronic illness many times choose to not drink at all.
These two populations (sick ex-drinkers and chronically sick non-drinkers) make it seem as if not drinking is not that healthy. But remove those groups from the data analysis or control for past alcohol usage and pre-existing conditions and you end up with a clear pattern: drinking alcohol in any quantity is unhealthy. The more, the worse.
Sorry for the lack of sources; I’m on mobile. I think there’s a WHO report titled “There’s no safe amount of alcohol” or something like that.
Yes, I agree that it's a hodgepodge of linked concepts. Sorry! Here's my attempt at explaining:
When you eat food, it's like your battery gets filled. If, after eating a good meal you were to stand up and just stand there idly, your battery would slowly drain. Eventually, over the course of hours, you'd get hungry and need more of the food; you'd need to recharge your battery. Now, if your battery is full and you start walking, the battery will drain a little bit faster. You know this from taking walks, going on hikes, or commuting; they can make you hungrier! Now walk a little faster and the battery will drain even a little bit faster. If you take your sweet time on a walk, you will not nearly get as hungry compared to walking as quickly as you can.
Another useful image is holding a cup full of water and tilting it more and more, spilling the water; the more you tilt it, the faster the water gets drained from the cup.
Now, think about when you walk. When you walk faster and faster and faster, there is a point in which you automatically start running. Turns out, this point in which you go from walking to running is special because it leads to energy savings.
Weird, isn't it? Here's a way to look at it: if you try to walk a long distance at a very high speed, you'll get exhausted, but if you run the same distance at that same speed, you'll be less tired.
This is similar to some cars and bikes. If you've driven a gear-shift car or a bicycle with gears, you'll understand that, past a certain speed, it's much more efficient to switch gears. If you don't switch gears, your motor will get exhausted or your legs will get exhausted. If you do, your car's battery or your legs' batteries will be able to push forward for longer.
I love this. It aligns with the previous literature we had on teams. If a team needs heroes to solve problems, it may well be that their management (or whoever) is placing too many absurd expectations on the team. The other side of this coin is that, if a team is not an attractive place for 'great individuals', it may well be that there are improvements that the team needs to do, especially in relation to the team's autonomy, mastery, and purpose.
It sounds like the fact that people understand recipes or simple instruction lists means that they could transfer those same skills into programming. Would you consider cooking pancakes as abstract as writing a macro?
I'm so sorry. You'll think I'm annoying and stupid, but would it be absurd to ask for clarification regarding what you mean? I couldn't really understand your point and it sounds like you have a passion for this topic and a clear point of view.
That's one take: that Andrew Yang is a Trump supporter. However, another take is that he made a massive mistake by making it seem as if he supported Trump, even though he was talking about something specific and narrow.
I understand the fear of the bridge being burned down. I also see how that would make Proton like WhatsApp, which has its own protocol and locks its users in. Would it be inaccurate to say that your fear is that Proton pulls an "Embrace, Extend, Extinguish" move?
In any case, it's worthwhile looking at your claims. You mention that Proton is "actively trying to turn open protocols into more closed stuff".
Why can I use PGP as the encryption protocol in Proton Mail? Is that a closed protocol?
Why could I download an archive of all of my emails last December both through IMAP and through MBOX? Are those two "closed stuff"? In fact, I could've downloaded my archive as EML; is that a closed protocol?
Why could I download a copy of my contacts as VCF? Is that a closed protocol?
Why can I export my Proton Pass passwords as JSON or CSV? Are those closed protocols?
Is it really tenable to argue that Proton is pulling an "Embrace, Extend, Extinguish" move when they support PGP, IMAP, SMTP, MBOX, EML, VCF, JSON, and CSV?
You could argue that it's simply a matter of time until they pull the rug and close their protocols. Let's elide the whole discussion regarding the probability of the rug pull happening and instead focus on the present reality: as of December 2024, I could download an archive of everything I have on Proton without a hitch. They do not have the whole Meta thing of "Please give us four working days for us to create an archive of your data". At least that wasn't my experience. I could download an archive quickly.
If users have the capability of downloading open protocol archives of everything they have on Proton, are they really stopping them from going elsewhere?
This is a great point! Humans can put names on things that aren't there, such as holes!
This 'naming of hole-like concepts' may sound trivial, but there have been entire cultures that didn't have 'hole-like' concepts and this stunted their ability to make certain discoveries. For example, the ancient Greeks could not have developed calculus; they did not have a concept of zero that they could use for mathematical manipulation. This shows an unfortunate reality: you can't mentally manipulate ideas that you don't have.
However, once you do have those ideas, they may seem obvious. This is a well documented human bias: the curse of knowledge. Once you understand something, it is very difficult to imagine not knowing that. For us, knowers of pupils, holes, zeros, and chasms, it may seem absurd to not have names for pupils, holes, zeros, and chasms. We take them for granted, when in reality it was not an easy road to arrive at them.
I understand your concerns of vendor lock-in. The fear is that it could avoid people leaving the service in the future. However, do you know that I use a generic email client that, through IMAP, contains a Proton account?
Your comment sent me on a quick exploration. I was not sure how strong the connection between depression and poverty was.
Here's what I thought before checking the evidence: on the one hand, poverty is associated with constant stress of all kinds, from material considerations to social stigma. On the other hand, wealthier people and societies lose their vertical social capital, which on its own could lead to loneliness. Additionally, wealthier people and societies can undergo radical changes of any kind (changes that are arguably more drastic than changes that poor people and societies undergo, simply because of the expansion of capabilities associated with wealth), and that could lead to the anomie that Émile Durkheim described in the 19th century.
I recently met someone and minutes later they slapped my thigh and rubbed it, only to reveal a dead mosquito they slapped and rubbed to make sure it was dead. I immediately understood what happened, but, when she realized that her mosquito-killing habit ended up slapping a stranger's thigh and rubbing, she apologized profusely.
It's really, really unfortunate that the girl wasn't able to see the context of your actions. There's this saying that you hurt where you care. It seems like you're aware of how you feel and your values are clear. I hope you can find ways of bringing those values into your life. You can't go back, but you've got now.