smooth_tea @ smooth_tea @lemmy.world

Posts

1

Comments

123

Joined

2 yr. ago

I think the point is to look past the idea of having to work just for the sake of an income.

I really find this a bit alarmist and exaggerated. Consider the motive and the alternative. You really think companies like that have any other options than to deal with those things?

As I've said before, if Hamas did not exist Israel would invent it just so they'd have an excuse to continue what they are doing.

Hamas could stop hiding in civilian populations.

Is there anything you fools don't gobble up and repeat like a mantra? Do you question anything you hear at all?

How dumb do you need to be to think that this is about Hamas? Tell me, how long did you fall for the weapons of mass destruction excuse in Iraq?

What's silly is that you lot consistently see the situation on its head. Either you don't get what is going on, or you don't want to tell the truth.

Hamas is what happens when you do to people what Israel does. It's that simple. You cannot deprive an entire people of their dignity and commit atrocities for half a century and then complain when a section of them turns to violence. Anyone who suggests that is an idiot.

You sound so utterly clueless about the whole thing. And stupid to boot.

I suggest you go back to the beginning of the discussion to see what it was about, because I feel like I'm going to be repeating myself.

Of course it's better because the risk of consequences is quite small compared to when you're breaking the law in your own country.

What is silly is the idea that that is in any way relevant to what we were discussing here. And I use the word discussing lightly. There's a big difference between the insinuation that a foreigner is at risk for tunneling into the Russia and the Russian government eavesdropping on its population.

The only reason Israel is able to imprison an entire people is because of the US greenlighting it, and here you are insinuating that we should turn to them to figure out what's going on.

Fool.

Nothing is going to happen when your traffic moves through Russia. In fact, you have more chance that something will happen to you if you don't.

Please do tell what could go wrong. Is the internet sheriff going to turn up?

Israel and the Occupied Territories: Shielded from scrutiny: IDF violations ... https://www.amnesty.org/en/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/mde151432002en.pdf

Palestinian children tortured, used as shields by Israel: U.N. | Reuters https://www.reuters.com/article/us-palestinian-israel-children-idUSBRE95J0FR20130620

I just thought I'd add this to counter the usual one sided view on the matter.

Anyhow I can assure you that taking edibles daily is certainly worse than have a beer a week.

This is a crucial point, how can you? Overlooking the major discrepancy in frequency of use.

The active ingredient in edibles is an analogue to something endogenous to the human body, alcohol is just a toxic substance.

How is any of that based on something besides your personal preference? What does quite bad mean? And what is "close to alcohol?" How much alcohol? How high?

I've also never met a person that drinks A beer. I've met lots that drink beers and call it a beer to minimize their habits though.

No offense but your opinion sounds like an anti drug ad from the 90's made by someone who's yet to admit their drug of choice is even a drug.

I suggest you ask a woman who has been raped whether she agrees that it should be compared to a cow's artificial insemination.

Everyone is so keen on resorting to the worst possible choice of words, with the end result being that they lose all meaning and its use shits on those who've actually gone true it. Perhaps you should think about that before you next try to signal your virtues.

"Feast on the eventual child!"

I eat meat, but I try to lower my intake and make the right choices as to it's origins, as I detest the horrible practices that happen. But man, these over the top descriptions just to create an emotional reaction are so ridiculous. They're no different from the anti abortion crowd yelling baby murder. If you have to resort to these sorts of arguments, you're really doing yourself and what you stand for a disservice.

Lastly, to answer your question, it's the same reason there's a difference between murder and involuntary manslaughter. Intent is a very important factor when we judge someone's actions.

You say that, but in her defense she was a prostitute.

You can bitch about it all you want but the reality is that it actually works for a select group, the Amazons, Binances, etc. And that was always how it was going to be. The failures you point to are not a sign that these things don't work, they were always going to be there, they are like the people during the gold rush who found diddly squat, that doesn't mean there wasn't any gold.

Anyone who suggests that AI "will return to nothing" is a fool, and I don't think you really believe it either.